Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Improved Essays
"The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" is one of many plays written by William Shakespeare, this tragedy is well-known for its nonfictional incorporation relating to, or rather based off of, true events from Roman history. After the Civil war against Pompeii, Julius Caesar returns home and is labeled a hero, causing much excitement and some jealousy to rise within those closest to Caesar; his murder then was planned and executed, forcing Antony to remind the people of Rome who Caesar really was and of everything he did for his country, thus contradicting Brutus' failed attempt to justify his actions in "his" people's eyes. Using rhetoric to appeal to, relate to, and question the people of Rome and to add to not only his own credibility, but to that of the once mighty Caesar's as well, Antony was able to have a better connection with his audience helping him to persuade them to lean in his favor. …show more content…
He uses pathos in such a way that it makes the roman citizens possibly feel guilty for even considering what Brutus had to say as "truth" within his speech of justification. Antony states, "I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him. The evil that men do lives after them; The good is oft interred with their bones; So let it be with Caesar" (act,scene,lines). Ironically enough Antony begins his speech quickly stating how he was not going to spend time praising his fallen friend, giving the reason that the good that Caesar had done would be forgotten seeing as how it would be buried along with Caesar's body, yet Antony later list achievements made possible for the city of Rome because of Caesar. This statement also can tend to make one feel pity towards the dead or even sadness or self-loath at oneself's reaction stated out

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus is a stoic man and he's also Caesar's best friend. Brutus thinks Caesar is ambitious so he slews him for Rome. He approaches the Romans with mob mentality because he doesn't want them to think that he killed Caesar for the throne. He did this because he values reason above emotion although, when he says, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more," Brutus is showing us a comparison between his love of Caesar and his love of Rome by using these opposite words, less and more, What rhetorical appeals does the speaker use? He is using what is called "Antithesis" and "Epimone."…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed, And as he plucked his cursed steel away, Mark how the blood of Caesar followed it” (A3S2, line 188-190). Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, is about a man who going to be crowned king of Rome and who was loved by all. Brutus and Antony were both effective in trying to win the audiences favor however, Antony used more pathos to connect with the audience’s emotions and Brutus used more of a logos appeal. For example, when Antony read from Caesar’s will about where the money for Rome was supposed to get, he said “ But here’s a parchment with the eal of Caesar (A3S2, L140 P125)”. This was an example of logos because he used a document to present his argument.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony begins his speech by addresses his audience. He refers to them as, “Friends,Roman,Countrymen”( 3.2.131), this articulates that he is bringing himself down to the plebeians level so he can make the crowd feel as though he is their friend even though they are separated by status and rank. This line is an example of pathos because the line is based mostly on emotion or the sympathy and emotion in the audience. This is important to know because as his speech progresses he uses a lot of rhetoric, such as pathos and ethos. Going on he says “ I come to bury Caesar not to praise him” (3.2.121), Antony uses rhetoric and genuine reminders to ultimately portray Caesar in such a positive light so that the crowd enrages at the conspirators.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings." (Cassius 1.2.141-142) This is part of a ‘spiel’ that Cassius gives to Brutus in Scene 2 of Act 1, where Cassius is questioning Brutus’ extensive loyalty towards Caesar, shortly after Brutus exclaims that “these applauses are for some new honours that heaped on Caesar” (Brutus 1.2.134-135). At this point, Brutus still fairly unconvinced by Cassius’ arguments: that Caesar is dishonourable, weak, and that Brutus is much well suited and liked to become ruler of Rome. This quote from Cassius (and the corresponding ideology behind it) is employed by Cassius as a clever piece of rhetoric that is aimed to convert Brutus to his ‘side’, convincing him that…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “An enemy can partly ruin a man, but it takes a good-natured injudicious friend to complete the thing and make it perfect.” It takes time to learn to trust someone just to leave it all behind. Julius Caesar had learned to trust Brutus. He was a noble friend to Caesar until he didn’t know if he cared more about Rome or friendship. Cassius decided to “help” Brutus with his decision.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Grecian Appeals in a Roman State When thinking of famous oration, one example comes to the forefront. The speech given by Marc Antony to mourn Caesar in Shakespeare’s work Julius Caesar has been referenced for ages as an example of a convincing argument. Everyone recalls the opening line of, “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears.” and all know what follows the speech – war leading to the establishment of the final triumvirate. (Shakespeare 3.2.82)…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Friends, Romans, Countrymen, Lend me your ears Authors constantly use literary devices in their novels/plays to convey a message or clarify the text. In his historical play ‘Julius Caesar,’ William Shakespeare’s use of literary devices has a significant effect on the developing plot. Moreover, the literary devices add deeper meaning to the text and add life to the overall writing. Mark Antony, one of the main characters’ in ‘Julius Caesar,’ was Caesar’s right hand man and his greatest companion. After the unfortunate event which brought an end to Caesars’ life, Mark Antony gives a sermon at Caesar’s speech to negligibly reveal his intentions of avenging Caesar’s death.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony uses rhetoric when using his poison-like words in favor of himself, and against those who betrayed Caesar. When giving his speech, he begins by announcing “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him./” by starting like this, he grabs the emotional appeal of the audience by showing his gratitude and love for his dead friend (3.2. 83). Antony continues to address the wrong that was done upon Caesar and he finishes a part with “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar,/” showing his remorse, “And I must pause till it come back to me./” Antony begins to weep and pauses for a moment (3.2. 115, 116.) As he pauses in the middle of his words, a plebeian speaks up from the crowd, “Methinks there is much reason in his sayings./” as the citizen says this, it shows the effect that the little amount of Antony’s words have already impacted on the crowd (3.2. 17). Antony continues to lace his words with rhetoric, the naive Romans quickly change both their perspective and opinion about the entire situation abruptly.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, he gives a logical closing statement: “You all did love him once, not without cause:/What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?/O judgement! Thou art fled to brutish beasts” (III.ii.102-104). After Brutus’s sudden claims that Caesar’s murder was justified, the people believe him and even back him for their next leader. Antony inputs that this is illogical. The Roman people appear very impressionable and in shock after their much beloved…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Flaws

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is a tragic story of how one man’s decision destroyed the unity and peace of a great city. In the play, Brutus is concerned about Caesar’s rise to power in Rome. He has to decide between his love for Caesar and his love for the people of Rome. Brutus is a tragic hero who is noble and worthy of admiration, and who falls to his tragic flaw which he discovered just before his death.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During this time Antony is trying to come up with something that will not only discredit Brutus, but also make the citizens band around him. So he goes “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me”. Antony uses this quote to emphasize how much he loved Caesar, and the sadness he feels now that Caesar is gone. It is this grief that makes the citizens of Rome sympathetic to him, thus leading to them to wonder if Caesar death was…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The use of rational speech is more distinctive of a human being than the use of his limbs” (Aristotle, Rhetoric). In Aristotle’s book Rhetoric he elaborates on the three rhetorical devices; ethos, logos, and pathos. These devices are found frequently in Shakespeare’s writings, particularly in Julius Caesar. Rhetorical devices are tools of persuasive writing which influence readers through appeals such as credibility, logic, and emotion. To begin, Ethos is a rhetorical device which appeals to credibility or authority.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marcus Brutus and Marc Anthony both gave superb speeches describing how they feel about Caesar’s death. Both gave good points, were persuasive, specific, and changed the plebeians mind set. First, I will explain Brutus’ speech in simple words. Next, also explain Antony’s in simple words. Then, Compare and contrast these two detailed and complex speeches.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare's play the Tragedy of Julius Caesar, two speeches are given to the people of Rome about Caesar’s death. Brutus and Antony both try to sway the minds of the Romans towards their views. Brutus tried to make the people of Rome believe he killed Caesar for a noble cause. Antony tried to persuade the people that the conspirators committed an act of brutality toward Caesar and were traitors. The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both Antonys and Brutus’s speech to the people are conveyed through the tone and literary and rhetorical devices throughout the speeches.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play written by famed writer William Shakespeare titled "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" is a piece that has profoundly affected literature throughout the ages. Written in the year 1623, this influential story is set within Rome during the year 44 B.C., and features prominent Roman members of society who often die violent and unpredictable deaths. Considered a tragedy, this production features various techniques, including both internal and external conflict, usage of tragic flaws, and plot development, that assist in fully evolving the story and the reader 's interpretation of both the characters and progression of the tale. However, one the major literary techniques that is emphasized throughout the duration of the play is the utilization…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays