Justice And Injustice In Plato's The Republic

Improved Essays
Today society tend to classified everything one does as right or wrong, justice or injustice. It as simple as black or white. Do humans naturally tend to justice or injustice? The selection from Plato’s The Republic explain the view of justice illustrated by the story of Gyges’ ring. There is no solid line between right and wrong. There is no injustice or justice, only desire. “All natures deem to be their good, and are only diverted into the path of justice by the force of law.” I agree with GLAUCON view of justice.
“They say that to do injustice is, by nature, good; to suffer injustice, evil; but that the evil is greater than the good. And so when men have both done and suffered injustice and have had experience of both, not being able to avoid the one and obtain the other” GLAUCON believe that with justice come injustice. There is no such thing as just black and white. For instance, if someone does 10 justice actions and one injustice action. What is he consider?
…show more content…
Gyges have been just a normal every service to the king. Everything changed when he found the ring that gave him power to turn invisible. He then uses the power of the ring to “seduced the queen, and with her help conspired against the king and slew him, and took the kingdom.” Is his action considered injustice? Would an injustice and justice person make the same choice? GLAUCON believe that both injustice and justice person would have made the same decision. Like the saying “You’re innocent until proven guilty”. Gyges story continued “No man would keep his hands off what was not his own when he could safely take what he liked out of the market, or go into houses and lie with any one at his pleasure, or kill or release from prison whom he would, and in all respects be like a God among men.” The action of justice is the same as

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After Socrates, the protagonist in Plato’s Republic, refutes a description of justice similar to the traditional poetic view of justice made by a man named Cephalus, Thrasymachus, a well-known sophist, enters into the discussion of justice with Socrates. Thrasymachus asserts, “I proclaim that justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger” (Plato, Republic I, 338 C). For Thrasymachus, justice is only revealed through the interests of the stronger party. Whatever the stronger party dictates as being good for itself, the stronger party, is what justice is. To further elaborate on his claim, Thrasymachus uses examples of cities governed by different ruling bodies.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Everyone holds their own definition of what justice is, though the Merriam-Webster dictionary defines it, as the process or result of using laws to fairly judge and punish crimes and criminals (Merriam Webster). Although the idea of justice is connotative to good intention, Marcus Tullus Cicero author of The Defense of Injustice, shares a different perspective to the notion of justice. In a persuasive dialogue, Laelius gives Philus the challenge to defend the idea of injustice, in which Philius successfully accomplishes, establishing a powerful argument. Cicero insists that the idea of doing the right thing and having a good intention comes from human weakness and not from the idea of justice. He believes that the idea of justice…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question of justice in any situation concerning warfare is a difficult one to address, as many people hold opposing views on the righteousness of war itself. In the Aeneid, Virgil proposes a new question for readers to consider as he allows the main character, Aeneas, to undergo a change in mentality throughout the epic. The reader is forced to decide whether the killing of an opponent is deemed as just or unjust. Although many scholars have proposed differing definitions of justice, Plato provides one of the most reputable descriptions. When one utilizes the definition of justice that Plato proposes, he or she will acknowledge that Turnus and Aeneas both abide by the gods’ authority, thus promoting justice; however, after the gods’ influence…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. For some doing wrong is a sense of pleasure, rather than doing the right thing. Some people find life better to do others wrong rather than being a victim of someone who has done them wrong. Glucson makes things clear when he states that “those who practice justice do so involuntarily and because they have not the power to be unjust will best appear if we imagine something of this kind”. In other words, to my understanding he is making it clear that those who practice justice have come to an agreement for those who do things justice vs others who do wrong-doings.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Ring of Gyges narrative, Glaucon supports an argument that "whenever anyone thinks that he can safely be unjust, there he is unjust," implying that it is unnatural for a human being to follow ethical or moral principles when given freedom to do otherwise. According to his theory, it is not beneficial to be righteous or "just," as injustice and dishonesty presented as a far more lucrative option. While I agree that people do act in self-interested ways and cooperate with one another because such relation could ultimately benefit them, I do not support Glaucon's assumption that it is better to be unjust. As authors of the text point out, often it is difficult or almost impossible to determine what motivates an individual to follow certain…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Definition Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    Justice can be described as “minding your own business.” The state and the ruler is just when its three classes or parts execute its own duties and do not interfere with each other. Therefore, injustice must be the opposite or as Socrates says, “…it must be a kind of civil war between the three parts, a meddling and doing of another ’s work, a rebellion by some part against the whole soul in order to rule it inappropriately (Plato…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon is unsatisfied with the argument between Thrasymachus and Socrates regarding Justice. Thrasymachus believes Justice is for the common good, it is not for the good for an individual, that any compromise is involved. Glaucon renews Thrasymachus’ argument, he divides the good into three classes: things good in themselves, things good both in themselves and for their consequences, and things good only for their consequences. Socrates places justice in the class of things good in themselves and for their consequences without any hesitation. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove by exploring that Justice is best, not a compromise.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elaborating the Definition of Justice Plato, the Republic is about the history of political thought, it includes long conversations and arguments among several intellects. Thrasymachus, a fierce fighter, argues that justice is what is good for the stronger and that the unjust man lives a more profitable life than the just man does. Socrates, Plato’s teacher, play the role in defending justice in all these arguments. He praises justices for itself and its consequences. Next, Glaucon and Adeimantus, sons of Ariston, restore Thrasymachus’s argument in a different prospect of perfectly unjust life is better than a perfectly just life.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “To recapitulate: the idea of justice supposes two things; a rule of conduct, and a sentiment which sanctions the rule”(Mill, 45). In regards to justice there are two main factors for Mill. The first being equality and the second being punishment. The goal of punishment is to establish order and reorder of social order, and vengeance is an animalistic desire that is natural. Without equality we wouldn’t be able to regard other peoples happiness and therefore justice becomes a concept that is derived from higher-level thinking and vengeance is a mixture of animalistic thinking and abstract thinking.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The switch to the discussion of profitability changes the scale in which justice is analyzed from justice as an overarching concept to an individual in action. From his view, justice has a key role in society but for an individual it is more profitable to be unjust. As a moral skeptic, Thrasymachus doesn’t believe justice to hold an intrinsic good. For an…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice is a term that people use to describe as an act or behavior that represents the good people present to others and themselves. It serves as a moral high ground that people strive to be, although sometimes these thoughts can be twisted into its opposite and cause pain, anger, and other negative emotions and acts arise within people. This pain erupts into what is known as injustice and is the epitome of what people should not strive for due it bringing so much negativity. It is a moral choice that no one what’s to make due to the label that it puts on them making them into monsters in the eyes of others due to what they believe could have been done. Although, in some cases, injustice is sometimes the best choice in the matter if one is…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Glaucon demands that justice is not intrinsically valuable, but something we endure for the sake of the benefits it brings. He tells the myth of Gyges to provide the evidence that people think justice is rather a burden than good in itself. The point of this story is to show that if any human will have such ring, it will be perfectly in his best interests to always pick injustice over justice. Moreover, Glaucon claims that by nature, human beings are competitive and naturally they always want to make injustice. However, since in reality, there is no ring of Gyges, it is in human’s best interests to do justice, for otherwise they will end up in the chaos.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is the only virtue stated in our pledge of allegiance, and for the last two hundred and forty years we have tried to uphold this virtue in every part of our democracy, but what is justice? Meriam-Webster Dictionary says justice is the administration of law; especially: the establishment or determination of rights according to the rules of law or equity. However I believe it is more complex than that. Many philosophers have given their own definition of justice. In this essay I will look to the philosophes of Aristotle, John Locke,…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Plato’s ‘Republic’, happiness and justice are deeply questioned and analyzed as being interconnected. The broadest assumption of a happy person is one who is most wealthy and with very much power. This is almost an unspoken truth, however, does it really work out? One of the most famous Greek philosophers was Socrates, a son of a stonemason who encouraged discussion among many elite, powerful men. In the Republic written by Plato, the idea of a happy person is dissected thoroughly by Socrates and explained.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Plato and Augustine believed justice to be a prominent virtue. In Plato’s time, the majority argued that it was reputation that mattered and not the actual act of justice, and that justice itself was burdensome. To Plato, justice was practiced not as a burden, but practiced so “that anyone who is going to be blessed with happiness must love both because of itself and because of its consequences” (Plato, Republic, 358a). Augustine’s view of justice was similar; however, his take on injustice differed. While Plato did not see injustice as extremely problematic, Augustine disagreed, stating, “It is better to suffer than to commit injustice” (Augustine, On Christian Doctrine, 85).…

    • 1091 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays