Justification Of Knowledge

Improved Essays
Previously, the common belief relating to knowledge was that it is a defined justified true belief. However in the era of exponential discoveries, knowledge is perceived as something that can be reviewed and revisioned over time. The vast discoveries of our yesterdays, todays, and tomorrows have led humanity to define knowledge,and all we gain from it, as an objective fact, that can be supported or denied by progression. This progression may be, but not limited to: evidence, discoveries, technology, or social trends. Therefor we can ponder upon the knowledge issue, in regard to two areas of knowledge: “How do we know that the natural sciences and mathematics will be justifiable in the future?” The foundations for these areas of knowledge, regarded …show more content…
Calculus, the study of change, is arguably the most recognizable and the most difficult of all the maths. Personally, I love math and when giving to the opportunity to take AP Calculus, along with IB Math Methods, it was an offer I could not refuse. However, prior to taking the class I knew nothing about what Calculus actually was. Delving in the study of Calculus, I discovered that it dates back all the way to the Egyptian Moscow papyrus (1820 B.C) with calculations of volume and area, a key concept of Calculus, inscribed within the tablet. There exists a plethora more of other early traces of Calculus, such as Exodus’ concepts of limits (408 B.C.) and Archimedes 's integral calculus (287 B.C.). The reasoning behind the math of these mathematicians is something could not be argued upon at the time, thus their concepts of math came to be known as justifiable truths. It has been centuries since the idea of limits was discovered but it is something that, to this day, is still taught and explored within modern day …show more content…
Referring back to my special situation of taking AP Calculus and IB Math Methods, these two maths are considered to be at two different extremes, however at times they intertwine with one another. Such a thing comes in handy especially on test, when I am able to solve an AP Calculus problem using mathematical methodology and concepts learned from IB Math. A great example being using Sandwich Theory for solving for the limit of complex differentiables. So, from my personal experience, I can agree with the idea that mathematics shall always be reliable when proven definitely true. Accepted knowledge involving mathematics because it is logical and supported by testing, is reliable in all instances that various concepts apply

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Justifying belief and what is knowledge’s nature and scope is well defined by the philosophical stance of “naturalized epistemology” in that knowledge comes from the empirical sciences though it’s application of theory, methods and results. Knowledge comes from proving things. This is different from the classical foundationalism which asserts the need to basic belief from which other beliefs can be built on. This essay will discuss the distinctiveness of naturalized epistemology, then how it differs from classical foundationalism and conclude with why it is referable. It should be noted that both systems of knowledge have many variations and so this short essay is more a general discussion.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, along with my peers, enrolled in Calculus I, differentiation, that spring. I saw some of my classmates struggle on the tests and quizzes, and I wondered why them and not me. I realized that differentiation required a lot of algebra, and I had mastered algebra from my college algebra course. However, my classmates who struggled…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern world, knowledge is power and everyone seeks power. Many people spend their entire lives trying to gain knowledge as they believe it to be the most important quality that is obtainable. Absolute knowledge is naturally sought after by every person on the planet, because we, as humans, are curious by nature. However, it is dangerous to search for absolute knowledge, because one might discover things that they do not want to, one might become obsessed with the neverending chase for absolute knowledge, and one might lose themselves in the process of attempting to gain absolute knowledge.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Is there anything science should not try to explain? Science is knowledge and knowledge is power; power to do good or evil. Sometimes ignorance is bliss” (Davies). These words shared by theoretical physicist Paul Davies ring solid throughout the haunting story of “Frankenstein,” by Mary Shelly. Seen by many as the “Modern Prometheus,” this story details the exploits of the fictional scientist Victor Frankenstein, with his humble beginnings as a curious learner, his obsessive thirst for the unattainable, and the unspeakable creation that ultimately lead to his downfall.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlotte Kang PHIL 110 Paper 1 Option 2: Foundationalist response to infinite regress argument for scepticism Sceptical arguments are designed to show that we lack any knowledge whatsoever. Such arguments have informed views about what knowledge is and whether we have any in the first place, by establishing the conditions that any acceptable knowledge claim must meet. This essay addresses the idea of radical, or global scepticism: that every statement is doubtful, and that information and theories are never certain or justified. Thus, claims for truth and knowledge about the real world depends on the defeat of scepticism. This essay discusses a particular argument for global scepticism – the infinite regress argument.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, two versions of the knowledge argument will be described in order to reveal the best reason for thinking that it’s true and the best reasons for thinking that it’s false.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are 3 different types of knowledge: acquaintance knowledge (I know Auckland well), skillful knowledge (I know how to ride a bike), and propositional knowledge (I know that snakes are reptiles). The first two forms of knowledge are interesting, but we are only concerned with the third, what it is to know some proposition, ‘p’. We automatically note a difference between belief and knowledge. Individuals can believe propositions that are not true; but if you know that ‘p’, then ‘p’ must be true. You cannot know something incorrect; if it is incorrect, then you do not know it.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Calculus In High School

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Calculus is an AP course or Advance Placement course in which the students can take the AP test to receive college credit, and the class should be treated with the respect and rigor of a college course. This book was written by experienced AP teachers, and more suited towards AB Calculus over BC. This is undeniably advanced, a college course in high school; this class should be taken senior year, but can be taken in junior year depending on the advancement of the prior…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Knowledge takes the form of a combination of stories and facts.” How accurate is this claim in two areas of knowledge? Prescribed Title #2 Amy Wu…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Correspondence Theory Over the last century, the world has become a place of everlasting technological advancement. The yearn for knowledge and advancements in academics has brought about an magnificent change in the world. Societies across the globe are rapidly changing and evolving due to new discoveries in the fields of knowledge, but many may ask the question: How can this knowledge be trusted? How is knowledge justified?…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two of the most intriguing schools of philosophy are the two which deal specifically with epistemology, or, what is better known as the origin of knowledge. Although they are not completely opposite of one another, they are argued in depth by two of the most famous philosophers in history. The origins of study in rationalism and empiricism can be found in the 17th century, during a time when various significant developments were made in the fields of astronomy and mechanics. These advancements undoubtedly led to the questions that probed the sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? Many people throughout history began to question whether science was really providing them with the true knowledge of reality.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans contain a deep yearning for knowledge. Given that the previous sentence is merely an assertion with no justification, there is no need for one to believe me – it may be true, but until that is justified and found to be true, it is nothing beyond a belief. Prior to a proposition’s justification, one should not be infer that it is knowledge. Justification for objective knowledge can be divided into two categories: a posteriori arguments and a priori arguments. These categories take many names; a posteriori is similar to empirical arguments, which are defined as observational proof.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    True Belief Theory

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Determining what the true definition of knowledge is has been a topic of debate among philosophers for centuries. Establishing the difference between knowledge and opinion is no easy task, and many theories dealing with this issue have arose over the years. Today, the most widely recognized theory for quantifying knowledge is the justified true belief theory, based on three conditions that each need to be satisfied for one to be considered to have knowledge. While this theory holds true in a great deal of cases, there are counter examples in Gettier cases that show the justified true belief theory to not always hold strong.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abstract: Mathematics is a subject that has developed differently throughout various societies through time. Papyri left behind by the Egyptians and clay tablets from the Babylonians allow us to understand how these civilizations developed their ideas of mathematics and how they used mathematical concepts in their culture. Studying the evidence left behind by these people allow us to understand their number systems and their understanding and use of simple arithmetic concepts. Introduction Egyptians and Babylonians are groups of people who both developed mathematical concepts on their own societies. We can learn much from their ways of thinking by the evidence that was left from them.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Dawkins Analysis

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “.. and it is likely our descendants will know about more things that, for now, we do not” (Dawkins, 211 p.3 par.1).With time and knowledge we are able to develop new technology and explain the unknown and prove it’s real and not just…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays