Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Case

Improved Essays
Jurisdiction This paper will define jurisdiction and train investigators in the topic. The U.S. Attorney’s Office believes in training investigators in this particular subject. The power of jurisdiction granted by the U.S. Supreme Court to lower courts to hear cases. We have a subject located in our neighboring state we are wanting to properly arrest, but before we do so training investigators in this matter.
Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Personal Jurisdiction
For the most part Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Personal Jurisdiction deal with federal court jurisdiction. Governed by Article III of the Constitution and 28 USC§§ 1331 AND 1332. In order for a court to have jurisdiction overt all parties involved, they must be connected to
…show more content…
v. Washington (U.S. Supreme Court): Washington State sued for unpaid contributions to the State’s unemployment compensation fund. International Shoe alleged that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The Supreme Court held that an exercise of personal jurisdiction over a party can be premised on minimum contacts with the forum state.
Quasi in Rem Jurisdiction:
• Jurisdiction over the value of property; plaintiff much attach seized defendant property before court can have jurisdiction.

Example: Javier is domicile in Texas; Greg is domicile in Arkansas. Greg has a bank account

in Texas with $100,000 in it. Then Javier files a claim against Greg in Texas court for $200,000. Assuming that the Texas court has no basis for personal jurisdiction over Greg, the Texas court may only exercise quasi in rem jurisdiction over the $100,000 bank account, and not the entire $200,000 claim. Javier could bring just the $100,000 claim. However, to sustain the full $200,000 claim, he would have to either find another basis for the Texas court’s personal jurisdiction over Greg, or bring the action in another court, such as Arkansas court, that has personal jurisdiction over Greg. See Shaffer v. Heiner, 433 U.S. 186, 97 S. Ct. 2569, 53 L.Ed.2d 683 (1977).
In Rem Jurisdiction:
• Jurisdiction over the property itself within the state’s
…show more content…
Generally, the property must be located in the same county as the court for it to have in rem jurisdiction.
Criminal Cases The government initiates a criminal case, through the U.S. attorney’s office, in coordination with law enforcement agencies. All alleged criminal behavior is brought to the local police, FBI, or other appropriate law enforcement agency. Some examples include theft, assault, robbery, trafficking controlled substances and murder. Defendant is convicted if guilty and acquitted if not guilty, the jury decides. Only the defendant may appeal a court’s verdict. The prosecution is not allowed to appeal. The jury must unanimously agree before defendant is convicted.
Civil Cases Civil cases are generally brought by private citizens or corporations seeking to collect money owed or collect monetary damages. Some examples of civil case include landlord/tenant disputes, divorce proceedings, child custody proceedings, property disputes, personal injury, etc. Civil cases settle personal or business matters when an individual or group feels wronged by a defendant or can’t come to an agreement on a legal matter. Then the plaintiff files civil complaint, or a formal request asking the court to intervene, this often leads to a lawsuit. See, Roe v. Wade,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Oliver Vs Brock Case Study

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A civil suit is commonly derived from a private party or individual, who alleges damages from duty of care. Once a civil case begins, it is the duty of the plaintiff to prove, with evidence, duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Conversely, the defendant must prove their affirmative defense against documented allegations. The Oliver versus Brock case proves the importance of supporting evidence as opposed to hearsay statements, to prove the truth of the matter. In the Oliver versus Brock case, Cathy (Plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against Bryan Whitfield Memorial Hospital of Demopolis and the treating physicians Dr. F.S. Whitfield, Dr. Paul Ketcham and Dr. E.C. Brock (Defendant) for negligence of care.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Us Vs Russell Case

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Supreme Court case, United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423 (1973), Respondent Richard Russell was charged with three counts of a five-count indictment on behalf of unlawfully manufacturing and processing the drug methamphetamine. The controversy that surrounds this case derives from the respondent, Richard Russell’s decision to argue the legal term known as entrapment (United States v. Russell, 1973). This specific term is typically used when a Law enforcement agent induces an individual to commit an offense, where the individual would have unlikely committed it otherwise (United States v. Russell, 1973). The case United States v. Russell, involving an undercover law enforcement agent, also known as Joe Shapiro, made the decision to…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are three important considerations the appropriate courts have in this lawsuit against Novelty Now, Funny Face and Chris, Matt, and Ian: Personal jurisdiction is, the court can exercise judicial power and can sue the defendant. In the case of, Mr. Margolin filed a lawsuit in New York against Novelty Now and Chris, Matt and Ian. The personal jurisdiction can be waived for Chris, Matt and Ian that live in California and has a contract with Novelty Now located in Florida. Being that Chris, Matt and Ian sell their product from the internet website, they wouldn’t meet the criteria for personal jurisdiction nor would Novelty Now. When Long-arm jurisdiction is exercise jurisdiction over a state, the defendants, whether on a statutory basis…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Petitioners Vs Choctaw

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Dollar General argued that it is insignificant whether a tribal court assures fundamental fairness to litigants, or whether a non member has agreed to tribal jurisdiction. Dollar General, in its oral argument, took the argument further and claimed that no tribal court can use civil jurisdiction on non tribe members because the Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction to evaluate tribal court decisions. The short claims that American law can not hold an American citizen deprived of property without a neutral meeting and that tribal courts are not unbiased. Dollar General marked the matter as a tort claim, in its petition for certiorari. Dollar General did this to avert attention from the fact that the company had agreed to the application of tribal law under the lease.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American criminal justice system enforces our laws and keeps watch over us but who is watching over the system? Oversight over the system may after all, be less than optimal going by various criminal cases tainted by prosecutorial misconduct resulting in wrongful convictions. From law enforcement, the elected officials, the court system, to corrections, prosecutorial misconduct gained notoriety because of the absolute immunity they enjoy. According to Silverglate, (2000), “We now live in a time of sharply decreasing faith in the criminal justice system.” This decreasing faith might not be unconnected to the egregiously bad behavior that dots the criminal justice landscape.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The first part of the process is the police (Schmalleger & Smykla, 2015). This is where the crime is reported, investigated, and evidence is collected and protected (The National Center for Victims of Crime, 2017). This is where the offender may be arrested or charged on probable cause.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For many years throughout history, much debate and controversy has been sparked with respect to Canada’s correctional system and criminal justice system. Canada’s criminal justice system has thrived/strived to work as a consolidated unified entity aimed at reducing, maintaining, and preventing crime and criminal activity. However, great controversy remains as to whether or not Canada’s criminal justice system is effective. It can be argued, for example, that Canada’s system of criminal justice is aimed at striving to achieve and meet specified goals, entities, or principles. In terms of sentencing a criminal offender, for example, sentencing can either be based on the principles of crime control or due process.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay a discussion will be explored about the benefits and problems associated with police use of discretion. Which current policing strategies have the most potential for controlling officer discretion and providing accountability, and which have the least, and why is that the case? And finally, how might these issues impact the various concerns facing law enforcement today? Police behavior is different across all communities.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Duel Court System

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Constitution or federal laws (under federal-question jurisdiction); • Cases between citizens of different states if the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 (under diversity jurisdiction); and • Bankruptcy, copyright, patent, and maritime law cases.” In situations when federal and state courts both possess jurisdiction; the involved parties to choose state court or to federal court venue. Supreme Court and Jurisdiction…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction This paper will define what statutory criminal law is on the state and federal levels of government. This paper will also look at the states authority to enact criminal laws by statute, and what the states limitations are in doing so. This paper will further explore the federal government’s authority to enact statutory criminal laws and what its limitations are. Lastly, this paper will describe what powers political subdivisions have in making statutory criminal laws.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Standing To Sue Case Study

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Writing Assignment 3 2.1 Standing to Sue Facts: An Idaho couple, Jack and Maggie Turton, purchased a house in Jefferson County directly across from a gravel pit. Years later the county converted the pit into a landfill that collected environmentally harmful trash including: major appliances, animal carcasses, containers with hazardous content, leaking car batteries, and waste oil. The couple complained to the county but the county refused to act.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Plaintiff in this case has failed to form a prima facie case that either general or specific jurisdiction exists over the Defendant. The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) was granted and the Defendant was given leave to amend. In order for a District Court to hear a case it must have jurisdiction.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issues are whether there is an exception regarding to the majority rule and proper plaintiff rule in Foss v Harbottle? In the cases of Foss v Harbottle provides two types of rule which is “majority rule” and “proper plaintiff rule”. “Majority rule” is the majority shareholder decisions and choices over the minority shareholders. The majority votes from the shareholder within the company are ¾ of voting rights which is 75 %.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The goal of civil law is to resolve disputes between parties (individuals or entities).2 For example, in the preceding illustration, you had a dispute with a fellow student. The civil law system allows you, the injured party, to resolve your dispute in a civilized, orderly fashion. Without this option, you might be tempted to ‘‘take matters into your own hands.’’ The defendant in a civil case does not have to worry about the possibility of incarceration. On the other hand, incarceration and fines represent the goals of criminal law.…

    • 1591 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wade. This case happened in 1973, when Roe V wade ruled unconstitutional to a state law which banned abortion unless it was to save the life of the mother. It began on a lawsuit against Henry wade, which claimed that the texas law violated Roe’s constitutional rights. Roe claimed that although her life wasn’t endangered her pregnancy made it hard to travel out of state since she couldn’t afford it and she had a right to terminate her pregnancy. Although the Texas federal court ruled that the law Abortion…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays