Jury Fairness

Improved Essays
These instructions to the jury are not only virtuous because they illustrate the virtues of neutrality and impartiality by instructing the jury to only consider the evidence and to not be influenced when deliberating by any preconceived notions, influences, or prejudices. These instructions also envelop the common practice employed by judges of “dispassion” to prevent “emotion from exerting any influence" wherever such opportunities exist in order to maintain fairness and equality to all in the courtroom regardless of standing or background.
This admonition and instruction by Judge Ito to the jury also alludes to the virtue of testimonial justice described by Miranda Fricker in Epistemic Injustice in that the jury and as well as the judge
…show more content…
Simpson, and/or other witnesses in the case). Becoming a judicially virtuous judge is a demanding endeavor and …show more content…
These include the commitment to justice, having a commitment to the judicial profession, and being efficient managers. The commitment to justice is explained in Ms. Nelson’s article as having an “eye” to the main principle of the judicial system and this is “to serve justice.” She elaborates on this idea that the best judges will look beyond the common practices and seek out improvements to better serve justice. Remaining committed to the judicial profession means that judges “seek to advance their training” in their judicial positions to become better judicial officers and are also “eager to share their learning and experiences” with their peers. This quality not only is not only a good measure to ensure a judge remains a student of the law, but also helps their colleagues to improve as well, which positively affects the judicial system as a whole through collaborative improvement and mentorship. Judges possessing the quality of efficient management will allow them to not only effectively organize their own time, the cases on their docket, and their clerks and other legal assistants. A judge possessing this characteristic shows that they are not only responsible and respectful of their own time, but they are also conscious of ensuring they maintain the productivity of their legal staffers and the court’s docket. In the article “What makes a Good Judge?” Jane Nelson, the Director of Degree Program, and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “I do believe to be a judge you must be a lawyer first to know what you are doing as judge,” she said. “For example lets say someone has to rule on questions about evidence, the decision has to be made a quick and I having tried of a lot cases I’m familiar with how cases should be ruled.” With those experience in mind Theall suggested a change in requirement to the 10 years of practicing law that is required to run for the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeal. “There is a minimum of 10 years to run for this positions,” she said. “You do not know you are as a lawyer in 10 years…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dynamic Vs Dynamic Court

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Some cases in the Supreme Court’s history stand out more than others. The case of Microsoft v. AT&T is an example of such a case. This case, which resulted in a major and influential ruling on the inclusion of software coding in patent laws, is an example of a dynamic ruling. This claim will be further explored, but first it is necessary to build an understanding of the meaning of both the dynamic and constrained perspectives. 1.…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this model, judges act purely according to their own viewpoints, beliefs and preferences regardless of their court coworker’s reaction and response. For this reasons, this model of judicial behavior seems to lack theoretical consistency and reasoning. Judges’ policy preferences have a significant and possibly larger role in the judicial decisions making process (Ivers). Thus, legal considerations are also relevant in this process and cannot be ignored due to the fact that judges make decisions inside a legal framework.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On Friday June 10, 2016 Passaic County Superior Court Judge Joseph Portelli presided over a case involving an a young adult accused of theft. The trial itself was fairly routine, however while giving his deliberation, Portelli proceeded to engage the defendant in small talk. For no more than a minute the two gentlemen discussed the latter’s career of working in a local pizza place. It cleared the air for some jokes to be made but it was also oddly out of place for a courthouse setting. Shockingly enough this wasn’t the first time Portelli made off-topic comments during trials.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Book Review Of Just Mercy

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bryan Stevenson is not only an author but a human rights lawyer who founded and currently serves as the Executive Director of the Equal Justice Initiative located in Montgomery, Alabama. The non-profit organization fights against the racial and poverty discrimination that occurs in the United States justice system. Bryan Stevenson has done multiple interviews including one with 60 Minutes with Walter McMillian and made an appearance on TED to talk about the injustice that occurs. Through reading his book, Just Mercy, the reader will see the truth about what it is like to be in the justice system and will not only be shocked by the information that Stevenson has witnessed and experienced firsthand, but will also be appalled with how cases and…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The key topic that is under debate throughout this paper is jury nullification and how its procedures work within the justice system, as well as some of its strengths and weaknesses. There is quite a bit of controversy surrounding jury nullification being used as a primary rectification in the justice system as it tends to make equal outcomes become unequal outcomes. Jury nullification is a process in which a jury reaches a verdict of not guilty despite the fact that the defendant is actually guilty of the actions he or she is being charged for. The jury nullifies a law that is believed to be immorally wrong or wrongfully applied to the defendant.…

    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Case Analysis

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Final Recommendation – Justify and Strategies My final recommendation for resolution is for Juror 3 to be objective regarding the case without his deep and hurt feelings that he has for his son. I would hope he would be less stubborn and not have his clouded judgement in making a decision. It was not until another juror said, “He’s not your boy; he’s somebody else. Let him live,” did he finally, change his predetermined position and said, “All right, not guilty.”…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We are told that laws are here to protect us and the common good, but what if certain laws harm us? Slavery was considered a constitutional right and was upheld many times in court even thought massive amounts of Northern disagreed with the laws. And rightfully so! Should they have respected these laws that made people property? I hope not.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After watching the movie Muhammad Ali’s Greatest Fight, many of the events/situation that occurred between the Supreme Court Justices and law clerks surprised me. First, I was fascinated by Justice Harlan’s law clerk, Kevin Connolly’s tenacity and idealistic attitude during the process of rejecting and accepting the case, Clay v. the United States. For instance, Connolly’s bravery was demonstrated when he tried to dismiss his responsibility to write the brief directed by Justice Harlan due to his political ideology.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being a judge is regarded as one of the most prestigious professions in the world. Depending on the court, whether the judgeship is state or federal, and the state, there are many different processes used for how judges take their office. Judicial selection has been a topic for discussion as people argue about which selection method is superior and why. As a proposal to Governor O’Malley, I will offer my opinion on which method should be used for the Maryland State Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, examine other methods, and ultimately provide why my solution is the ideal choice for judicial selection.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judges have a multitude of responsibility beyond what many may think is only presiding behind the bench in a robe (Bohm & Haley, 2011). Other responsibilities judges have that are commonly known are determining probable cause, signing warrants, informing suspects of their rights, setting and revoking bail, arraigning defendants, and of course accepting guilty or not guilty pleas (Bohm & Haley, 2011). Judges have offices known as chambers, and they spend a significant amount of time in those rooms conferring with prosecutors and defense attorneys (Bohm & Haley, 2011). Even with all these responsibilities, nothing outweighs the task of ensuring that due process is followed and the accused are afforded a fair and legal trial (Bohm & Haley,…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The justice system of America is constantly criticized for being unfair. The establishment of an unfair justice system is due to bias and bigotry. The play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose shows the prejudices of the system as twelve different men, from different past, must concur and make a verdict on a murder case. The author indicates that the justice system is unfair through biases portrayed in the juror’s dialogue, past history, and attitude in making a verdict.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The general argument made by Paul Mendelle in his work is that juries promote democracy and give a taste of judicial system to ordinary, everyday people. More specifically Mendelle argues that juries are the most fair, effective, and efficient system to convict people of crimes they have or have not committed. He writes “ There is no other part of the constitution that is so open to the public, where ordinary people participate in decisions of suc immediate importance and wield real power. ”(line 23-25) In this passage Mendelle is suggesting that in the court system people of all kinds are able to obtain control of another person’s fate and that this is the system that is working for our democratic country.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, it is debated whether or not judicial corruption is a problem in America. We need to know the facts if we want true justice even if we aren’t victims ourselves, because justice will never be true unless all people can believe in it. To understand the incredible amount of injustice by corruption, let us focus on judges who have been indicted for such a crime, the amount of power judges have, and most importantly why ‘we…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics