Essay On Julius Caesar Gallic Wars

Improved Essays
Any human society or civilization that comes into existence as a result of military victory takes part in exercises and acts that when assessed and looked into by the ethicists of modern times, might be considered genocide in modern definition. However, with this an important question arises, did these civilizations and societies considered these acts of war and genocides as a good things or contradicted to it, like the present time? It is observed that with the passing year, people have become peace-lovers more, rather than having an opinion that war is the solution to every problem. But history says something else. There were more days of war rather than days of peace when one looks into the history, whether it is World War II or the Gallic …show more content…
The writer frequently forgets to mention information, which might be intriguing and interesting for the historians. Hirtius, in his prolongation of the Gallic War, notice unsuccessful Roman activities and merciless executions of vanquished adversaries, data which Caesar repressed in the first seven books. At times, absence of progress was too notable in Rome to be disregarded. Caesar clarifies his mishap at Gergovia by faulting his troopers, who had been too eager to attack first. On different events, an ethnographic diversion conceals things. In 6.9-10, men of Caesar construct over the Rhine an overpass and the person reading the content becomes ready in their mind for the attack of the nation on the east bank. The 11-28 sections of the books are dedicated to the traditions of the people of Germany, and further the reader discovers in 6.29 that the Suebians, enemies of Caesar, had withdrawn, so that the armies might

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    An example is how caesar was offered the crown but turned it down every time. The people of rome see that brutus was wrong and they turn against him.The second mistake he made was when he didn’t kill Antony. This is a mistake because Antony was caesar’s right hand man and would continue where caesar left off. If he would of killed Antony, Antony wouldn’t be able to speak against Brutus, or become the power of rome. If Brutus would of done it none of this would of happened.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brutus’ tragic flaw is his loyalty to Rome, which comes from his lineage in Rome. He is too worried about doing what he thinks is right for Rome and the people of Rome that he becomes blindsided by all of the other things happening. The loyalty Brutus has to Rome leads him to killing Caesar. Caesar is destroying Rome right before his eyes and Brutus cannot just stand back and watch, but he is not quite sure what to do. Since Brutus has these conflicting thoughts, Cassius is able to successfully persuade Brutus into joining the conspirators.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His tragic flaw of poor judgement showed when he was taken advantage of by Antony. Cassius had suggested that Brutus all the conspirators to kill Antony too so that they could prevent any future conflict since Antony had worked for Caesar, but Brutus did not listen and let him live. Wanting to reduce the amount of violence, he ignores Cassius’s advice again and instead allows Antony…

    • 1100 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You know not what you do: do not consent That Antony speak in his funeral: Know you how much the people may be moved By that which he will utter?” (Act III, Scene 1). Cassius can tell that Antony will betray them but Brutus does not believe it. Unlike Cassius who can see the vindictive and selfish intentions of people, Brutus sees the best in everyone less he has solid evidence. Cassius is a foil to Brutus. Both Cassius and Brutus plot to assassinate Caesar but Cassius is more inclined to treachery than Brutus is and thus easily concedes into his evil ambition.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus tells Cassius that he has been debating many things internally and apologizes for appearing distant and rude to his friends. Cassius then tells a story to Brutus that is supposed to attack Caesar’s strength. This story is meant to show Brutus that Caesar is not a strong enough, physically or mentally, to lead Rome. Cassius further develops this point by saying “ ‘Brutus’ will start a spirit as soon as ‘Caesar’ “, meaning that no great difference can be seen between Brutus and Caesar that would make Brutus unqualified to rule. Brutus responds to Cassius’s attack on Caesar by saying he will consider what Cassius has told him but will not do anything at the current time with the…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Portia refuses to follow Brutus’ orders, which shows he does not have any more power than she does. However, Calpurnia and Caesar’s marriage is more of a typical Roman marriage. Again, Calpurnia has a bad dream which drives her to beg Caesar not to go to the capitol that day. Caesar refuses to listen to Calpurnia’s warnings and calls her foolish for even mentioning them. Calpurnia even calls Caesar, “My Lord” (Act I, Scene I).…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first point discussed in Marta Cerezo Moreno’s The Controlling Force of Rome in Coriolanus and Julius Caesar is how Rome does not function as just a location where the play is set, but in fact the framework of the plots would collapse because the plot is directly related to the location. The city of Rome is constantly attacked by the Volscians in Corialanus, defended by the plebeians, praised by its people and feared by its enemies. Rome is symbolic of the characters Corialanus and Julius Caesar. Corialanus was feared by the people that helped kill him at the end of the story and ruin his life when he was alive. He was also praised by the people for his work in protecting Rome.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pompey, Crassus And Caesar

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After his death the triumvirate completely fell apart. As Pompey and Caesar could not get along and Crassus was the only person keeping the association civilised. However, Crassus and Pompey disliked each other due to the events occurring after the slave revolt. “Most of the praise should have gone to the military leadership of Crassus. Pompey, who had recently returned from Spain, attempted to steal most of the credit for the defeat even though his only accomplishment was to round up the stragglers.” (Wasson, 2016).…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Caesar also refused any knowledge of the diadem being placed on his statue and accused the tribunes of putting there only to ridicule him later. Besides the rumors that were spread by the people of Rome, one of Caesar’s flaws was that he did not pay attention to these rumors. His absence in confronting these rumours only damaged his image more. He would not deny any rumors which escalated the rumors and prompted people to add to them (Yavetz, 204). The vicious rumors did nothing but add to the fear and hatred of Caesar for the conspirators.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to, “ what were the Primary reasons for the “fall” of Rome Mini Q it states that Rome fell mostly because of people getting laziness and carless. Military mistakes were the main reason for the fall of Rome. Some reasons to prove that the soldiers were lazy and careless and didn't have enough soldiers in the army. The second reason is that two foreign invaders, invaded . This hurt Rome by letting invaders take over the City of Rome, So as you can see these are primary reasons for the fall of…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays