Original Meaning And Structural Analysis Of Chief Justice Marshall

Improved Essays
Chief Justice Marshall used both Original Meaning, Original Intent, and Structural Analysis in the interpretation of the Constitution as it applied to Marbury v. Madison. Marbury raised concerns in his case against Madison in which Chief Justice Marshall decided: 1st The right to the commission of Justice 2nd If he had the right was the right violated and do the laws give him a form of redress 3rd If he has a form of redress, it a mandamus issued by the Supreme Court
In addressing the Marbury’s 1st point Justice Marshall refers to Article 2 Section 2 of the Constitution and interprets the passage through Original Meaning as he states “It is... decidedly the opinion of the court, that when a commission has been signed by the President,
…show more content…
In addressing Marbury’s third point Justice Marshall uses both Original Meaning and Intent interpretation of the Constitution as he references Article 3 which provides the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Marbury brought his case to the Supreme Courts under Article 2 Section 2 seeking a writ of mandamus making his case originating in the Supreme Court and not an appellate review. Marshall uses Original Intent, Original Meaning, and Stare Decisis as he uses the literal meaning of Article 3 Section

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gibbons Vs Ogden Essay

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1803 William Marbury sued John Madison for being denied the role of Justice of Peace and claimed that the executive branch was forcing actions on the other branches. Before Thomas Jefferson was elected into his role of Presidency, William Marbury had been appointed to be a Justice of Peace by John Adams, but the appointment process had not fully been completed. By that time Jefferson had been in his role of Presidency and Adam's role was terminated. Thomas Jefferson had then denied Marbury access to his role appointed by the previous President, even though William had been expecting a role. William Marbury brought the case to the Supreme Court, stating that not one branch of the government was allowed to force an action upon another branch.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Senator Hill Case Summary

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The act removing the Court’s jurisdiction is therefore unconstitutional because it allows Congress to go unchecked in violating the Qualifications Clause of the Constitution. In Ex Parte McCardle, the removal of the Court’s jurisdiction was not for the purpose of allowing Congress to get away with an unconstitutional act. The Court therefore has jurisdiction to hear this case because that act of removal is null and void and according to Powell, Congress must seat Senator…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first question was answered when Marshall claimed that Marbury had a right for the writ of mandamus because he was appointed and followed procedures. The second answer was that the Supreme Court should provide a solution to Marbury’s inconveniences. Marshall also believed that the United States’ courts were at liberty to protect their citizens, no matter the situation. The third answer addressed judicial review because the “Court could not grant the writ because Section 13 of the Judicial Act of 1789… was unconstitutional insofar as it extended cases of original jurisdiction” (McBride). Marbury had rejected this act which inclined the Supreme Court to deny his position.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When ruling on the case, John Marshall had three issues and questions…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    John Marshall Dbq

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages

    When John Adams appointed Federalists to various judicial positions before his term ended, James Madison discarded 17 commissions for justice of the peace, rather than delivering them to the men appointed. Though many of the men did not care about this position, Marbury filed a suit in the Supreme Court, demanding the order of the commission. John Marshall ruled that Marbury had a right to the commission. However, during this ruling, John Marshall declared an act of Congress to be unconstitutional. Marshall said that this law, the Judiciary Act of 1789, could not be used because it authorized an action which the constitution did not allow.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court had the right to review acts of Congress and the actions of the President. If a law was found unconstitutional, the court could overrule it. Marshall wrote, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” He argued the constitution is the Supreme law of the land and it has the final say over the meaning of the…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Madison, the Marshall Court settled that the idea judicial review is the only the judicial branch that can review whether laws and actions were approved. The Marshall Court declared the power of the Supreme Court that has the capacity to understand the Constitution and could use it to determine the legality of the other two branches actions. The Marshall Court modified how the Supreme Court was seen. In doing so the Marshall Court had an intense result on the American government.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Creating the powers of the Supreme Court of the United States having the final word. Marshall argued that the Constitution is the “supreme law of the land” and that the Supreme Court has the final say over the meaning of the Constitution. He wrote, “lt is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” (infoplease) A few lasting impacts of this case would include how it established the Supreme Court of the United States power and legitimacy as a branch of government.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Litwack Vs Michener

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    James Michener said, “Their decision to divide the power of the government into three parts - Legislative, Executive, Judicial - was a masterstroke.” He thinks that our government and constitution are equally powerful and effective. Thurgood Marshall, Supreme Court Justice, had a different view on the constitution. He recognizes…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power in the Court John Marshall was one of the most prominent members of the U.S. Supreme Court. Marshall is known for producing one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history after his ruling in the well-known case of Marbury v. Madison. During the time he served as Chief Justice, Marshall managed to bring more power to the judicial branch. He did so by working his way up to the highest position in the court, strengthening the unity of the justices, and establishing judicial review.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If he had such a right, and the right was violated, did the law provide a remedy? And if the law provided a remedy, was the proper remedy a direct order from the Supreme Court? Writing for the Court, Marshall answered the first two questions resoundingly in the affirmative. Marbury’s commission had been signed by the President and sealed by the Secretary of State, he noted, establishing an appointment that could not be revoked by a new executive. Failure to deliver the commission thus violated Marbury’s legal right to the office.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A hot debate relevant for today is the question of how the constitution is to be interpreted. When writing the constitution, the founding fathers were clearly living in an ern which entailed concerns that are different from concerns today. During the constitutional convention, men discussed debated until they agree on what should become the framework for our great nation. Because of this the constitution appears to be ambiguous on many particular issues which we face today. Are we then to address those issues in light of the context in which the constitution was written, or are we to view it as a living document that’s meaning changes with time?…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marbury Vs Madison Essay

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jefferson also learned that not all of the commissions for the judges had been delivered. After hearing this information, the new president ordered his Secretary of State, James Madison to deny the delivery of the commissions. Realizing that he would not be receiving his position as justice of the peace, William Marbury went to the Supreme Court and tried to obtain his commission. He told the Court to order Madison to give him his job. The Supreme Court had the power to issue such an order because of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which created the judicial branch of the federal government.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brandon Henderson Professor Dr. Edoh Agbehonou Pols 1101 17 April 2015 The decision between Marbury v. Madison was made under judicial review and is considerably the most important decision in the history of the United States, judicial review is when the doctrine of legislative and executive actions are under review. This case gave the supreme says “The government of the united states is of the latter description. The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the constitution is written” (5 U.S 137). Court the power to limit congressional power.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thurgood Marshall

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thurgood Marshall grew up a minority, but valiantly gained a voice as he fought for the rights of not only himself, but other minorities as well who lacked a proper voice and equal rights enjoyed by white citizens of the United States. He was born into a century that would be monumental for African Americans and minorities alike. Although the century began with heavy segregation, discrimination, and violence against the African American community, its conclusion would produce an active voice for individuals of that community as well as other minorities. Marshall, much like his African American counterparts, dealt with the same threats posed against others (Ball 18). He faced racism and discrimination, and threats of violence, but bravely…

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays