Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Improved Essays
In William Shakespeare’s play the Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the play begins with the people of Rome celebrating Julius Caesar’s victory over the deceased Pompey’s sons. Prior to Pompey’s death, Caesar and Pompey shared power over Rome, and now that Pompey has died the people of Rome want Julius Caesar to become emperor. Meanwhile Brutus a powerful man of honor is manipulated into leading the conspiracy to assonate Julius Caesar. After the assassination Brutus the leader agrees to let Caesar’s friend Antony speak at Caesars funeral. Marcos Brutus speaks first and uses a more condescending agreement. Antony’s speech is able to get the crowd on his side by using a more relatable approach. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Antony’s speech is more effective than Brutus’ because he develops his points more by using logos. …show more content…
Antony begins his speech by listing reasons to persuade the crowd that Caesar is not ambitious. Antony “Thrice presented him with a kingly crown. Which he did thrice refused. Was this ambitious”(Shakespeare 97-98). Antony’s declaration exemplifies the opposite of power hungry due to the fact that Caesar denied the position of king 3 times allows for the plebeians to believe that Caesar was in no way ambitious because he rejected a position of great power multiple times. Antony describes Caesar’s lack of ambition by stating that “When the poor have cried. Caesar hath wept: ambition should be made of sterner stuff. Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; and Brutus was an honorable man.” Antony’s depiction of Caesar as being an upstanding man allows for the plebeians to view Caesar as a man of the people which makes the people reason that Brutus told them about. Antony’s repetition of Brutus’ Character makes the audience believe that Brutus was in fact not a principled man like they have been led to believe and now see him as a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus is a stoic man and he's also Caesar's best friend. Brutus thinks Caesar is ambitious so he slews him for Rome. He approaches the Romans with mob mentality because he doesn't want them to think that he killed Caesar for the throne. He did this because he values reason above emotion although, when he says, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more," Brutus is showing us a comparison between his love of Caesar and his love of Rome by using these opposite words, less and more, What rhetorical appeals does the speaker use? He is using what is called "Antithesis" and "Epimone."…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Suggested Score 80% Accept Suggested Score Manual Score: Manual Score Prompt Rubric | Checklist Two Julius Caesar Speeches Brutus and Mark Antony both delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar. How do these speeches relate to the conclusion of the play?…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In his speech, Marc Antony argues that Brutus' statement that Caesar was ambitious is wrong, while Brutus argues that Caesar was ambitious and power-hungry. Marc Antony appeals to the pulpit by using a past occurrence to give them a reason and an example as to why they should believe him. "When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept:/ Ambition should be made of sterner stuff:" (19-20 IIIii). Marc Antony uses this point to get the crowd to understand that Caesar was too emotional and had too big a heart to be considered ambitious. Caesar loved Rome and the people living there so much, that he would have never tried to put any of them in harm's way for the sake of gaining power.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical play, “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare illustrates the problems of leadership that commence after the assassination of the Roman dictator, Julius Caesar. The play has a thorough use of rhetorical devices and was a powerful persuasion tool during the whole of the show. This literary device is extensively used during the funeral scene in Act three, Scene two where Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches about Caesar's death. In their funeral speeches, while Marcus Brutus delivered a logical speech, Mark Antony overall wins the crowd through his use of ethics and empathy. Antony’s speech left such a lasting impact due his skillful use of Pathos.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each included example of logos, ethos, and pathos in his speech. However, one crucial mistake that Brutus made when speaking is letting Antony speak after him. He cannot counter what Antony says, and does not know what he tells the people. Because of the way Antony spoke and what he included in his speech, he is able to come out on top. The people are able to relate to the emotion that is pouring out of Antony, whereas they merely listened to the facts that Brutus spoke to them.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony uses several rhetorical devices when trying to persuade the people of Rome, such as anaphora, logos, pathos, and rhetorical questions. The crowd is impressed when Antony shows them that he has “a parchment with the seal of Caesar”(III.ii.130.). The mob becomes depressed when they hear Caesars will. Antony knew that by showing the will, the people the mob would see him as a hero for reading it as they grieve his death. After reading the two speeches, do you agree with Antony’s statement, “I am no orator as Brutus is,/But (as you know me all) a plain blunt man”?…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him. In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After close examination it is clear to see that Antony's use of Ethos, Pathos, and logos is far more persuasive than Brutus argument. Anthony's words strike the word of Brutos. At the beginning of Brutus's speech, he instantly uses ethos by telling the people to remember his honor, which is effective and catches the audience's attention. He remind the audience of his wisdom so they will more easily believe him.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus recites a speech in the market place after Caesar’s death the speeches exemplify parallelism, verbal irony, and witty use of rhetoric. With the Roman public watching on eager to see a reprisal for the death of Caesar, Brutus uses the undetected technique of coercion on the Romans taking advantage of their easily susceptible minds. In his speech he proclaims his love for Caesar passionately stating “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his”. With the public making up their minds, Brutus plays his pathos card, showing he really did care for Caesar but claims, “Have you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” .Here…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a sarcastic tone, Antony repeatedly referred to these "honourable men". Repeating "Honourable men" is also seen to be ironic, he's ridiculing Brutus and the conspirators saying his idea of Caesar being so ambitious, he's a threat, is something to laugh about. Every time Antony cleverly pauses in his speech to let the plebeians comment, the plebeians are more spiteful toward the conspirators. As the crowd begins to favour Antony the citizens make comments like "Methinks there is much reason in his saying" which shows there change in opinion. Antony said his speech, after Brutus so Antony could adapt to what Brutus has already said and even prove it wrong.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony manipulates the audience by using this deductive reasoning to prove that it is unjust to murder someone who cares so much about them. Antony starts with a universal truth and backs it up with evidence. He is giving the citizens of Rome further knowledge, so they can make their own decision. From this truth, Antony was able to reach the conclusion that Brutus cannot be labeled as a honest man when he said that Caesar was ambitious and Antony had just proved his point wrong. The audience comes to a realization that they cannot trust Brutus.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony has to slowly plant doubt and anxiety that perhaps Brutus was wrong; that although he is a good and honorable man, Brutus could have just murdered another good man, who was only doing good for Rome. Antony uses his words to manipulate the people’s minds much better than Brutus did. The people know that Antony was Caesar’s good friend and the good things he is saying about Caesar are credible. Since Antony is changing the crowd’s perspective about who Caesar was, his continuous good remarks about Brutus keep them from getting angry and…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After Caesar’s death, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the conspirators and Mark Antony speak to the public to explain what has happened to Caesar. Brutus, one of the main conspirators and Caesar’s best friend, talks first and gives the Romans the reason as to why Caesar had to be killed. Brutus’ speech is very convincing and he manipulates the crowd into believing him easily. After Brutus speaks, Mark Antony, Caesar’s good friend and second in command, gives a speech about Caesar and how he did not deserve to die, easily turning the crowd against Brutus and the other conspirators. Both speeches use persuasive techniques, like ethos, and rhetorical devices, like repetition and rhetorical questions, to manipulate their audiences…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays