Julius Caesar Funeral Speech Essay

Improved Essays
Funeral Speech Comparison in Julius Caesar

Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, portrayed the clash of powers that went on between the remaining leaders after the assassination of the dictator, Julius Caesar. The play took a substantial advantage of rhetorical devices and Shakespeare made it palpable that he valued the art of persuasion at an exceptionally high level. Arguably Shakespeare’s best application of rhetoric are the two funeral speeches given by Brutus and Mark Antony in scene II of Act III. Although Brutus did establish how reliable he was to the audience, and displayed his overall goodness before the conspiracy, Antony delivered a more effective speech by manipulating the fact that he had Caesar’s will, presenting his relationship with Caesar, and using a reasonable amount of logical persuasion.
…show more content…
Simply put, logos is an allure to one's logical thoughts. Arguably, logos was the most well employed form of rhetoric by Antony. When Antony remarked, “I thrice presented him a kingly crown(Act III, scene II, 1640),” he was trying to show Caesars goodness and he supported it with a valid reason; Antony established a relationship with the commoners’ love for Caesar, since they wanted Caesar to be king. In contrast, Brutus tried to convince the people that Caesar was too ambitious and needed to die, but he didn’t provide any reasons as to why he had to die. Although Antony made a strong point with the harnessing of logos, that alone wasn’t enough for the people. If Antony hadn’t used this logical persuasion, his speech might not have had such a powerful

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    William Shakespeare is regarded as the greatest writer in the English language. He is well-known for many of his works such as Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, etc. Along with these works is “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, Shakespeare writes two very well known speeches that are delivered by the characters Brutus and Mark Antony during the funeral of Julius Caesar. In speeches, Shakespeare uses ethos, pathos and logos on behalf of Mark Antony and Brutus to persuade the citizens of their own beliefs.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the evaluation there were a few rhetorical devices that were used. Here are a few that were utilized. First is Diction which was skillfully used in this chapter. "Guilt doesn't go anywhere far enough; the appropriate emotion is shame - shame at our own dependency, in this case, on the underpaid labor of others (221)".…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The modern person is being persuaded everyday through commercials, advertisements, and culture. In the play Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, Caesar is murdered by his best friends. After Caesar dies, Brutus and Antony give speeches; Brutus reasoning with the mob for why it was morally right to kill Caesar, and Antony opposing him. Antony was more effective in persuading the mob than Brutus because he used figurative language.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony perfectly tailors all these elements in his speech to achieve the goal of getting the commoners on his side and against…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical play, “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare illustrates the problems of leadership that commence after the assassination of the Roman dictator, Julius Caesar. The play has a thorough use of rhetorical devices and was a powerful persuasion tool during the whole of the show. This literary device is extensively used during the funeral scene in Act three, Scene two where Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches about Caesar's death. In their funeral speeches, while Marcus Brutus delivered a logical speech, Mark Antony overall wins the crowd through his use of ethics and empathy. Antony’s speech left such a lasting impact due his skillful use of Pathos.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric, it’s all around us whether we realize it or not. In Act Three of Julius Caesar, Caesar moves to the capitol after refusing Artemidorus’ letter of warning. Shortly after, the conspirators (people who were planning to kill Caesar) stab him to death. Antony flees the scene but Brutus convinces everybody to let him live. Brutus then explains to the people of Rome the meaning of why they had killed Caesar, but what Brutus, the conspirators, and people of Rome don’t know, is that Antony is pretending to be an ally but in reality, plans on striking back with the help of Octavius Caesar.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are a numerous amount of unforgettable rhetorical speeches throughout time. Brutus and Anthony speak about Caesar’s death in rhetorical monologue in the Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Brutus’s speech initially persuades the Plebeians, but Anthony’s speech appears more attractive; therefore, causing chaos and ultimately causing Civil War throughout the Roman Empire. Brutus demonstrates credibility, emotion, and persuasion in his rhetorical monologue. Brute did a tremendous job of applying credibility in his rhetorical monologue.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although people generally believe they are persuaded by ideas that they have discovered, William Shakespeare’s historic tragedy, Julius Caesar illustrates that an individual’s thoughts are inevitably shaped by external factors. Persuasion and suggestion are rhetorical skills that play central roles in Julius Caesar, but they also demonstrates how individuals bend towards words they want to hear when faced with a difficult situation. The play cautions the dangers and powers of rhetoric as a tool for manipulation and reminds us how easily and completely an audience can be both won and lost in terms of persuasion. In the few early scenes we are able to see Cassius promoting his own views upon Brutus.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Battle of the Speeches According to John Morley, “Three things matter in a speech - who says it, how he says it, and what he says, and of the three, the latter matters the least.” John understancds that how the speaker presents himself and his ideas can change the side of the crowd, more than any word they could have said. When Brutus and Antony give their funeral speeches in Julius Caesar it is a critical moment for each. Both need to sway the crowd to agree with their perspective.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Julius Caesar has died, Stabbed by the conspirators. His body taken to let others mourn. Brutus, one of the conspirators gives a speech to the citizens looking for answers. He then gives way for Antony; someone who supported Caesar, to give a speech to the citizens as well. They have different perspectives and their speeches differ and affect the citizens differently.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony won logos by appealing to the crowd by making them rethink why they were mad at Caesar, and redirecting their anger at Brutus. Mark Antony won over the crowd through his exceptional choice of words usage of verbal irony, pathos, and logos. Even though he had the advantage of speaking after Brutus he knew exactly what to say in order to get the citizens of Rome on his side. All the while Brutus ran away silently admitting…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After Caesar’s death, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the conspirators and Mark Antony speak to the public to explain what has happened to Caesar. Brutus, one of the main conspirators and Caesar’s best friend, talks first and gives the Romans the reason as to why Caesar had to be killed. Brutus’ speech is very convincing and he manipulates the crowd into believing him easily. After Brutus speaks, Mark Antony, Caesar’s good friend and second in command, gives a speech about Caesar and how he did not deserve to die, easily turning the crowd against Brutus and the other conspirators. Both speeches use persuasive techniques, like ethos, and rhetorical devices, like repetition and rhetorical questions, to manipulate their audiences…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays