June Tangney's Essay On Public Shaming

Decent Essays
The author of this essay argues that public shaming can make people regret their actions and even become a good person. Because nobody likes to be publicly humiliated, people who committed a crime would change their bad behavior. However, this idea is not applied on the real world. The majority of criminals find some other people to be blamed for their mistakes. Therefore, making people feel shameful does not solve the issue because the guilty person keeps making excuses to not feel guilty about them breaking the law.
As a further matter, the author claims that bad behaviors are what cause people to commit those crimes, meaning that there are no bad people. In my perspective there are good and bad people and is up to every person to do what is right or wrong, everyone should be judged by their actions and behaviors.
…show more content…
I disagree; people decide whether they do good or bad to others. The author arguments that we should condemn the crime not the person, but that would not work. If you don’t condemn the crime, will the person to be blamed for breaking the law would change his/her attitude? People should be punished so they can be aware of their mistakes or for their wrongdoing to their community, which will make them more aware of their actions when they are placed in the same position as

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In this essay I will discuss two approaches to punishment which are retributivism, also known as non-consequentialism, and utilitarianism, also known as consequentialism. I will then analyse three justifications of punishment within the utilitarian approach which are reform and rehabilitation, individual and general deterrence and incapacitation. Retributivism is a sociological perspective of crime which looks at the different forms and changes in punishment. It is a backward thinking approach as it does not look at future consequences of punishment and is mostly concerned with offences already committed and getting ‘justice’. This approach is considered similar to ‘an eye for an eye’ as it is based on the idea that if we inflict harm on another…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Congress repeal “Mandatory Minimum Law”? My answer to that question is yes, many of my opponent’s arguments for why these laws should not be changed are; This law helps keeps criminals off the street for longer periods of time, thus, causing the crime rate to decrease. Based on that argument I must argue that this not true, statistic that we will get into later have proven that this is not a deterrent to crime. Daily our prison population continues to grow soon, there will not be enough room for prisoners to go.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compare and contrast the criminal careers of occasional and conventional offenders. Should the criminal justice response to these types of offenders vary? Support your answer. Property crimes can be divided into several categories two of which are occasional and conventional crimes. Occasional crimes can include vandalism, shop lifting, auto theft, and writing bad checks (Hagen, 2013).…

    • 2395 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the semester, we have repeatedly discussed statistics regarding current crime and incarceration rates. In comparison to previous rates, from earlier decades, it is clear that society’s viewpoint on crime has changed significantly. Beginning in the early 1970s, the United States initiated a more punitive criminal justice system (1). In The Punishment Imperative, authors Todd R. Clear and Natasha A. Frost created a concept for the reasoning behind this mass incarceration. Referred to as the “Punishment Imperative,” its basis for reasoning focused on the symbolic image that crime held in society; meaning, as crime rates grew, the societal fear for basic safety began to emerge.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Question: why do criminals commit another offense after being punished? Criminal offense is a huge problem in all societies across the globe. Basic psychology suggests that human beings can be influenced by a reward-punishment system to condition their behaviour. Human nature is not so predictable, however.…

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Normal and the Pathological” article Dr. Emile Durkheim explains how crime is inevitable in all types of societies ranging from low class throughout high class “There is no society that is not confronted with the problem of criminality” (Durkheim, 1964). He goes on to explain how crimes in one society may not be crimes in another society because the acts that characterize crime are not the same everywhere. (Durkheim, 1964). There is some indication that crime decreases as we move from lower class to higher class but as Dr. Durkheim explains the movement of criminality is much larger. “From the beginning of the [nineteenth] century, statistics enable us to follow the course of criminality.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hi Rochelle, excellent post this week. I do agree with you and that you made an excellent point on your post. As indicated in the biosocial theory anyone has the potential of being criminal. What we know that there are many factors that lead to criminality, and this true as we have already seen throughout this class. Although the biosocial theory probably has some merit to a certain extent but I don’t believe this concept is true for everyone.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apology Research Paper

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Introduction An apology is arguably the most effective way for a defendant, or other alleged violator of an accepted legal standard, duty or obligation, to demonstrate their assumed responsibility for a wrong committed.’ Whether an apology is heartfelt, or more calculated and pro forma, there is little question that when an apology is delivered, its maker has assumed at least moral responsibility for the act or omission in question.2 Societies tend to respect individuals who “own up” to their faults, admit mistakes, take responsibility for their conduct and offer an appropriate apology to any affected innocent persons.3 Radzik and Murphy explain that apologising is the most likely explicit means through which human errors of any kind are…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With labeling theory it is shown that placing a label such as a criminal on an individual, it will not deter an individual from crime, but make it more likely that the individual will continue or start this behavior and more toward crime. It is discussed that applying a label of a deviant on another makes them more likely to gravitate toward this label and exhibit behavior that goes along with the label. This is a contrast to how the deterrence theory would view criminal punishment. Deterrence theory would see this as a possibility to deter crime as it could use an individual for general deterrence. By labeling the individual as an offender (possible even labeling them as a specific type of offender), the deterrence theory can make an example out of the individual with the type of sanction that is given.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Crime rates and individuals’ risks of victimization vary widely by social context. This social context is a micro-environment that has physical and social dimensions” (Mithe & Meier, 1994.) Which can be related to Emile Durkheim’s social fact and Karl Marx’s social reification. Social facts are anything that originates in a culture or social institution, external to, and coercive of, individual behavior. Social reification is the “thingification” of social relations where they are rendered active, or coercive, and subjects rendered passive.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is clear that in today’s world the consent of crime and deviancy are redefined in our communities. Many types of deviant behavior are normalized; not only citizens but also the authorities are ignoring these things, which can be considered as criminal acts. Daniel Patrick Moynihan showed throughout his paper that redefining deviancy is what is keeping us from being a healthy society. I totally agree with Moynihan’s ideas of redefining deviancy, we are citizens have to pay more attention to what is going on around us. Only on Emile Durkheim’s world crime is beneficial to society.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Victims of public shame, such as Monica Lewinsky, Hester Prynne from The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, and Justine Sacco from “Is the Internet a Mob Without Consequence” are humiliated following the disclosure of their secrets, harassed by critics of the incident, and have spoiled reputations based on one broadcasted mistake, therefore, public shame should be left in the past. Victims of public shame face humiliation following the disclosure of their secrets because their actions are renowned by those who, through the victim’s shaming, have been made aware of a shameful event. Monica Lewinsky, for example, became infamous for her affair with the former President of the United States, Bill Clinton, after its occurrence became known.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fletcher states, “The criminal law should punish only the guilty. If the "guilty" were those who could fairly be morally blamed for wrongdoing, then the principle of punishing the guilty,…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. What is the title of the text and what is the text about? The title of the text I read was Popular Mechanics by Raymond Carver. It is about a conflict between a man and woman who are separating and disagree about who will have their baby.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is said that people with “a positive self-image” and support from various people such as a community, school, friends, and parents can deter from committing a crime and not cross the path into the criminal life. Society has the power to impact one’s life from stopping them from becoming a criminal. The social process approach- an individual’s socialization- determines the likely hood of criminality. By shedding light onto three different theories we can clearly see how much an impact society can have.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays