Juror 8: The Guilt Of Twelve Angry Men

Improved Essays
At the beginning of the jury deliberation every single man but one believed that this particular case would result in a unanimous guilty verdict. When the men went around the table to announce their verdicts of guilty or not guilty every man raised their hand in a guilty verdict besides one. Juror eight was the only man who walked into that deliberation room with doubts about whether or not the boy did in fact murder his father. Every man that was apart of the jury had their own reasons as to why they believed with every ounce of their being that the verdict was nothing other than guilty. Along with those men and their particular beliefs as to why the boy was guilty also came a window into the men’s lives. As many do in the world, these men …show more content…
The old man that testified seeing the boy run out of the apartment also claimed that he heard the young boy scream “I am going to kill you,” then the sound of a body hitting the floor. Juror eight had already proved to the other men that this witness was lying about seeing the boy run out of the apartment. Juror eight made the point that the old man had a limp and could not have made it out of his bedroom within the time that he testified to. Juror eight reenacted the scene and timed how long the old man with his limp would take to get up out his bed then door the hall to the door. It took juror eight 45 seconds. This always displayed logos due to the fact that logically through the reenactment the old man could of not made it to the hall to see the boy free the scene in 20 seconds. The old man also testified hearing the boy yell, “I’m going to kill you shortly before hearing the body hit the floor. Juror three is the most passionate in the room when involving this case. The entire film up until the very end wants to see the young boy get the death penalty. Juror 3 explodes with rage against juror 8’s reasons as to why the young boy is in fact innocent and says, “He has to burn, he is slipping right through our fingers”. Juror 8 fires back saying to him that he is a self appointed public avenger and with rage juror three lunges for juror and screams the words, “I’ll kill him!” With the calmest tone of voice someone could have had with man lunging at them in rage, juror eight simply replies with, “You don’t really mean you’ll kill me, do you?” The words shouted by juror 3, “He has to burn, he is slipping right through our fingers” is an example of pathos because he is trying to create fear in the rest of the jurors eyes because he can see that the non guilty votes are continuing to grow. This is also a crucial turning point in the film because juror eight is making logically points

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This demonstrates prejudice because according to the 8th Juror, the 3rd Juror is being prejudice since he just desires the boy’s death for his own personal reasons. Additionally, the fact that he doesn’t refute it shows that it is probably true. Another time when the 3rd Juror demonstrates prejudice is at the end of the story. He states, “The phrase was “I’m gonna kill you.” That’s what he said.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is very important because it gives the possibility that someone else might have committed the murder rather than the boy. This also gets some of the other jurors that little extra push to get them to join the non-guilty side. Literary Conclusion: In conclusion, Juror Five’s change in personality from Act One to Act Three is a crucial part in the Jurors deliberations Value: Twelve Angry Men describes what many of us fail see in social situations, dynamic personalities. And the effect these can have on a discussion, or in this case, a life. Many Jurors seem to stay static throughout the play, such as Juror Eight or Seven.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Juror 8

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As the play progresses, readers learn of Juror 11’s origin because he consistently comments on the principles of America and why he came to the Land of the Free. Futhermore, Juror 11’s interaction with Juror 5 on page 246 insinuates Juror 11 has faced mistreatment prior to his arrival to America. Audience members sympathize with Juror 11 due to his submissive personality, which is revealed through Rose’s syntactical expertise. With lines shorter than the other jurors, Juror 11 speaks when it is necessary: “I think it was eight o’clock. Not seven” (227), “Perhaps this is not the point” (231), “I would think about ten seconds, perhaps” (235), and “Perhaps if we could see it...…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All evidence directs the boy to the electric chair. Therefore, the defendant in Twelve Angry Men is guilty of the killing of his father. He's found guilty due to him being witnessed killing his father, the purchase of a life and the loss of memory suspicion. Two people witnessed the young man kill his own father. During the time of the crime a women say the boy kill his father from across the street, along with an older gentleman below the boy's apartment over hear the killing.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By doing this he was able to create doubt against all the jurors. It all started when Juror 8 raised his hand and voted “not guilty” and said, “There were eleven votes for ‘guilty’. It’s not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it” (Rose 12). By having doubt and wanting to look at the case from multiple perspectives, Juror 8 was able to start a conversation and. On the other hand, Juror 3 seemed to be convinced as soon as he walked to the courtroom.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juxtaposing, Juror 3 shows courage in the play 12 Angry Men when one by one the other jurors are swayed to vote innocent. He stands by his verdict and strongly defends himself. Even though he was unconsciously judges the defendant based on prior experiences with children, he still stands firm in his decision that the boy…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Essay

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Juror 3’s actions is what reveals to the audience that he has an extreme disliking towards the defendant. Juror 3 says, “You can't turn now. A guilty man’s going to be walking the streets. A murderer! He’s got to die!…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Similarly, juror three has prejudice against the defendant as this boy reminds him of his estranged sons perceived ingratitude and he rails against every argument that does not support what he already believes because “that’s how kids are nowadays”, although this is only revealed as the play…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the nearly final scene, Juror #3 rips up a picture he has of his son. We do not know exactly why, but it is evident that Juror #3 holds a grudge against his son. His son is brought up at the beginning of the story but is touched on very lightly. We learn at the end of the movie that the feelings Juror #3 had towards his son were being reflected onto the teen on trial. Having more of a backstory for this juror can make the audience sympathize him and understand why he is how he is.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #2 finds it “interesting that he’d find a knife exactly like the one the boy bought”(24). Afterwards, the 8th Juror suggests that the elderly man, one of the witnesses, lied because of the point Juror #3 tried to make. Juror #3 says, that the elderly man “[ran] to his door and [saw] the kid tearing down the stairs fifteen seconds after the killing”(42). Juror #8 then suggests that the elderly man could not have done that because of his stroke. He then decides to recreate what the elderly man said he did on the night of the murder.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Several of the jurors get up to see it better.)” (Rose 39). The actions of the jury demonstrate that although they might not care as much as they should for the boy since Juror #8 cares, they are willing to listen. Juror #8 argues the evidence given throughout the trial to prove not guilty with reasonable doubt. This sets both plays a part in the sense that John does not have supporting evidence to prove his ideas while Juror #8…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another vote is now taken, resulting in nine votes in favor of not guilty with three in favor of guilty. The next case proven wrong comes from the woman across the el tracks. She says she saw the murder happen but would not have been wearing her glasses at the time so she must have simply seen a blur. Juror Eight says, “Now maybe she honestly thought she saw the boy kill his father. I say that she only saw a blur.”…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, they start talking about the knife that was used to kill the victim. All evidence points out that the knife was purchased by the boy and that he used it to kill his dad. Even though the boy said that he lost the knife, the jury is convinced that it is the same knife because it is a very rare and unique one, but then the juror #8 takes out of his pocket and exact look like knife, staying that he bought it at a pawn shop at the boy’s neighborhood pointing out that there is a possibility that anyone could have used a similar knife to kill the victim. At this moment some of the men start to doubt about their judgement. Then, juror #8 calls out for another voting, so they can find out if somebody has change his mind.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    but there is time constraint and group think has been taken place in the movie. Juror 3 is a biased against the 19-year old boy and he stands strongly in his vote of guilty. As a juror, he has an expected to assist the judge to give a fair trial.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics