Utilitarianism Death Penalty

Improved Essays
All lives matter. It is not up to us to make decision whether one’s life has to live or die, but I believe that justice should be served and if a person murders an innocent person, he/she should pay the price at the cost of his/her own life. According to Utilitarianism, most people would agree because it would only promote overall goodness. It would lessen the violence and the killings of innocent people if the criminal is put down instead of just being locked in a jail cell. According to Utilitarianism, whichever provides the overall goodness and the right thing to all or almost all of the people is the right thing to do whether it is for our own good or for the good of others. Most people would agree that every person deserves a specific punishment for every crime a person is guilty of doing. If justice was real, a person has to pay the price of what he/she owes and the punishment should equally weigh to that person’s crime. Therefore, if …show more content…
Some murderers get away with their crimes because prosecutors give them light charges. It is unjust because it isn’t fair that they take an innocent life and they get away with it. Some of those murderers will kill again because putting them in prison for a very long time doesn’t really change the fact that they’re still murderers. Some murderers kill people because it gives them pleasure and they will keep doing it and nothing will stop them until we try to. I believe that the only solution to that problem is capital punishment because that is the only way they can repay what they have done and it is the only way the justice can be served. Most people would agree about my opinion because it matters most to all of us is our safety and freedom. Nobody would want to suffer great pain from a loss. The less criminal we have to deal with, the less we have to worry about and the happier we will ever

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    A child’s right to die. To some that seems quite morbid and unethical, but to others it is an ethical thing to do. This process of euthanasia involves giving a child a chance to end their life. To qualify for this opportunity a child must be terminally ill, experiencing pain, close to death, understands the consequences of this decision, and must have parents’ and medical staff consent. With all these steps followed, some individuals are still opposed to this idea because of it being immoral.…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral on Capital Punishment Working at a prison is a dangerous job; you are surrounded by evil minded crooks and murderers every day. Even though security is said to be on top and the rules are set, these people, these immoral souls have no limits and a rule or a law for them is seen as a challenge to break. Donna Payant, a 31-year-old correction officer had to learn this the hard way. The year was 1981 and she had just arrived for what was supposed to be a regular day at work, however, it turned out to be her last. Donna Payant, the mother of three children and with a loving husband, was murdered at work by inmate Lemuel Smith, a rapist and two-time convicted murderer.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is speculated that these historic events were influenced by utilitarianism: the abolition of slavery, women’s suffrage, abolition of child labor. Other things have also been influenced by the philosophy for example prison reform with the practice of deterrence and rehabilitation, rather than vengeance. Mercy-killing are sometimes characterized as permissible under the philosophy. To justify this, Euthanasia (providing a dying person with a quicker death, at his/her own request), at times will prevent considerable suffering, without causing anyone else to suffer this is when utilitarianism would say that it is morally right to help the person die. But in other cases this can have the opposite effect, so utilitarianism would state that just…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, the criminal justice should treat everyone equal despite their morality beliefs. Even though the crimes may look like they were committed for the greater good, it doesn 't stop from being a crime. Taking an innocent life will never be good. A good act should be helping people, not killing them. Killing people should never be counted as a “compassion” act, it should never have a lenient law.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism simply states that society should find what creates the most utility and apply that action. Philosophy is not performed in a vacuum and every crime has different circumstances that can lead to a different punishment which creates the most utility. Every consequence must be weighed if a certain punishment is applied and every case is unique. A utilitarian decision can be based upon past precedents and experiences, as done in the United States legal system. For example, society would not benefit from the execution of a mentally impaired man that was the cause for another’s…

    • 2649 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Paper It is a reflex of our conscious to conclude that the killing of innocent people is morally wrong. However, there are certain circumstances that can easily persuade our bleeding hearts to sympathize with those who have committed murderous actions we would have previously deemed unforgivable. Survival is one of the most basic instincts of all living creatures. Nevertheless, there are times when dying seems like the only solution to the suffering a human being may endure. As a society we have already given moral lenience to killing in war, self-defense, and the use of capital punishment, yet when it comes to the death of virtuous individuals by the hands of someone else, even if that someone is a medical professional, people hesitate.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The moral justification for legal punishment finds itself in philosophy through two theories that contrast each other in their complex and thought-provoking ideas: the retributivist theory of punishment (RTP) and the utilitarian theory of punishment (UTP). The RTP focuses on the individual and the crime to justify its proportional punishment. On the other hand, the UTP suggests that maximizing happiness in society is the main goal. The importance of defining legal punishment from just punishment cannot be understated. Legal and non-legal penalties, albeit penalties, do not share the same magnitude as legal punishment.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Punishment involves the infliction of pain on a supposed offender or genuinely guilty party for an offense, for example, a legitimate transgression. Since discipline includes delivering agony or hardship like what the culprit of a wrongdoing perpetrates on his victim, it has for the most part been concurred that discipline requires moral and in addition legitimate and political justification. While philosophers all concur that punishment is at any rate now and again reasonable, they offer different records of how it is to be defended as well as what the infliction of punishment is intended to ensure – rights, individual self-governance and private property, a political constitution, or the law based process, for example. Utilitarians endeavor…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The value of a human life is a somewhat subjective idea. There are people who value it more or less. The creature in Frankenstein seems to blame itself for the death of Victor and therefore feels that its moral obligation is to kill itself. When someone commits a crime do they deserve to be punished for their crime? Is giving some the death penalty moral?…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay I will discuss two approaches to punishment which are retributivism, also known as non-consequentialism, and utilitarianism, also known as consequentialism. I will then analyse three justifications of punishment within the utilitarian approach which are reform and rehabilitation, individual and general deterrence and incapacitation. Retributivism is a sociological perspective of crime which looks at the different forms and changes in punishment. It is a backward thinking approach as it does not look at future consequences of punishment and is mostly concerned with offences already committed and getting ‘justice’. This approach is considered similar to ‘an eye for an eye’ as it is based on the idea that if we inflict harm on another…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, involves a person in extreme suffering, and wishing to deliberately end their life with the help of another person. Euthanasia is illegal in a majority of countries. These countries feel that it should never be ok for someone to help another person kill themselves regardless of the circumstances and even class it as manslaughter or murder (Choices, 2015). A utilitarian has many views on the subject and why it is acceptable and why it is not. Throughout this assignment, I will go into further detail of a utilitarian’s view on euthanasia and whether or not they think it is acceptable.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In our current case, a young black man was accused of a crime spree involving 22 cases of armed aggravated robbery and 1 case of murder. He admitted to 10 cases of aggravated robbery, but denied the murder allegation. There was only 1 witness that placed him at the scene of the murder. As there were circumstances that would 've prevented this one witness from clearly identifying our defendant, it could be a case of mistaken identity. Because all of his other crimes were robberies carried out with a 22 caliber handgun, the fact that our murder was initially a robbery that ended in murder with a .22 caliber handgun led police to charge him with capital murder.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay Against Capital Punishment Google defines Capital Punishment as “the legal authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime.” It is argued that the death penalty is justice for those who commit crimes deserving of such extreme punishment. It is argued that the death penalty is a punishment set up so that the grieving families of the victims will feel a sense of accomplished justice. According to the Death penalty information center since 1976 there has been 1,438 executions. The death penalty should be abolished because it is a barbaric, immoral, and small-minded.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All of these subjects and opinions are very contradicting in themselves. When I think of an absolute side, the other side seems to have logic to it as well. There are many different things that could change my opinion on this subject. I think that people who commit murder should have to suffer in prison for an extended period of time. They should not have the freedoms that other people have.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment should be abolished because it is too expensive to retain, it is revenge not justice, and it 's possible for innocent people to be executed. The execution of human life should not be something we advocate here in the United States, it’s sad that as a nation we preach peace while still executing our citizens. The millions of dollars being wasted on executions could be spent improving our criminal justice system, and in doing so, improve our country. Not only is the death penalty a waste of our hard earned tax dollars, but it also puts innocent lives at risk. Mistreated or mishandled evidence can easily put an innocent life on death row.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics