Just War Analysis

Improved Essays
Eduardo Carvalho Zanello
Writ 102 Sec 004
Instructor John Herold
Just War Final Draft
21 October 2015
An Analysis of Modern Wars and the Just War Concept
The concept of just war in Western Cultures goes back to thinkers like Thomas, Cicero, and Augustine. The main goal of the principles embraced in this theory was to provide fair causes to go to war and its prosecution, and not to let people be fooled by false ideals of glory. Some concepts like “proportionality”, “just cause”, and “weapons used in war must discriminate between combatants and non-combatants” have been ignored in recent wars. The bombing of Dresden in World War II killed a large number of civilians in an area that was not a strategic military target –it didn’t have a major
…show more content…
Some of the main reasons for Iraq’s invasion, like the uncovering Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction were never proven; caused the death of many civilians and soldiers, and still left Iraq in a chaotic situation after the war. More than ever, with the power of destruction of today’s technology, we need moral justification for military action and the war conduction and its reasons must be justifiable.
Cicero was one of the first thinkers to share his thoughts about just war. He was concerned about the main reason of going to war that should be living in peace afterwards. The first individual to offer a proper theory about justice and war was Saint Augustine. He used the bible as guide to offer an
…show more content…
When they invaded that country without any authorization from the UN or any other international organization, the US and its British allies eventually place themselves outside the international legality, breaking with the principles of the Charter to which they agreed to cooperate, behaving clearly as aggressors. Breaking with the principles that guarantee the legitimacy of the use of force in the international system, the US began , even if unintentionally, a move towards the questioning about the set of rules now taken place.In her analysis about the reasons of going to war in Iraq, Esther Pan lists the following reasons: Saddam's possession of weapons of mass destruction (WMD); the threat Saddam posed to the Middle East; Iraq's links to al Qaeda; Saddam's harsh treatment of the Iraqi people; Iraq's lack of democracy; and the example a free and democratic Iraq would set for authoritarian regimes in the region. Well, no active weapons of mass destruction was found in Iraq (Drum); so Iraq was not attacking the US and also didn’t have firepower to present a future treat for the US which invalidates some of the previous reason to invade Iraq. Accordingly to Fareed Zakaria “more than 8,000 Iraqis were killed in violent attacks in 2013. That makes it the second most violent country in the world, after its neighbor Syria.” This fact shows that, even without Saddam Hussain, a lot of Iraqis are still dying because

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    What would you do, if you woke up from an after war or gun battle and your team that are more like family that teammates, are around you dead. The article “On WWII: The Horrible waste of war” by author Ernie Pyle, explains how a veteran that just have woken up from an after war on France Normandy on June 16 and 17, how he saw the major destruction the war had made, and see’s dead men everywhere from his team and the opponents, equipment scattered along the shore and on the beach. He notices how the dogs are along the shore waiting for their owner that are floating in the water, not knowing that they will never come back. When he got up on a small hill just enough high that he could see everything that he walked by and still missed some…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The consequences from the Iraq War resulted with 2,500 American deaths, tens of thousands of death of Iraqis many being civilians, humanitarian crisis, political and economic negative consequences, etc. President Bush’s reason to invade Iraq was to spread liberty around the world and to make world peace. After researching, many people do not truly do not think we had a legitimate enough reason to invade Iraq. I believe this goes back to the mentality America has of overthrowing foreign governments for ideological, political, and economic reasons. In my opinion, the Iraq War was the most compelling case for his argument of long term failure.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Walter Wink’s article “Beyond Just War and Pacifism” he does not believe war should ever be justified. He gave a helpful understanding for the complexity and opacity of human violence. In a broader view Wink sees a hidden dimension not apart from physical reality and human society but grounded within the social world. Wink calls this hidden reality “The domain of the Powers”. Wink argues that war can never be just because justice requires fairness on both sides and war there could never be that.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Iraq and War on Terror Iraq and War on Terror Military blunders seemed to always repeat itself throughout the history. Napoleon once attempted to conquer Russia, but failed. A few hundred years later, Hitler made the same mistake. In 2003, the former President George W. Bush decided to invade Iraq was a mistake, but it was not really on the scale with Napoleon and Hitler. Even though the operation was highly successful, many still doubt that the war was worth the cost for the United States and Iraq.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Desert Storm Timing

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    INTRODUCTION Timing was critical for the conduct and success of both Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom. Diplomacy made it possible for the United States and the Soviet Union to reconcile many of their differences after forty-five years of the cold-war….but it is unable to bridge the differences between President George H.W. Bush and Saddam Hussein over Kuwait. President George W. Bush’s decision to invade Iraq in 2003 was based on incorrect information−about weapons of mass destruction and a supposed nexus between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda’s terrorism−and then occupied the country negligently. Desert Storm provides an example of an administration that attempted to use their diplomatic power, while Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) is the…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just War Theory is something I believe in. However, I believe some modifications may be needed in contemporary America. Snauwaert asserts it is somewhat of a misnomer to suggest the United States is at war with terrorism because terrorism is a tactic . Thus, Snauwaert suggests the United States is at war with the practitioners of terrorism.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Is Iraq Unjust

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Originally, Iraq invaded Kuwait killing many in the process, so as protectors, the conflict is just, but the second occupation was unjust. The reason is, because we invaded under the pretense they owned "chemical," "biological," and "nuclear weapons" but this proved to be false information, so the second conflict was unjust (Mattison). Therefore the reason for invasion fall under the following criterial: just cause, comparative justice, and legitimate authority. However, after invading this intelligence proved faulty, and a new agenda of restoring Iraq, took over.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Iraq War began with the invasion of Iraq by a coalition of countries including the United States. Bush and United Kingdom Prime Minister, Tony Blair made the final decision to invade Iraq after they became concerned that Iraq was developing weapons of mass destruction. The entire mission’s objective was, "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people.” Declaring war was not their first strategy in neutralizing Iraq. Bush and Blair pled with the United Nations Security Council to call for Iraq to cooperate with United Nations weapons inspectors to ensure that the President of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, was not in possession of weapons of mass destruction.…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, key theorists such as Mary Kaldor and Martin van Creveld have criticized Clausewitz theory as being outdated and irrelative. Kaldor remarks Clausewitz theory as being stated centric, and thus not following the developments seen within ‘new war’. Kaldor argues that the shift in the main actors within war to include: warlords, criminals, and terrorists is a key feature of ‘new wars’ opposing Clausewitz state centric notion (Kaldor, 2012. p.15). In addition, Crevald has commented the presence of slow, low-intensity wars have dismissed Clausewitz further (van Creveld, 1991.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Iraq War was a conflict fought between a United States led coalition and Iraq. While the exact causes and motives are somewhat unclear, it is certain that the war was motivated by past events, such as 9/11 and the 1991 Gulf War, threats of weapons of mass destruction, and contrasts between the dictatorship of Iraq and the republic of America (Hanson). With the initial conflict over, debates have spread across the world, questioning whether the United States was justified in starting the war. The United States should not have gone to war with Iraq because of the insufficient and poorly supported reasons it had to start the conflict, the interventionalist precedent it set in both the United States and the United Nations, and the damage…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Endless War Analysis

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Torreon (Torreon, CRS 01/27/15, summary section). Regardless of whether the conflict is stand alone or part of a prolonged engagement and/or war period, a majority of these conflicts where American troops are involved do not have an associated authorization use of military force associated with them. To highlight this fact Mr. Timothy McGrath states that the United States is currently involved in 134 different operations in his 8 December 2014 article on US Foreign policy (McGrath, Global Post website). The key point is that many of these conflicts never make mainstream news accounts and are not widely known by the public; therefore no attention is ever drawn to the fact that they do not have authorizations from Congress. Based on those…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Us Vs Superpower

    • 2063 Words
    • 9 Pages

    At the turn of the 20th century, the United States was going through rapid growth in economy and society. This put the U.S. atop the globe, and it is considered to be one of the superpowers, if not the superpower. The U.S. has viewed its self as the world police, when situations come up in countries across the globe, they are one of the first countries to address it. With that they have influenced many countries and left an impact on them, some positive some negative. Two countries the U.S. had direct effects on was Haiti in the early 20th century and Iraq in the 21st century during the bush administration until today.…

    • 2063 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Today, technological advances in warfare have challenged the foundational principles of Just War Theory and generated scrutiny around ethical behavior in combatant environments. Just War Theory refers to a set of rules that a sovereign state is expected to follow before engaging in war, during war, and after war—jus ad bellum, jus in bellum, and jus post bellum, respectively. With the increased employment of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) or drone strikes under the Obama Administration, one may doubt the morality of these attacks. Specifically, the aims of this essay seek to answer the question on whether or not drone strikes in Yemen adhere to the principles of Just War Theory. Considering the unprecedented and regular use of this technology,…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even before World War One, the desire to abolish the cycle of war was apparent in civilized society. This was made apparent by William James with his essay “The Moral Equivalent of War”. In his essay, James argues through anecdotes and multiple viewpoints that another method besides warfare should be used to advance civilization. James utilizes perspective throughout his essay to strengthen his argument through an ethos appeal. Throughout his work, he consistently acknowledges two parties: pacifists and advocates of war.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Use Of Force Essay

    • 2148 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In international law, the use of force is an important factor to consider reason being because it can be very controversial. If every country were to use force because they wanted to prove a point or show another country that they are more powerful then every state would use force to get their way. An issue that highlights the use of force is the United States – Iraq war. Through resolutions, articles, customary international law, relations with terrorist groups and humanitarian intervention we will address the question, Was the use of force by the United States, United Kingdom and their allies against Iraq in 2003 legal?…

    • 2148 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays