Justice In Plato's Republic

Improved Essays
In this essay, I will argue that Plato's definition of justice in the individual is inadequate since a just individual cannot act unjustly. I will start by defining justice in the individual. Next, I will list few examples of act Socrates considers to be unjust. Then, I will show how just individuals (i.e., the philosopher-rulers) in the republic act unjustly through the example of their treatment of people with disability, therefore, Socrates's definition is contradictory. Lastly, I will propose two remedies to solve this contradiction.
Socrates claims that an individual is just when each of the three parts of the soul does its duty, and all three parts are in harmony (Bloom, 441e). More specifically, the calculating part should rule the soul,
…show more content…
For example, in Book V, Socrates suggests individuals who are "born deformed, they will hide away in an unspeakable and unseen place, as is seemly" (460c). I am unclear what exactly the unspeakable and unseen place is, but I can infer that this place has to be outside the republic. By allowing "deformed" individuals to live in the republic, the city-soul analogy will no longer work. Socrates will need a new class of citizen to include people with a severe disability, making the city quadripartite while the soul tripartite. To sustain his city-soul analogy, Socrates has to either kill people born with a severe disability or send them elsewhere outside the city. Both choices involve harm, therefor, both choices are …show more content…
Socrates claims that this can be achieved through studying multiple subjects that involve mathematics and dialectics (522c); mathematics is the bridge that connects that connects sensible objects with forms. As a consequence of their education, the philosophical rulers will become rational agents and conduct a cost-benefit analysis to determine the fate of people with disability. Since people with physical disability will have a hard time producing and specializing in craft, the rulers will conclude that the cost of keeping them in the republic exceeds the benefit, and people with physical disability will be sent to the unseen place. This is contradicting Socrates’s definition of justice in the individual because a just individual, after performing a rational calculation, cannot cause harm to

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The final reason Socrates presents against Crito’s offer of help is the Agreement Argument. The Agreement Argument follows that by participating in Athenian society, the citizens of Athens have implicitly agreed to obey the Laws. Socrates made an agreement to the State to follow the Laws, and it is just to keep to one's agreements, and so to escape would be to break an agreement and so Socrates ought not to escape with Crito (Plato, 1997b, §51c-52d). This agreement refers to is a form of political obligation which relies on the idea of tacit consent, which is formed solely by living as a citizen of Athens. Tacit consent is the idea that by living in Athens, the citizens have agreed to follow the Laws of Athens implicitly by benefiting from the organization, protection, and education of the State.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By this, Plato meant that reason did not overcome spirit, spirit did not over come appetite and so on. The soul was essentially balanced. Plato believed that a soul that is in disorder is miserable and that person will never achieve happiness. He compared the soul to that of a city. An ideal city is that where all parts of the city are working together.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates is an avid supporter of self-knowledge, of better understanding yourself and your nature. From this better understanding of self comes an increased knowledge of right and wrong. Socrates’ main concern is acting justly and ethically. Knowledge of what is just and ethical comes from constantly…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic, Plato introduces many of his viewpoints and ideals through arguments. Some examples of what he introduces are what defines a city, principles of specialization, the tripartite soul and the sun, the line and the cave. In this paper, we are going to focus on the tripartite soul argument and the nature of justice. The tripartite soul argument states that a human soul is divided into three distinct parts that all want to achieve different goals. The soul, according to Plato, is composed of a rational, a spirited, and an appetitive factor.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon is unsatisfied with the argument between Thrasymachus and Socrates regarding Justice. Thrasymachus believes Justice is for the common good, it is not for the good for an individual, that any compromise is involved. Glaucon renews Thrasymachus’ argument, he divides the good into three classes: things good in themselves, things good both in themselves and for their consequences, and things good only for their consequences. Socrates places justice in the class of things good in themselves and for their consequences without any hesitation. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove by exploring that Justice is best, not a compromise.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In life we sometimes question who really has the authority to judge the rights from the wrongdoing? In the end of Crito, Socrates, a well- known philosopher was trial for corrupting the youth and sentenced to death by the people of Athens. Although he was sentenced to death unjustly, Socrates still choses to stand with the Laws of Athens that persuaded him to stay in prison. The voice of The Laws that Socrates abide by convey three reasons that swayed his belief to stay; the parental reasons, the agreement reasons, and the benefactor reasons.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato was an early Greek philosopher who instituted the Academy and is most well-known for his writings of unparalleled influence. Throughout his life, Plato had written many dialogues over numerous subjects, some being justice, epistemology, political philosophy, and even theology. One of Plato’s most successful and widely read dialogues was the Republic. Before the Republic, many of Plato’s dialogues consisted of a speaker, Socrates, refuting the positions of his interlocutors, and many of the dialogues do not end with an adequate answer. However, the Republic delivers a position in which Socrates takes on justice and its relation to happiness.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Book I of Plato’s Republic, Socrates and Polemarchus debate the assertion “it is just to give to each what is owed to him,” that Simonides originally theorized. The postulation develops from Cephalus’ prior claim that a just man is one who “speaks the truth and repays his debts” (331d). Socrates undermines Cephalus’ definition of justice by proposing a scenario wherein a madman lends a sword to a friend, and the friend may either return the weapon or keep it from the obviously dangerous individual. Socrates concludes that returning the weapon, which would be the “just” action according to Cephalus because it constitutes honest repayment, is unjust. In his debate with Polemarchus, Socrates once again critiques the proposed relationship between…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Soul Analysis

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This section of “Plato’s Republic” demonstrates key ideas of the soul from Socrates view point. From the start of this section Socrates introduces his ideas to Glaucon. Socrates believed that cities have three attributes. He goes on to explain that since the attributes of a city come from the people living within, the soul must also be split into three attributes. Socrates attempts to break down the soul into three different categories; the part of the soul that learns or thinks (rational), the part of the soul that desires pleasure, and the part of the soul that is spirit.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main arguments Plato makes is that the soul has the function of “caring for things, ruling and deliberating (Republic, 353d).” He goes on to add that living is also an essential part of the soul. We can conclude from this that a good soul cares, rules, deliberates, and lives well, while a bad soul does none of these…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After considering the three distinct classes he has identified within the city, Socrates, attempts to link them to three distinct parts of the soul. "It is obvious that the same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time"(436B). He uses an example of a person who is standing still but waving his arms.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Republic of Plato, Plato considers the nature and value of justice and the other virtues as they appear in both the structure of society as a whole and in the personality of an individual human being. This city-soul analogy supplies Plato with a metaphoric language that enables him to describe aspects of the structure and dynamics of the human soul. He began with a detailed analysis of the formation, structure, and organization of an ideal state before applying its results to a description of personal life. This paper will explore how the Republic uses the description of an ideal city-state as a vehicle for explaining the harmonious operation of the human psyche, which can be likened to a city. This “psychopolis” can be well or poorly…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    (Plato, Republic) This is when Socrates explains how specialization produces a need to be just for the…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will analyze the debate in book 1 between Socrates, Cephalus and Polemarchus over the true definition of justice. In doing so, a summary of both Cephalus’s and Polemarchus’s arguments will be given as well as Socrates’s objections. Additionally, I will state why I believe Socrates’s objection was convincing. Finally, the question “what is Cephalus like as a character? What are his limitations?” will be answered through an examination of his old-fashioned, traditional Greek methodology.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato felt as the Body was a hindrance to the soul, almost as if the body is the prison of the soul. Plato believed that you need to balance all sides of the soul depending on what kind of society you live…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays