Thrasymachus And Socrates Character Analysis

In the beginning of the first book of The Republic, Socrates is returning home with his friend, Glaucon, and one of Plato’s brother from a religious festival. On their way out, Polemarchus sends Adeimantus, another brother of Plato, to stop the three of them and invite them over to the house of Cephalus. Cephalus, is characterized as a rich, well-respected elder of the city. There, Cephalus expressed his feelings about Socrates not visiting him as often as he should, since they are almost like family. A little into their conversation they start to talk about being just and unjust. Many different characters are discussing their own definition of what justice is. Every character that tries to make a statement regarding justice assumes that they have an accurate definition of what justice means. Cephalus, begins with what he thinks is the correct definition of justice: living up to your legal obligations and being honest. Socrates seems to disagree …show more content…
A simply man would attempt to emulate what Socrates alluded to as the Forms, keeping in mind the end goal to make his own spirit methodical and adjusted as the structures themselves. Maybe it can be contended that Thrasymachus and Socrates perspectives of equity are direct inverse from each other because of their encounters in life. He was kind of an instructor that was enlisted to educate well off children of affluent men in the Athenian culture. As a pedant he didn't trust in the goal truth, or good target truth. He didn't consider things "right" or "off-base". Or maybe he unmistakably saw all activities as preference or impediment. He asserts that the possibility of equity was advanced by the more grounded with the end goal of assisting their own particular advantages. Socrates then again demands that equity is something great, and