Just Take Away Their Guns Away By James Q Wilson

Improved Essays
James Q Wilson was an American political scientist who made contribution to making urban politics, policing and crime understandable. Wilson is also known as the author of many essays, with Just Take Their Guns Away being one of them. In this essay Wilson claims and explains why it is not necessary to make more gun laws, but instead, people who do not have the right to possess one should be punished by confiscating their guns away. In the essay Just Take Away Their Guns by James Q, Wilson, Wilson argues that guns aren’t the main source of crimes, but rather people are. As he quotes the National Rifle Association, “. . . ‘guns don’t kill, people kill’. . .” (Wilson pg #127) , he makes it clear to the audience that he believes that peoples who …show more content…
. .” (Wilson pg. # 127), meaning that tougher gun control, should be enforced. But if tougher gun control should be enforced, then that dismantles his whole argument on not creating anymore tougher laws. The more people carry guns, the more violence escalades. Wilson agrees with the statement “some people carry them on the streets, others will want to carry them to protect themselves-and an urban race will be underway.” (Wilson pg. # 128)- Wilson statement does not make sense because the only way to solve this “urban race . . . underway” is to make it “draconian” and politically possible. Despite the trainings officers are given, it is morally and ethically wrong for one to assume that one is a criminal due to his appearance. The Second Amendment reads “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms” not the right of the people to keep and bear …show more content…
He makes many assumptions that all illegal carriers, are illegal users, “it should be to reduce to the number of people who carry guns unlawfully.” (Wilson pg. 126) There could be a person who unlawfully carries a gun but uses it in a self-defense situation but also have someone who lawfully carries and use it illegally. Wilson further on assumes that all law-abiding citizens are in favor of guns as he states that “our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.” (Wilson pg. 126) There are many polls being created to figure out how many of the United States citizens are actually in favor of the “. . . still tougher gun control . . .” According to pollingreports.com, Quinnipiac University, Fifty- Four percent of citizens supports and Forty- Two percent oppose tougher gun control. Throughout the essay the article depicts one sided evidence, this point is clearly portrayed when the author states that, “Moreover the rate of fatal gun accidents has been declining while the level of gun ownership has been rising.” This is inaccurate because these both work hand-in-hand, if the rate of gun ownership is rising the amount of gun accidents will also sky rocket, due to illegal confiscation of these weapons by criminals. The increase of gun ownership does not put a limitation on the malicious acts that criminals commit. Criminals will be criminals despite the circumstance. Nevertheless, the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frisking The essay “Just Take Away Their Guns” has been written by James Q. Wilson. The essay tends to highlight the political and social concerns that are associated with the carrying of a gun. The author claims that there is no need of civilians carrying a gun since it is the responsibility of law and order unit to keep security of citizens. He argues that, in case civilians are involved in the act of carrying guns, then it makes no difference amid them and criminals.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most ineffective gun laws in place today is the gun free zones act, limiting where one can bring a gun. Gun free zones are an easy target for mass killers. Gun control advocates often fail to see that guns deter criminals. For instance, John R. Lott an American economist, political commentator, and gun rights advocate puts this law it into perspective in his article “Bans don’t deter killers”: “If a killer were stalking your family, would you feel safer putting a sign out front announcing, ‘This Home is a Gun-Free Zone’? That is what schools do" (par. 5).…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Private gun ownership creates more problems than it can handle if there isn’t a law to prevent situations in which anyone who feels the urge to murder has the same opportunity to get a gun as the person who will purchase a gun in the name of self-defense. If the benefits of banning private gun ownership are greater than its perceived wrongs and the ban will help maintain order in society, then the United States should ban gun ownership. McMahan knows that the reason why there is an authorized body of defense in the country is to defend its citizens; however, if there is a rise in private individuals who own guns, the control the police has becomes ineffective. Gun advocates, he says, are the perfect partners in crime of those willing to commit a crime. There will be no way of carrying out laws that have been established because all of the citizens have the same amount of power the police have.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    William S. LaPierre from “Crime is the Basic Problem, Not Guns” claims that, “America has a crime problem, not a gun problem.” Anti-gun activists believe that by taking guns away the crime rate will drop. They believe it is too dangerous for the public especially for our children. If a new gun law were to be put in place, one that would state that guns are illegal, crime would most likely not change. People would be left defenseless against criminals.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with an article by Jeff McMahan in order to give us an analytical argument on gun control. Jeff McMahan, in his article Why Gun Control Isn’t Enough, discusses why he believes guns should not simply be controlled in the United States, rather they should be banned. McMahan makes the case that gun ownership, in its entirety, is dangerous and illogical. Through several examples and through his own reasoning, McMahan hopes to convince the reader that the only way forward on the topic of ‘guns’ in the United States is to completely ban civilians from owning traditional firearms, from the ground up. Through my counter-argument, I intend to show that while McMahan’s argument is versed well on intent, it is mostly normative,…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although this may be true, the Second Amendment has become the object of some study itself. Correlating with the predicament of whether it recognizes the right of each citizen to keep and bear arms. Opposing to, whether the right belongs solely to state governments and empowers each state to maintain a military force (Vandercoy, 2016). At the same time, it leaves the question unresolved of what the founders really had in mind when they conscripted this cutting edge declaration. With attention to that, the phenomenon has soared into heights beyond a meer debatable matter.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also defends his opinion saying the only thing stricter gun laws will do is prevent law abiding citizens from being able to purchase guns. In his essay, James Q. Wilson…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns vs People “ Guns don’t kill people; people kill people”. It is a phrase often heard among the opponents to gun control in the United States. Weapons have been seen as an element of subsistence or defense against any threat, and every day we hear or see related violent crimes involving firearms.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no question that from our President to our local congressman everyone is feeling the pressure to find any solution for a situation that many Americans feel is out of control, but the bottomline remains a constant, 67% of Americans do not want to lose their constitutional right to have and own the guns of their…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    gun use is out of control. During interviews to estimate the number of citizens possessing firearms, most respondents usually give false responses because they know that giving true responses could reveal that the gun control laws are ineffective resulting in the implementation of more strict laws (Lott 37). The strict laws would make it difficult to own a gun, which would make them feel insecure. In most cases, studies done to analyze the potential effects of gun possession do not reveal the true situation, which makes it difficult for the government to fight the issue of gun possession (Kleck &…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay, “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson a Management and Policy professor at UCLA, argues that legally owned guns are not the problem, in fact the real problem lies with society ignoring the usage of illegal guns. The purpose of this essay is to convey to society that gun crimes can be stopped before a shot is fired, that it does not entitle a huge stack of forms at the local gun store. Wilson effectively argues that legally owned guns are necessary for citizens to protect themselves, reasonable police frisks should be in place to stop illegal gun use before the crime is committed and ultimately guns agitate the situation making crimes worse. The authors credibility and logical appeal are overall effective, in spite of the lack of emotional appeal or connection to the audience. Despite the absence of Pathos, the author conveys an adequate amount of logic, which carries the paper to an effective and persuasive conclusion.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative “You can have all the gun control laws in the country, but if you don’t enforce them, people are gonna find a way to protect themselves. We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons. It’s not the law-abiding citizens, it’s not the person who uses it as a hobby” (Steele). There are around 100,000 victims of gun violence each year (“Brady Campaign...”). Action needs to be taken so Americans don’t feel unprotected going into a public environment.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Research Paper

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An incendiary debate has been sparked regarding current gun control legislation in the United States, because approximately 30,000 United States citizens lose their lives to gun-related crime and injury every year (Terror). The question is whether gun control laws should be strengthened to make it harder for potential criminals to possess weapons or kept the same to preserve the rights of the United States citizens. Gun control opponents believe that the answer to this problem is to loosen gun control laws to dissuade potential shooters. Gun control proponents believe that the answer is to tighten gun control laws so that a gun is never put into a potential shooter’s hands. To examine this issue, one must carefully ponder different points of…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics