Julius Caesar Persuasion Analysis

Improved Essays
The Power of Persuasion Taylor Lautner once said, “Honesty and Loyalty are key. If two people can be honest with each other about everything, that’s probably the biggest key to success.” Unlike Brutus, Antony was extremely loyal and honest to Caesar. Both of these men gave a speech at Caesar’s funeral to persuade the crowd. However, Brutus and Antony use different techniques to convince the people to their cause. Antony relies on emotion to successfully persuade the people while Brutus put into action his credibility.
Brutus puts forth his credibility while delivering his speech. When he asks the crowd to believe him for his honor (III, ii, 14-15), he convinces the people to side with him due to the fact that they trust in him. He also uses so called “facts” to further explain why they killed Caesar. When Brutus says he honored Caesar, but he was too ambitious to be King (III, ii, 26-27), the people start to believe this to be true and therefore think that the conspirators were justified in killing Caesar. As soon as the crowd listens to Antony’s version, the people soon change their thoughts and feelings for the conspirators.
…show more content…
He states that Caesar was his faithful and dearest friend to persuade the crowd to have sympathy for him (III, ii, 87). Likewise, when he explains that his heart is with Caesar in the coffin (III, ii, 108), he brings a sense of remorse and sadness for the people to express pity for him. When Antony reads Caesar’s will at the funeral, he explains all the great things that Caesar left for the people of Rome. Antony reads his will so that the crowd starts to feel guilty about Caesar’s death. By doing this, the crowd begins to riot in hatred against the conspirators, which is exactly what Antony intended to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony's use of the three forms of persuasion was more effective than Brutus's. Antony's use of ethos, pathos, and logos is able to convince the people that he is correct. Brutus manages to convince people shortly in his speech that he is right, but in the end Antony wins. In the beginning of Brutus's speech he states "Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor that you may believe. "(III:14-15).…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Brutus is an honorable man.” (Act 3, Scene 2). Mark Antony as well as Brutus both used very convincing techniques to sway in their favor. Mark Antony did have a better way with words, as we would say. He had a more respectable tone as well as diction.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Bernbach once said, “Persuasion is not a science but an art.” In the shakespearian play Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony Speaks to the People of Rome about Caesar’s death. Brutus makes a great speech, but Antony is the one who wins over the crowd. Let’s compare and contrast both sides of the two speeches. The strategy Logos, Ethos, Pathos, and Karos was used in both speeches and each speech used it differently.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus on the other hand, uses only facts which doesn’t give much credibility and there is no bond between him and the crowd. Antony’s precise word choice allows him to even combine pathos and ethos in one phrase. For example, towards the end of the funeral speech, Antony says “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world: now he lies there.” Antony appeals to the empathy of the crowd by making them feel sad about his death, especially when he says “now he lies there”. He also shows Caesar was morally good because Caesar was willing to stand against the world just for…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Tragedy of Julius Caesar: Persuasion There's always two sides of the story when it comes to an argument. Brutus tries to explain to the crowd that Caesar was ambitious and is not fit to rule Rome. Antony tries to turn the crowd Brutus. Brutus and Antony used effective persuasive techniques in their speeches from the Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Brutus used two persuasive techniques that are striking to convince the crowd that Caesar was ambitious.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, at the beginning Brutus was able to sway the Roman people to see his side of the story. He included logos and ethos in his argument to make it more effective in gaining the citizens trust. In some aspects the arguments are similar, but one is more effective that the other. Antony's speech is the greater of the two.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After reading the two speeches I disagree with Antony stating he is “no orator as Brutus is, but a plain blunt man”(III.ii.220). I disagree with Antony portraying himself as a plain blunt man because the way he speaks to the crowd of Rome reveals his manipulative, selfish and conniving ways. He does not want what is best for Rome, but only what is best for…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him. In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After close examination it is clear to see that Antony's use of Ethos, Pathos, and logos is far more persuasive than Brutus argument. Anthony's words strike the word of Brutos. At the beginning of Brutus's speech, he instantly uses ethos by telling the people to remember his honor, which is effective and catches the audience's attention. He remind the audience of his wisdom so they will more easily believe him.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oxford dictionary defines loyalty as “A strong feeling of support or allegiance”. Loyalty is an important quality that can seriously impact one’s decisions. It is very present and plays a big role in the plot of Julius Caesar. It is Brutus’ and Antony 's differing senses of loyalty that drive their actions and words concerning Caesar in William Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar. The character’s loyalties decide how they act towards Caesar before his death.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Knowing he had to sway the crowd to believe his opinion, Antony had to discreetly show the crowd that conspirators were not heroes, but murderers. Using different forms of persuasion, Antony was able to achieve his goal of turing the sympathy to people now had for Brutus, over the Caesar once again. In order to persuade the people to not have sympathy for the Conspirators, Antony showed them Caesar’s will, repetitively said the word “honorable”, and showed them Caesar’s…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony was able to convince the crowd to do what he wanted by conjuring their emotions. He was also able to gain power over the plebeians because they were followers. In addition, Antony’s speech was successful because he made the crowd feel pity as well as guilt for betraying Caesar. Furthermore, it made them feel anger towards the conspirators for killing Caesar and sympathy for Antony because he showed his emotions. Antony’s speech is one for many generations to uses as a model for persuasive speaking, as it uses genuine emotions to persuade the…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Brutus and Antony have a persuasive tone during their speeches as Brutus uses his credibility and some reasoning while Antony uses actual evidence and fiery emotion. Although Brutus has a strong speech and wins the crowd over, Antony is able to win them back through his power using his oratory…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasion is a powerful tool that can either be used for good or bad. Having the ability to persuade any one and everyone is a talent to be afraid of. In Julius Caesar the plot revolves around a conspiracy to assassinate Caesar. One by one people are convinced to join the conspiracy by Cassius the leader of the group. Cassius is the leader of the conspiracy group against Julius Caesar.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays