The Extinction Of Species In Jurassic Park

Improved Essays
As biotechnology continues to advance, a matter that interests both genetic and conservation scientists is the de-extinction of species, or the resurrection of lost species. The idea of Jurassic Park, a 1993 American film where genetic scientists created a wildlife park with cloned dinosaurs, is no longer science fiction. It is becoming an increasingly considered possibility, and with the present-day extinction rate of species higher than ever, scientists have commenced to ponder the prospect of not only conserving current species and ecosystems, but also reintroducing species that have died out in the past. The technological innovations made in the field of biotechnology have made the resurrection of extinct species a viable possibility …show more content…
It is important to note that animals are a part of our ecosystem, not only do they contribute to the ecosystem and help to balance the ecosystem, but they also have many uses in our daily lives. It is also essential to realize that ecosystems are undergoing constant change: Viruses strike, natural disasters destroy nearby communities, and species go extinct. In many instances, ecosystems carry on as they were, with some species making small modifications to their behavior to make up for the loss. Sometimes the changes are more drastic and the relationships between organisms are reconstructing. It’s a shocking thing to witness, organisms and ecosystems shifting around us, but this isn’t anything new. It’s been happening since the beginning of life. Not only are individuals attempting to restore nature to a balance that doesn’t seem to exist, but they’ve picked a rather a arbitrary point in time to return it to: the moment when people first started paying attention. The only species we are capable of resurrecting are those that we know went extinct, those large and common enough to leave fossils, and those that we watched die off. So you see a familiar cadre of de-extinction candidates on the list: mammoths, passenger pigeons, thylacine tigers. These are all big animals that we are sure used to be around because they are large enough to leave an impact on human culture—This suddenly is less about the species themselves and more about us. But why shouldn’t it be, if we’re the ones causing so much damage? Sure, people have caused many recent extinctions, as our species spreads and displaces others. And because we are aware of our actions, we have a moral obligation to try to not drive species to extinction. But to say that our extinctions are worse than any other extinctions is a display of narcissism. Extinction is part of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Have you ever heard of the West African Black Rhinoceros? As of 2011 this species is extinct and society could have prevented it (Gerkens). The species is thought to have died off, because of poaching, but taking precautions could have prevented their extinction. This is just one example of Earth’s deterioration with irreversible consequences that could have been averted. Societies use Earth and all of its resources and expects no repercussions.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This Reawakening Extinct Species documentary tells us about the scientists that want to bring back the disappeared species in this planet. Ben Novak, a dozen worldwide was working on de extinction, and his goal is to bring back this extinct species. He was working on the passenger pigeon. Novak found around 5 billions of these birds in early 1800s in the United States, but ironically after 50 years, they were extinct. In this documentary, it also tells us that the DNA only last about 100.000 years, therefore; scientist now more focused on species that extinct within that period of time.…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We hold more merit to ourselves than endangered species like Ailuropoda melanoleuca to the point where we have almost caused their extinction. There are many points of view that have suggested ethical reasons for trying to stop a rapid decline in biodiversity. Most…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carl Zimmer, a TED presenter whom is not in favor for de-extinction states that, “De-extinction could possibly be worth examining, but where would we put the species?” Carl Zimmer states the pros, the cons and the outcome of de-extinction. Additionally, he talks about bringing the Red River Softshell turtle back, but if the turtle is brought back to life and put back in the same place it was originally from, the species will die off again. At first, I thought de-extinction was a good idea, but new species will face many problems because, their living conditions. Also, the impact on species that are brought back could possibly be a hazard for currently living species because, they could be invasive and make several species go…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Years ago, species such as the Pyrenean Ibex, Passenger Pigeon, and the Wooly Mammoth used to roam the very same earth that we humans walk today. These species, along with many others have gone extinct over the course of time and now only fossils remain. However, Scientists are using biotechnology in an attempt to bring these species back from the dead. This process is known as de-extinction. De-Extinction, also known as resurrection biology, is the scientific process of resurrecting species that have died out, or gone extinct (Britannica).…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “Pointless” Artificial Creation The matter of cloning reached a peak when CEO of BioArts International, Lou Hawthorne, announced to his company that they were no longer offering dog-cloning services by giving demand of cloning for a an uninterested market and unethical competition between international markets as one of the reasons for the stoppage. A similar situation of total disregard to organism creation through laboratorial procedures was observed in Ehrlich’s article talking about the case against de-extinction (a branch similar to cloning and In-vitro fertilisation), wherein he clearly specifies “it’s a fascinating but dumb idea” and talks about if extinct species were to be revived, the endangered ones would definitely be affected. Stewart Brand, the author for de-extinction, might have been right when stating that the restoration of extinct species would allow the future generations to gain knowledge about their ancestors and give human’s a possibility for “conservation” of lost-species, but it all boils down to whether the money, which Brand did not evaluate, would be enough to create this cause. The CEO and Ehrlich were correct since organism development through research and lab work,…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    De-extinction is something that is being thought about by scientists around the world, but some are thinking differently than others. There are two sides to de-extinction: if it should or should not be done. Scientist and even just regular, not fully informed people are debating about this on a daily basis. Some believe it's something that we should do this to "restore traditional values, strengthen families, and encourage education", while others believe that "Being able to do something doesn’t mean we should do it"(Counterpoint para 8). There are various points that support these two ideas quite well, but the stronger opinion is that it shouldn't be done.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On De-Extinction

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Over the past few decades, many animals have become extinct either due to natural causes or humans. Recently scientists and researchers believe that animals can be brought back to existence through a process called de-extinction. Some believe that bringing them back to life will make up for the wrong of extinction as stated in Text 1 : 3Q The Ethics of Species ‘De -Extinction’ by Angela Herring. However others claim that because of de-extinction, extinct species are being brought back but millions of other species in the ecosystem are at risk of extinction, stated in Text 3 : Case against Species Revival. Extinct species should not be brought back into existence because it will put many species at risk and will create controversy in…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although, de-extinction could replenish various areas around the world, it could also deplete many areas. After conducting projects on critically endangered species and doing research on the idea, it is safe to say that de-extinction will have more costs than benefits. De-extinction could add to more issues into the world if the new species created is invasive in areas where endangered species live which would lead to more extinctions. Furthermore, the cost of cloning a species is very expensive and the outcomes could be inaccurate. De-extinction is an unfolding idea that could help the world or harm the…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientists gathered to discuss the technological advances occurring which will likely lead to beginning de-extinction projects. Several experts expressed there worries about this possibility, including one crucial element that many tend to skim over - the cost of the project. For anyone new to the debate on de-extinction, this piece offers a brief overview of the process used and voices the concerns the scientific community has regarding it. Although I could find very little information on our author, the report comes from the Ecological Society of America, leading us to believe that she is qualified to be writing on this…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cloning endangered species to save them is a horrible idea, doing this will bring back species that could go through more pain, or be very bad for our health, to contradict, all animals deserve a chance to survive without interference by the more intelligent species’. There are pros and cons to this controversial issue. Many people want to see dinosaurs again, but do not realize how dangerous they can be. But sometimes humans are stupid enough to wipe out an entire species in a matter of decade; oops.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, humans should take the full responsibility for creating this disaster that impacts the sustainability of the earth. In the past, individuals and organizations have taken the initiative to protect endangered animals by restoring their habitats. Cloning technology will enable the expansion of these animals’ population so that they are unlikely to become extinct. It is unfortunate that museums have become one of the few places to learn about some species because they have become extinct.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Success in de-extinction could mean advancements in genetic engineering, which contributes to a wide range of medical therapy and research, as well as agricultural studies. Treating genetic diseases such as Tay-Sachs in children and helping to accelerate growth time in plants are just two of the many ideas that de-extinction through genetic engineering could help advance. Another positive outcome of reviving extinct species would be the additional source available to scientists who are studying evolution. It could provide more insight into how exactly evolution…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, the survival rate of embryos that undergo genetic engineering is 1 – 30% which results in a high volume of animals required to successfully create a genetically modified animal that is of scientific significance (Ormandy, Dale & Griffin 2011). This challenge the Three R’s principle and scientists have yet to create a genetic engineering procedure that is both successful and effective(Ormandy, Dale & Griffin 2011). Along with advancements, there has been a rapid increase of use of genetically modified animals for research or creation of (Ormandy, Dale & Griffin 2011). Another widespread issue is the revival an extinct species that does not belong in this era would cause devastating events for not only the organism but for humans as well. Ecosystems have changed and current biomes may not be able to accommodate the needs of the organisms if it is revived (Minteer 2014).…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientists are capable of bringing extinct species back to life. Some people believe making species de-extinct is a good idea because it could be used for pharmaceutical purposes and provide real life examples of extinct species. However, bringing these extinct species back to life is really detrimental to the environment and the people in it because it’s a waste of time and money, it’s dangerous to pre-existing beings, and it’s not environmentally possible to achieve. The idea of bringing extinct species back to life is a poor idea.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays