Similarities Between Rawls And Nozick

Great Essays
1.1 Thesis question
John Rawls and Robert Nozick were among the greatest political philosophers of the 20th century. Both philosophers brought forth their own ideal theory. Both philosophers had their own set of theories of what an ideal society should look like. Secondly, I will compare and contrast both the political theories with an emphasis on their understanding of freedom and justice. Thereafter, I will examine which of these theories are best suited to support the political system we find in the Scandinavian welfare system. Lastly, I will present the political theory I support.

1.2 Reasons
Kofi Anan, the seventh Secretary- General of the United Nations said, “The battle for freedom and justice is never hopeless, but it is never finally won. Every morning, we must wake up ready to fight it again.” As a future social worker, it is part of my ethical responsibility to not only seek social justice for all but to also keep myself abreast of my government’s policies. Therefore, I chose this question as I found it exciting and enlightening.

1.3 Method and Outline
…show more content…
304-356). To gain a better understanding, I also read the chapters pertaining to John Rawls’, ‘A theory of justice’ and Robert Nozick’s, ‘Anarchy, State and Utopia’ in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction (Kymlicka, 2002, p. 53-75 and p. 103-128). I have additionally spent a significant amount of time reflecting, and weighing my thoughts and impressions of the political theories in question, not least of which being how they affect our

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Many philosophical scholars believe that justice, liberty, law, and equality are an important aspect among the commonwealth of the nation. Moreover, this paper will focus on the two important political philosophers that argue with the notion and importance of equality and justice in the western society. These philosophers include: Robert Nozick and John Rawls. John Rawls claims that equality and justice is derived from an equal distribution of opportunities, income, wealth, for the general social advantage of the citizen, which includes welfare. Whereas, Robert Nozick defines equality and justice as an entailment to oneself.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critically review the arguments of Florini and Nussbaum: Nussbaum (2001) explains that the social contract theory dominates the western political philosophy and this theory considers the principles of justice as the result of contract, the people make. People make this contract for mutual benefit and live according to the rule of law.. Her main focus is on John Rawls ' work on contractual theory. Nussbaum admits that such theories have some strength in terms of global justice but these theories suffer from some structural defects and can produce imperfect results. According to John Rawl(1971), if resources are scarce and all the contractors or parties involved are equal in power, they are bound to cooperate to achieve their respective goals.…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx, John Rawls, and Robert Nozick are three prominent philosophers whose political theories have an important place in the modern political debate about the role of the state, how society should be structured and the concept of justice. Karl Marx was born 1818, his major work was The Communist Manifesto published in 1848. Marx advocated for a type of socialism called communism where the dominant goals are the abolition of private property and class antagonisms through a revolution of the proletariat or working class. John Rawls was born in 1921, his major work was A Theory of Justice published in 1971. Rawl’s defended social liberalism, egalitarianism, and the welfare state in the form of distributive justice.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By comparing utilitarian and libertarian views, Sandel is able to sift out the negative aspects of these forms of government that hinder justice. Kant’s, Rawl’s, and Aristotle’s ideas allow its citizens what makes a good…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social work professionals who work in this setting turn into monitors of public policies and social conditions. Therefore, they are fundamental in “refining the social work profession and society-at-large, regarding anticipated or unanticipated consequences that might result from public policies and practices in Canada” (Graham, Swift, & Delaney, 2003, as cited in Yee, 2016, October 20). In this context, the role of social workers is to advocate for social justice by using social policy to promote political solutions for social issues, which means that practitioners can “promote social equality and social justice not only in the service community but also in the population at large” (Graham, Swift, & Delaney, 2003, as cited in Yee, 2016, October…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that a person's liberty is what is most important and should be a priority. The second principle is called the “Difference Principle” which requires social and economic inequalities to be modified so that they can produce an outcome that is fair and equal to all. Rawls’ notion of justice as fairness demands that distribution of the goods of society should be consciously structured in order to provide a fair distribution. His last argument ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in society, this is called the social contract theory. The “original position” is the main component on Rawls’ social contract account of justice, it allows us to figure out what principle of justice people in society would agree to if we lived in a society of total freedom.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Universal Health Care

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Robert Nozick opposes Rawl’s view on the theory of justice by arguing that health care is not a right. His perspective states that people tend to seek medical treatment for more and more reasons when health care is seen as a right as opposed to a…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Charles Mills Democracy

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages

    This, he writes, is a hypothetical situation where political decision makers are rational, do not care about the affairs of their peers, have a sense of justice and what is good, and operate under a veil of ignorance. It is this same hypothetical veil of ignorance which is both the most important element to this theory working, but also what breaks it. Under a veil of ignorance, those making decisions on behalf of society will not know who they are going to be in said society. This, Rawls states, leads them to make moral decisions which, if anything, work to the advantage of the least fortunate. Unfortunately, as effective as this may actually be in addressing the issues with democracy today, there is no real way to carry this out in the real world.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rawls and Nozick: Justice as a Fair Inequality or Entitled Right? Distributive justice is the economic framework within a society which determines the distribution of goods amongst its members. How goods should be distributed and to whom have been interpreted by John Rawls and Robert Nozick, two contemporary philosophers that share the belief that there is no practical form of equal distribution of goods within society, but disagree on what constitutes a true distributive justice when taking that into consideration. The philosophers’ interpretations of distributive justice are influenced by their respective beliefs – Rawls’ principles of justice are egalitarian in nature, while Nozick’s entitlement theory is strong in its libertarian sentiments.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Robert Nozick, an American philosopher born in the 1960s, explores the concept of distributive justice through a minimalist state in his work, Anarchy, State, and Utopia. A minimal state refers to a state that obtains the least amount of power possible without becoming an anarchy. Throughout Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Nozick argues that the minimal state is the only state that can be justified and will not violate people’s rights. By exploring various theories and principles such as the Entitlement Theory and Principle of Rectification, Nozick examines where extensive states fail, therefore, proving Nozick’s belief in a minimalist state to be the most just state. Using Nozick’s arguments throughout his work, various ideals throughout Anarchy,…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Based off his own views of fairness and justice, Rawls would consider Rousseau’s ideal society fair. This conclusion is only made when considering what is at the core of Rawls’ desire for fairness: justice. Rousseau’s emphasis on security is of little concern to Rawls. However, Rousseau’s belief of liberties and equality follow Rawls’ own belief of fairness as justice. For Rawls, a practice is fair when none of those participating in it feel they are not only being compelled to give in to illegitimate claims, but also feeling they are being taken advantage of.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay I am going to explore the libertarian standpoint on justice, and consider the objections to such a rights based view of justice. Furthermore, I am going to examine how a just libertarian society would function, and consider the value of justice in comparison to the political virtues of liberty, and equality. Libertarianism promotes justice in two ways; it ponders the moral duties we have to others, but also the moral constitutional duties we have. At the crux of libertarian ideology is the belief that humans, as autonomous beings, have self-ownership, and a right to individual liberty. This motivates libertarians to believe that a minimal state is preferable to the present type of government, but also affirm that…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls theory of social justice developed over time with the publishing of various books he wrote, such as A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism. In A Theory of Justice, he determines the “Circumstances of Justice.” These circumstances assume justice applies to a “definite geographical territory and that the subjects of justice are “roughly similar in…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Rawls and Karl Marx both see equality as an important value in human society; indeed, they both see it as something people are entitled to and as the foundation upon which the ideal society is built. However, they diverge drastically in how they conceptualize the way an egalitarian society would operate and how they believe such a society could be achieved. Concerning the former, Marx envisioned a communist utopia, whereas Rawls was a strong believer in liberal democracy. In terms of the latter, Marx was a staunch believer in proletarian revolution, while Rawls believed in perfecting the existing system through democratic reforms. Their contrasting visions stem partly from the different periods in which they wrote.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout the piece, “justice as fairness” serves as the basis for the liberal approach to citizenship: Justice as fairness is intended as a political conception of justice. While a political conception of justice is, of course a moral conception… justice as fairness framed to apply to what I have called the ‘basic structure’ of a modern constitutional democracy. By this structure I mean such a society’s main political, social, and economic institutions, and how they fit together into one unified system of social cooperation. In other words, Rawls believes that a democracy will most efficiently function when each citizen develops their own moral conception of justice and go on to agreeably pursue these conceptions through diverse plans of action.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays