Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Improved Essays
In William Shakespeare’s tragedy, “Julius Caesar,” Brutus and Antony portrayed two antagonizing reactions after Caesar’s regicide. This scene not only lays the framework for the rest of the play, but also exemplifies the personality traits of Brutus and Antony. Their persuasion throughout their monologues helps to rally the plebeians in support of their causes. In response, this scene marks a turning point in the play and subsequently foreshadows Brutus’ murder. It shows how Brutus’ actions and words eventually lead to his decimation, especially with the help of Antony’s coaxing of the plebeians.
In his eulogy, Brutus attempts to express to the plebeians the necessity of his actions. He tries to justify his crime by pursuing the plebeians that the regicide did not benefit him, but benefits everyone. He uses ethos and logos multiple times throughout his eulogy in order to appeal to the plebeians’ trust and logic. Brutus said, “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves; than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men” (III.ii.22-24). In order to project the assumption that only the worst could come from
…show more content…
He repeatedly refers to Brutus as an honorable man, but the more he speaks the more he says quite the opposite. Antony tries to reveal to the plebeians that if Brutus really lived up to his reputation as an honorable man, he would not have murdered Caesar. He precedes to successfully discredit Brutus, turning the plebeians against him. Antony uses verbal irony again when he says, “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke…” when in fact the purpose of his speech was to in fact disprove Brutus (III.ii.100). He wanted to manipulate the plebeians into seeing that the conspirers’ actions did not aim to benefit Rome, but in fact that they took their actions simply out of fear. By using verbal irony, Antony gainsu their sympathy and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony explains, “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, / Which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?” (III,ii,93-94). The first part of this phrase shows that this is Antony's best evidence to contradict the speech of Brutus, and Antony knows that the majority of his audience will see it as he portrays it. This gives the reader the more crucial side of dramatic irony because the crowd could now be easily persuaded by Antony’s rhetoric.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All the conspirators save only he did that they did in envy of great Caesar” (Shakespeare 78). The love Brutus has his for both Caesar and Rome is evident in his death, which keeps everyone skeptical before because he only uses words to express his emotions. However, Brutus now uses his actions to prove his affection, which everyone sees as valid and true. Consequently, the death of Brutus demonstrates how noble and pure he truly is, but it isn’t seen by the people until his selfish desires erase in his…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Brutus's speech he says, "Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?" (III:ii:22-24) Brutus is hitting their emotions by saying that they would be all slaves if Caesar was still alive and ruling over Rome. This was extremely effective because he knows that none of the commoners would want to live their lives as slaves. Antony says in his speech, "Look, in his place ran Cassius' dagger through.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus’ speech creates an understanding from the plebeians of the moral obligation of Caesar’s death. After hearing Antony’s speech the romans experiences a lot of anger and decide to burn down the houses of all the conspirators and kill them. “We will be revenged” (III.3.198). The anger inside of the plebeians proves to create irrational thoughts which results in them killing an innocent man who just happens to have the same name as one of the conspirators. In addition to that they also go to destroy the conspirators’ houses.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical play, “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare illustrates the problems of leadership that commence after the assassination of the Roman dictator, Julius Caesar. The play has a thorough use of rhetorical devices and was a powerful persuasion tool during the whole of the show. This literary device is extensively used during the funeral scene in Act three, Scene two where Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches about Caesar's death. In their funeral speeches, while Marcus Brutus delivered a logical speech, Mark Antony overall wins the crowd through his use of ethics and empathy. Antony’s speech left such a lasting impact due his skillful use of Pathos.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other powerful words of Antony’s in Scene ii, such as grievous, rage, and mourn contribute to the use of pathos in Act III. Antony strategically uses pathos to light a flame under the people who are very capricious, in hopes that their deep emotions will cause them to act on their feelings. As Mark Antony exhibits his raw emotions, he is able to quickly get the commoners to follow his word. His use of Pathos gives him the ability to explain his feelings while allowing the people to feel like they have been expressed at the same…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Traits

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus has just told the plebeians in his speech that Caesar’s ambition led to his killing and that the people who killed Caesar did it for the good of Rome. Antony, following that restrictions set in place by Brutus, gives examples of Caesar being not ambitious and follows those examples with “But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man.” The plebeians, however, figure out that Caesar was not ambitious, and that the conspirators were wrong in killing him. This was Antony’s original purpose, but he never lets anyone know. In fact, he uses verbal irony and says the exact opposite.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Zakiyah Green Mr. Tucker 10th Grade Honors Lit/Comp 26 Feb. 2018 Act III Scene 2 (brutus funeral speech) This particular scene of the play “ Brutus “ by Julius Caesar took place at the main character “Caesar’s” funeral, where Brutus is trying to explain to the Romans why killing his own best friend out of the love for his country was the right thing to do. Brutus not only believed that what he has done was right for the country but he also had to persuade the Romans that he was only trying to save the country from becoming a complete disaster.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the two characters, Brutus, and Antony, have to go against each other. They each attempt win over the angry plebeians with their speeches at Caesars funeral. Brutus tries to justify the killing of Caesar while Antony disapproves of the killing of Caesar. Antony and Brutus where both wonderful speakers but only one speech won over the people in the end, which was Antony’s speech.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By using flattery, Antony is able to bring the Plebeians to his side through his speeches at Caesar’s funeral. First, “The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious… And Brutus is an honourable man” (III,ii,77-87). Antony constantly gives credit to the conspirators, especially Brutus. He repeatedly shows that the other speakers at Caesar’s funeral were honorable too.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony perfectly tailors all these elements in his speech to achieve the goal of getting the commoners on his side and against…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether public speeches result from those such as Adolf Hitler or Martin Luther King, Jr., their remarkable ability to ignite the population persuades people to take up arms regardless of the cause. In the midst of Act III in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak to the bewildered citizenry regarding Caesar’s demise. Resulting from a handful of conspirators assassinating him in the Senate, Caesar’s death sparks chaos which demands explanation. Thus, some individuals assert Brutus’ speech over Antony’s by claiming that Brutus’ effect and ability to direct his point sooner propel him higher than Antony. Unfortunately, this argument fails to acknowledge Antony’s mightier impact on the audience and his employment of a larger…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which begs two questions did Caesar have too much ambition? Moreover, what was Caesar so ambitious about? In this essay, I am going to talk about Brutus’ funeral speech and whether it was more effective than Antony’s, what rhetorical appeals did both Brutus and Antony use, and if having too much ambition is a bad thing. In my opinion, Brutus had the better funeral speech he was unequivocal on why he killed Caesar and did not try to make friends with the people that did not accept what he did to help Rome.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Julius Caesar, Brutus dives into the pretentious idea that Julius Caesar possesses an excess of negative attributes that hinder justice from occurring - attributes which he decides to reveal at the time of his speech. As an honorable figure in Rome, Brutus makes it specifically clear to everyone that for the good of Rome, Julius Caesar deserves "death for [the] ambition [he displays in the past]" (III.ii.1562). Although Brutus addresses many topics in his speech, the particular reason that he gives for killing Caesar essentially consists of serving justice for Rome, a statement which no one in the crowd dares disagree with. Taking this into account, Brutus 's starting statement of the essentiality of showing utmost loyalty towards a greater party or union instantly receives more support. To achieve even further results, after introducing the wrongs Caesar demonstrates as a leader, Brutus goes beyond accusations by attributing to his personal emotions as one who mourns for a dear friend yet still manages to remain loyal to his country.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony sardonically calls Brutus “honourable” and “noble” after he maliciously participates in the murder of Caesar (III.ii.1621/1627). By sarcastically calling him honourable, Antony clandestinely depreciates the man’s reputation resulting in the crowd realizing that he can not be blindly trusted and they need to consider for themselves what is going on. Thus, Antony begins to steal Roman support away from Brutus and twist it into animosity. Antony states that he is “not” speaking to “disprove what Brutus spoke” although his purpose in his speech is to convert the fickle Romans from being Brutus supporters to Brutus haters (III.ii.1644). This statement rallys even more support from the crowd because it illuminates Antony is only trying to do what is morally correct in this tragic situation which in turn further dwindles the belief that Brutus did the right thing.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays