(Soulier & Scott, 2010) The main difference between juvenile courts and adult courts was that juvenile courts were civil and adult courts were criminal. And until 1967, youth did not have any constitutional legal rights. The U.S. Supreme Court decision in In re Gault changed that. The Supreme Court decided that even though they were civil cases, juveniles still could potentially have a loss of liberty. The child’s liberty is precious, and they should have a lawyer to help them protect that liberty. (Stansby, 1967; Mlyniec, 2010) So because of that, all juvenile court cases where the offender could be imprisoned have the following rights; The right to have an appellate court review the lower court's decision, The right to confrontation and cross-examination, The privilege against self-incrimination, The right to receive notice of charges, The right to receive a transcript of the proceedings, and The right to obtain legal …show more content…
There are two other types: status offenses and dependency cases. There is usually a different process to all three types. Delinquency cases involve youth who have committed crimes. Which means that if an adult had committed the crime the case would be tried in normal criminal court. But the process is significantly different between the two court systems. Status offenses are violation that only applies to youth. Such as running away, truancy, underage drinking and curfew violation. The final type is dependency cases, these cases are when youth are being neglected or abused by their parents or guardians. These cases the judge will determine whether or not the home is safe for the child or if they should be removed from the unsafe