Julius Caesar And The Fall Of The Roman Republic

Superior Essays
The Roman Republic was built on the traditional policy of compromise, devoted to ensure the welfare of the people. In time, the struggle for authority brought fundamental changes to the traditional sentiments of the Republic. As territory expansions brought great wealth into the country, power hungry senators and government officials harbored political ambitions and competed for power. Political treachery and self-interest within the senate and the assemblies gave way to economic turmoil and social unrest. The fight for control under the existing Republic ultimately demanded a conversion toward Empire, but before the transition could take place Rome would have to go through a series of civil war, mob violence and murder.

At first, Rome
…show more content…
Although he hailed from a noble family, he identified with the populare interests of supporting the plebeian cause. During his rule, he instituted many reforms, for instance, he established new colonies for the poor Romans, reduced the number of slaves and offered citizenship to the people living in the provinces. Among his many achievements, his most noticeable works included the formation of a police force, abolishment of the tax system and the reconstruction of Carthage all of which helped fulfill the long-term populare goals. In 46 B.C, he was granted the honorable tribunician power for life. Without holding the office itself, he was granted the Republican censorship. *With ultimate power and control, he dominated the affairs of the Senate, the plebeian council and the powers of the censors, for instance, all the candidates for election of the legislative assemblies needed his approval, all bills submitted to the assemblies did not pass without his consent. This severely diminished the powers of the assemblies and deprived the senate of its authority. Moreover, to preserve his supreme image, he minimized the powers of the governors and passed a law which limited their term in office. Finally, around 42 to 43 B.C, he passed a new law which allowed him to appoint all the consuls, the tribunes and the magistrates. (make it …show more content…
After assuming his role, Octavian formed an alliance with Marcus Antonius and Marcus Lepidus and this resulted into the Second Triumvirate (43 B.C) After gaining power, the triumvirate pursued Caesar’s assassins into Greece and defeated their forces at the battle of Philippi (42 B.C.E). Unfortunately, the second triumvirate didn’t last for long. Much like the first triumvirate, it collapsed under the struggle of powers. In time, Antonius and Octavian went to war with each other and the battle of Actium broke out (31 B.C.E). Octavian defeated Antonius in the battle and was left as the only ruler of Rome. (This initiated the beginning of the roman empire and marked the demise the Roman republic)/ (With this the Roman Republic came to a final close and the beginning of the Roman Empire was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Caesar reformed the calendar, making it almost the same as today’s other than a few minor differences. The calendar previously was exceedingly inaccurate, to the point where summer harvest festivals were no longer in summer (Suetonius, 40), and Caesar saw the need to fix this. These changes had a positive impact on the Roman population, effectively normalising the year to be more logical. Finally, the most important way in which Caesar had an impact on the Roman population was through his reforms of the governmental and judicial systems. He made the punishment of crime much more severe (Suetonius, 43), and was very strict on the administration of justice, especially so when it came to corruption in the senate. This had a generally positive effect on the Roman population as it reduced crime rates and increased safety. Furthermore, Caesar reformed the government when he came to power after the Civil War, making himself dictator and king in all but name, but at the same time enlarging the senate and making changes to the government (Suetonius, 40). Despite all the reforms and benefits he brought to the people of Rome, he was still unpopular, especially so amongst the senate. However, he undeniably had a positive impact overall on the people of…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A hero often displays a tragic flaw, a characteristic that brings about a downfall. A tragic hero is a person usually of noble birth, who suffers catastrophe. In the play,” The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,” very much like other tragedies, this play had much suspense with the characters especially Brutus, and Cassius.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Julius Caesar was assassinated by political rivals on the steps of the senate in Rome on March 15, 44 BC. Two of those political rivals were a former first commander under Pompey, Gaius Cassius and Marcus Brutus (a trusted friend) both whom Caesar had pardoned. He was stabbed 23 times. The assassins did not realize that Caesar death initiated the end of the Roman Republic. Caesar was exceedingly popular with the middle and lower classes. They became infuriated that the aristocrats had killed their champion. Caesar had pushed the limits of being a consul and leader until it became something different. By the time he got killed, the Roman Republic was changed. This happened through Caesar's politics, his military expertise, and the changes he…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Augustus took control and united the Roman Republic by defeating the last opposing power, Marc…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The adoption of the heir of Caesar, Octavian, to the high post of Augustus brought the real end of the Republic. This was all occurring during the time of the will for the republic system almost died.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To the people of Rome, Caesar was a great hero. He brought immense power, wealthiness and prestigiousness to Rome and the common people of the time idolised him for it. To them, Caesar truly was considered to be amongst the gods. Various games and activities were held during the funeral in celebration of the life of Julius Caesar in July of 44 BC. In January of 42 BC, Octavian was named Divus Julius (Divine Julius) by the recently reformed Senate, confirming him officially as a god of the Roman Empire, just the same as his adoptive father, and marking the beginning of the practice of a new imperial cult. Though Caesar 's legacy was undeniable, his time had passed, making room for the newest generation of Roman political players, most notably Marcus Antonius and Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus, who would move on to form the Second Triumitive along with Marcus Aemilius Lepidus. Marcus had previously been a great supporter of Caesar, but it’s also debated whether he possibly sought to gain more power for himself with the fall of the Roman Republic, and the consequent rise of the Roman Empire, which continued to reign for another 500 years before the final fall of…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sulla’s march on Rome exposed the weaknesses of the republic and after his dictatorship many political leaders tried to restore the constitution to its formal glory. However, it was only a matter of time before the tensions between political leaders broke this socio political balance. Many people attribute this break to the death of Crassus and Pompey’s wife even though the continued friendship of Caesar and Pompey indicates otherwise, instead, the collapse is more attributed to both the senate’s intervention and triumvirs ever-growing ambition. Furthermore, Pompey and Caesar remained friends in the 50s BC, however, Pompey was stressed by the senate to make a choice between Caesar and the Optimates, through arrogance, Pompey chose the Optimates…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The start of the fall began around after Sulla retired in 81 BC, Crassus and Pompey both fought for the consulship. Pompey then proceeded to make a name for himself in fighting…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of the Roman Republics major downfalls was not only outside conflicts but internal civil wars right inside its own system. The question being researched is “how did civil wars play a role in the fall of the roman republic?” The civil wars are extremely relevant because it shows how outside forces weren’t just a factor into a civilizations downfall but its own wars between its own armies. The issues being addressed are Rome’s political structure, military, economic structure and the outside tensions causing stress to its leaders.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was in control of many regions and not all of these inhabitants were delighted with the current circumstances, especially the citizens in Rome. During the period of the expansion of Rome, the government was becoming less democratic and started displaying signs of an oligarchy. The Senate of the Roman Republic was the prime branch of government. This was comprised of leaders from the patricians, the noble, and wealthy families of ancient Rome. Members of the senate were not elected but were chosen by the Consuls.2 The senate’s main task was to direct spending and verdicts associating with foreign powers. Money in this period meant everything. It characterized your status and ranked your authoritative control. During this time, the Senate was supposed to represent the issues and concerns of the general population of Rome. However, the Roman Senate settled on specific matters without alluding to the assembly of the people. As a result, commanders of the military were given expanded term lengths and power.3 All the power that was supposed to be given to the people, as it rightfully is in a true democracy, was now given to the wealthy and well-known nobles. This resulted in the Roman Republic no longer standing as a democratic…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rome gained its independence from Etruscan rule, and was established as a republic (state without a monarch), in 509 BCE. The republic lasted until the rule of the first emperor Augustus (31 BCE – 14 CE). The empire lasted until 476 B.C.E, but the eastern part of the empire lasted until 1452 C.E. When Rome was under the republican form of government it was not considered a democracy, nor was it ruled by a monarch. Rome was ruled by a senate composed of patricians, who passed their positions down to their sons. The commoners, or plebeians, made up 90% of the population. An elected general assembly represented the views of the plebeians, but the general assembly had little power. The plebeians protested their lack of control in the government,…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are some Roman emperors that are very well known. For example, Julius Caesar has had everything from plays to movies to novels written about him. But there are other emperors who, while their name may have been heard in passing, aren't usually expanded on with quite as much detail. Caligula is one of these emperors. The thing most associated him has been his extreme fall from grace. When he became emperor, the people of Rome believed in him, and were ready for a qualified leader. After only five years, they became disenfranchised and it led to his eventual murder.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The early republic’s social division, which used to determine the shape of politic, and the great power of the senate has led to the demise of the Roman Republic. The people of the Roman Republic were divided according to the social status, most of the political power was in the hand of the Patricians, who were the members of certain elite families. The divided social status has given the most of power directly to the patrician men, who had dominated the Roman republic on both political and legal aspects. The most important institution of the republic was the senate, whose overwhelming power was a threat to the whole republic; they had a direct power over the military, expenditure, affairs of state, and all other aspects. The inequality…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A number of reasons contributed to the cause of the fall of the Roman Republic. One of the reasons were economic struggles. Rome suffered a severe financial crisis through constant wars and the misuse of money from the government. The overbearing taxation and increase had expanded the gap between the wealthy and poor people. In efforts of avoiding the tax officials, the wealthy people abandoned their homes and fled to the countryside and set up self-regulating organizations. The invasions from Barbarians such as Vandals, Angles, Visigoths, and many more went through the Roman Empire destroying it and reached parts of Rome that were unprotected which contributed to the chain of attacks that took place. It is believed that the division between…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throuhout his dictatorship Sulles was able to successfully restore the senate, reduced the power of the assembly, take control of the magistrates by weakening their command, reshaped the entire judicial system to provide a trial for each criminal case. However, when he died the vicious cycle started all over again; with the senate taking back the power and continuing the corruption and further erasing the republic. Many more attempts to rule Rome ensued, war broke out and power was battled between the forever famous Cato, Cicero, and Julius Caesar. (Morey, 1901). The cycle spun and following each fallout Rome remained to regroup.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays