According to the Hersey and Blanchard Model, leadership is “the process of influencing the activities of an individual or a group in efforts toward goal accomplishment” (Hersey & Blanchard, 86). But what does that really mean? A leader must demonstrate to their followers exactly what to do to achieve their goal. They cannot reach their desired result by bartering, lying or stealing. Good leaders don’t bribe their followers; they inspire others by their own actions. The ones who lead the best support their claims through their actions. Throughout history, it’s proved that those whose actions and verbal commands align have more loyal followers and are remembered best. Leading by example is a reality exemplified several times and in several ways
…show more content…
While many know of his assassination and military campaigns, few know of his dedication to his armies. Unlike emperors before him, Caesar fought in or near the front lines as often as possible. By doing this, he exposed himself to “the glories, the rewards, but the toils, miseries, and, above all, the dangers of soldiering” (Fields 15). Caesar’s willingness to participate in the battle, despite the risks, set an example for his soldiers to fight with all their power. His appearance on the battlefield alone inspired soldiers on numerous occasions, the most famous being the Battle of Sabis. The Nervii launched a surprise attack on the Roman troops and outnumbered them sixty thousand men to forty thousand. Although the Romans fought passably against them, it was undeniable they were losing. This didn’t faze Caesar, as he quickly grabbed his weapons and joined the fight in the front lines. His mere presence inspired soldiers to fight with more zeal and strength. In the end, the Romans defeated the Nervii, a victory obviously due to Caesar’s fantastic leadership (Fields 17). Had Caesar led by command and not by example, he would not be the man history remembers him as …show more content…
His contributions to the Civil Rights Movement surpassed those of any other in both memorability and efficacy. This efficacy was due to his practice of peaceful protest. King and his nonviolent actions caused others to actually listen and participate in his fight for freedom. While his lectures certainly helped, they wouldn’t have drawn attention if his protests were violent. The Montgomery Bus Boycott, where black people refused to ride the bus because of the segregated seating, drew worldwide attention to the racial struggles in the South (MARTIN LUTHER KING). News of the boycott spread so far due to the number of people who participated, and those people participated because of King and his ideals. King’s actions inspired thousands of people and influenced the nation and the
While many know of his assassination and military campaigns, few know of his dedication to his armies. Unlike emperors before him, Caesar fought in or near the front lines as often as possible. By doing this, he exposed himself to “the glories, the rewards, but the toils, miseries, and, above all, the dangers of soldiering” (Fields 15). Caesar’s willingness to participate in the battle, despite the risks, set an example for his soldiers to fight with all their power. His appearance on the battlefield alone inspired soldiers on numerous occasions, the most famous being the Battle of Sabis. The Nervii launched a surprise attack on the Roman troops and outnumbered them sixty thousand men to forty thousand. Although the Romans fought passably against them, it was undeniable they were losing. This didn’t faze Caesar, as he quickly grabbed his weapons and joined the fight in the front lines. His mere presence inspired soldiers to fight with more zeal and strength. In the end, the Romans defeated the Nervii, a victory obviously due to Caesar’s fantastic leadership (Fields 17). Had Caesar led by command and not by example, he would not be the man history remembers him as …show more content…
His contributions to the Civil Rights Movement surpassed those of any other in both memorability and efficacy. This efficacy was due to his practice of peaceful protest. King and his nonviolent actions caused others to actually listen and participate in his fight for freedom. While his lectures certainly helped, they wouldn’t have drawn attention if his protests were violent. The Montgomery Bus Boycott, where black people refused to ride the bus because of the segregated seating, drew worldwide attention to the racial struggles in the South (MARTIN LUTHER KING). News of the boycott spread so far due to the number of people who participated, and those people participated because of King and his ideals. King’s actions inspired thousands of people and influenced the nation and the