Justify Death Penalty

Improved Essays
THE DEATH PENALTY 3
The Death Penalty and Its Justification under the Constitution One of the biggest topics up for political discussion today is the death penalty. For years people have tried to argue whether or not the death penalty is actually justified under the United States Constitution. One side argues that it clearly does go against the Constitution on the basis of the Eight Amendment, while the other side argues on behalf of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Although the death penalty was once the major way of dealing with people who had committed crimes, most countries in the world today have gotten rid of the death penalty
…show more content…
From large crimes such as murder to small petty crimes like stealing a loaf of bread. However as we started progressing towards the modern era, the death penalty was only used for certain occasions when it came to committing crimes, specifically murder ("Origins Of Capital Punishment," n.d.). From the beginning of time to the middle ages, the methods to which the death penalty was carried out were incredibly violent. One of the earliest forms of executions was stoning, which entailed throwing massive boulders at a criminal …show more content…
Gregg tried appealing his case to the Georgia Supreme Court but they upheld the jury’s original decision. Finally Gregg appealed to the United States Supreme Court led by chief justice Burger ("GREGG v. GEORGIA," n.d.). Gregg argued that his death sentence went against the Eighth Amendment right to avoid punishment that is cruel and unusual. The Burger court decided that the death penalty didn’t go against cruel and unusual punishment in a seven to two decision ("GREGG v. GEORGIA," n.d.). The court ruled that if the defendant is being convicted of a crime such as the murder of another person, then the death penalty is clear and fair punishment for the defendant ("GREGG v. GEORGIA," n.d.). This case was one of the last times that the United States death penalty was really challenged. Although some states have chosen to abolish it within their state, on a national level it has yet to be seriously challenged since Gregg v. Patrick case in 1976 ("Death Penalty," n.d.). The court’s decision set a precedent for capital punishment in the United States showing that it will never be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The research below is the discussion between two cases that involve the death penalty and the effects that the cases had toward the prison system. One case explains how the discussion of an armed robbery was taken to the supreme court and details information on how it is unconstitutional and violates our 8th and 14th amendment Gregg wanted to fight over how the death penalty was a cruel and unusual punishment to those who were sentenced to death. He managed to win the case which led to a hold on the death penalty. The second case explains how the death penalty is fair and constitutional towards those who have committed a crime involving murder. Furman also fought for this case explaining how those who have killed are basically acceptable to…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Teresa Lewis Case

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Gregg v. Georgia court case is essential to the controversy surrounding capital punishment because it acknowledges the other side of the debate and completely conflicts its preceding case, Furman v. Georgia. Both cases provide the notion that the constitutionality behind capital punishment is still a subject that is up for…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Gregg v. Georgia starts with a man named Troy Gregg. Troy was imprisoned by the state of Georgia after he was found guilty of armed robbery and murdering two people in 1973. Following Gregg’s trial, the jury found Tory Gregg guilty and sentenced him to death. Troy challenged his remaining death sentence for murder, asked for an appeal, and claimed that his capital sentence was cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the 8th amendment. The Georgia state court ruled that the death penalty was for murder.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gregg v. Georgia 428 US 153 (1976) History: The case of Gregg v. Georgia originated in the state of Georgia. The case originally took place in the Georgia Supreme court where the petitioner originally pleaded guilty to the charges brought against them. From there the petitioner challenged the decision and said the death penalty was cruel and unusual punishment under the eighth and fourteenth amendments.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Furman V. Georgia

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Furman v. Georgia Supreme Court case is a fine example of the flaws within our justice system that must be fixed and even more of a reason to abolish the death penalty in every state in the United States. Capital punishment cases are very common…

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As well as what all of them did to deserve the death penalty, it shows that the death penalty should be punishment in criminal cases. Gregg v. Georgia is one of five trials that took place after the Furman v. Georgia trial that reinstated the use of the death penalty. Gregg was charged with robbery and murder on March 31, 1976. After the original ruling Gregg demanded an appeal, and it was taken to the Georgia supreme court. In both cases it was decided that the death penalty should be used, even after the four years of no death penalty because of Furman v. Georgia.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One concerning fomented subjects between America today is the death penalty. While the disagreement can remain reduced under disputes over ethics, a more prominent pragmatical strategy recommends defendable factors that are confirmed and supported by the crimes being committed that warrants the death penalty. Supporters with respect to the death penalty feels that it deters crime, gives closure, or is a just punishment for those who choose to take away a human life. Those that are against the death penalty argue that execution of a human is a disloyalty of fundamental human rights, thus the eighth Amendment which expresses that a punishment cannot be cruel and unusual and is an ineffective crime deterrent. Some also believe that it is an outdated…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America is in the midst of a massive debate in regards to the constitutionality of the application of the death penalty, and while the importance of the Constitution cannot be understated in regards to this discussion, other factors, such as social science evidence and the many different ways in which the Constitution can be interpreted, are equally important. One of the principal arguments in favor of the use of the death penalty is that it acts as a powerful deterrent against capital crimes such as murder. However, empirically speaking, any causal relationship is highly dubious at best. The consensus in the social science community seems to be that there are far to many confounding variables to make any sort of meaningful determination in regards to the efficacy of the death penalty as a deterrent.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty: Cruel and Unusual Punishment The death penalty is a cruel process of a bygone era and has no place in modern day civilized society. The death penalty has evolved from a punishment for crimes such as petty theft and adultery to the absolute punishment for crimes such as the rape of a child, kidnapping, treason, and murder, to name a few however the death penalty is fraught with errors.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has been around as far back as the eighteenth century B.C. During colonial days, the death penalty was there in order to keep the religious command. There were a number of offenses a person could commit and receive the death penalty: Murder, Man stealing, bestiality, poisoning, witchcraft, etc. Each crime took its roots in religious sermons and biblical laws. Race played a large part of a sentencing for capital punishment before, during and after the Civil war.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taking the life of another has been considered a heinous crime that is worthy of capital punishment; but should taking the life of a person who has taken the life of another be justified? Is the murderer’s life less important than that of the person whose life he took? The death penalty has been the highest form of punishment around the United States, execution of innocent men, its negative influence on our society and the offence it has against human rights are all concerns that make the capital punishment wrong. The first established death penalty laws date as far back ats the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the Death Penalty a Justified Punishment? Since 1976 only 1,392 people have been executed after being sentenced to the death penalty (Statistic Brain). Many of the people convicted and executed were serial killers and people who had committed treason. The death penalty is a justified punishment for sane people who deliberately kill and execute people in cold blood.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    From Hammurabi’s Code to current death row inmates, capital punishment has been utilized by many governments as a tool for the justice system. The death penalty in the United States can be traced all the way to early American history when it was under colonial rule of Britain. Though in early history the death penalty was used for even menial crimes such as burglary, capital punishment in the United States is currently used for the most heinous crimes, such as first degree murder, rape, treason, or espionage. Early on, this form of punishment was not considered to be as controversial as now. Because the nation was unified under similar Christian beliefs, there was no question in how death could be the worst punishment for the worst crimes.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through his study, Sellin found doubts in the deterrence affect that the death penalty supposedly created (Donohue & Wolfers, 2006). Then, in the landmark Furman case in 1972, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty was unconstitutional on both the federal and state level (Donohue & Wolfers, 2006). Up until 1975, there was a widespread moratorium on the death penalty. Justin Wolfers, in an analysis on the historical death penalty debate, cites that Isacc Ehrlich’s findings of “each execution sav[ing] eight lives,” caused Solicitor General Robert Bork to sway the Supreme Court’s reversal of the 1972 ruling (Donohue & Wolfers, 2006). When looking back through the death penalty’s history, a lot of flip-flopping has occurred at both the state and federal level.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty has always been a very controversial and hotly debated topic. Killing someone is a very heinous act that cannot be tolerated, especially when premeditated and committed in the first degree. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but it is conspicuous that capital punishment is the only way to cope with these terrible acts. Capital punishment is additionally a way to reduce the amount of murders committed in the first degree. Premeditated murder cases are also very infrequent.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays