Analysis Of Judith Thomson's Arguments Against Abortion

Improved Essays
Judith Thomson created a very strong, concise argument in defending abortion, in which she believes that it is not morally plausible to deny a mother complete rights and jurisdiction over her own body when impregnated. Ultimately, I believe the person carrying the fetus has the right to decide whether to abort or not, which defends Thomson’s argument. Thomson discusses certain thought-experiments which are hypothetical situations that I believe help prove the point that abortion is necessary in many situations. Without the option of abortion, women will be forced to have children that they are unprepared for, leading to more neglected children. Also, not to mention the fact that in many cases, pregnancy leads to medical complications that can only be solved through abortion or else the mother will die. It’s situations like this that make it hard to believe some people would be against abortion. The first thought-experiment as explained …show more content…
For instance, buying a mesh screen would keep out the people-seeds, but what if the screen is defective and lets one in by accident? It is in no way the homeowners fault that the manufacturers made a mistake in producing the defective product. This can be directly related to the use of condoms, and how if they are defective, a woman can be impregnated very easily and would be left to deal with the consequences. An exterminator would not deny a person their services to remove the rooted people-seeds in a person’s home just because they had a defective mesh screen. If this is the case, then why should a woman be deprived of a solution to a problem that she could not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    And she also says that in extreme cases where the life of the mother is at stake and the pregnancy is due to rape then we cannot come to the conclusion that the morality of abortion depends on moral status of the fetus. This is because regardless of a fetus assumed to have moral status, it does not enforce that the woman is morally obliged to allow the fetus to use her body for 9 months. (Thomson, 54-57) To expand further, Thomson says an abortion is moral when the woman has not assumed a “special responsibility” for the fetus such as allowing the pregnancy to last longer than the normal time to abort. She believes that choosing one’s body over the fetus who is innocent with a right to life is not morally wrong as long as the killing is not done unjustly.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Pro-choice, pro-life, but back before this there wasn't a choice for abortion at, unless the mother was endangered by the pregnancy. The laws were strict, especially in Texas where our famous “Jane Roe” (which is not her real name), a single woman with a fetus inside her, not an actual child or human, because a fetus cannot live on it's on. The debate is that life begins at the moment of conception, at least in Texas and most places at this time, but scientifically it takes until the end of the 1 trimester to find out the sex of the fetus, but it takes the fetus until the 3rd trimester to be fully formed, besides the growth and then finally there will be a baby. This argument can be seen both ways, but recently it has been extremely…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many say that the baby has rights in addition to the mother; Thomson would say then a mother can remove a baby if they are unwelcomed and attempted to be prevented. While this is a very prominent topic of argumentation, it is controversial, and can even be hard to prove and explain a particular stance. Jarvis Thomson is one of the few who tries to make a case. Jarvis Thomson believes that abortion can be acceptable, but only under certain circumstances. She claims in that “Abortion is permissible when it’s to save the other’s life since it’s self defense.”…

    • 1769 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All Persons Have a Right to Life The idea of abortion is always a tough subject to talk about. Some people believe it is morally right to have an abortion but some people like Judith Jarvis Thomson think it is wrong to have an abortion. Thompson does just argue that abortion is wrong, she claims that abortion can be justifiable. Judith is right in her belief that abortion is wrong because the fetus is an innocent person and killing an innocent person is always wrong.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    George believes that abortion should not be legalized. That it should be restricted. He states “A pro-life advocate sees abortion as a sin against God who infuses life at the moment of conception; a pro-choice advocate sees abortion as a decision to be made in accordance with the best scientific opinion as to when the beginning of life, as we know it, occurs.” (182) I believe that in the bible it does state that abortion is wrong, so Mr. George made a good point there.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy is the application of ethical approaches to issues, controversies, theories, and ideas. It is in one’s nature to seek answers to questions which are asked. It is also in one’s nature to question and decide if an idea or ideal is right or wrong, but in the case of ethics; permissible or impermissible. In this text, we are going to use these terms as acceptable or permitted and vice-versa. In this essay, we will be analyzing the article, “A Defense of Abortion” by philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thompson.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro-Life Vs Pro Life

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The social commentary on women’s reproductive health is full of contradictions. As our readings point out, even using pro-life vs. pro-choice rhetoric doesn’t really allow women their inherent rights to their bodies (RWL 53). Contradictions are present when pro-life advocates are in favor of the death penalty and not in favor abortion even when the mother’s life is at risk, implying one life more valuable than the other. Though many feel pro-life advocates are determining whose life is more valuable, it’s important to remember that they believe they are protecting the most innocent form of life. Pro-life advocates often feel like they are giving a voice to human beings that will never have the chance to defend themselves, never did anything…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the semester finally comes to an end and I have time to truly reflect on what I have learned so far I find that my stance on abortion has actually become a bit more muddled. I do not view this as a negative simply because it has allowed me to better understand not only both sides to the argument, but question if I am making the morally correct decision and not just the emotional one. My biggest take away would most definitely be the ability to compare and contrast multiple viewpoints in the argument for abortion. I never considered the fact that the status of the fetus could in fact be irrelevant to morality up until this semester. This Ethics course is something everyone should be required to take in higher education, as it forces people…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Thomson’s Defense of Abortion there are some premises that are false in his argument. Thomson gives multiple arguments on why he believes abortion is permissible and though I agree with him his arguments tend to be focused on the extreme. In one of his argument, Thomson’s mention a mother having an abortion to save her life is seen as murder but he concludes that is false because if not the mother dies. Though I would agree with Thomson’s a person has a choice when it comes to an abortion, his analogy is a stretch. What would happen if the mother was not dying and just proceeded to have an abortion because she wanted to or if having a child actually saved the mother?…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomson and Hursthouse both have come to the conclusion that abortion is impermissible but there are acceptable situations in which abortion should be permitted. In my opinion I agree with both Thomson and Hursthouse but in the end the conclusion of Hursthouse is the view I could see making both sides of abortion acceptable. When a woman and man conceive a baby knowingly, getting an abortion will only occur in the event of a health risk or the chances of the baby living after birth will be so minimum. By choosing abortion before letting the child get to full term is less painful than carrying the baby to full term and giving themselves false hope. It is understandable that some may want to fight for that chance but there is the option of abortion.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The unwelcomed fetus has invaded the woman’s body and is “stealing” in a sense that it is taking nutrients from your body without consent (195). With this, it should not be declared morally wrong to have an…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With this given, I would strongly support a woman’s right to do an abortion under certain circumstance of rape or unplanned pregnancy. Although it is mentioned that, “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life.” (Thomson, J.), it cannot be morally wrong to commit murder towards the fetus if the mother is doing an act of self defense in this case to save her own life. Thomson states that a fetus has a right to life at the moment of conception (Thomson, J.) but thoroughly explains how the fetus cannot overweigh the pregnant woman’s right of life so therefore, it does not begin at the moment of…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are so many circumstantial situations, which should be acknowledged while making the choice whether one should proceed with terminating a pregnancy. Although it’s easy to make an opinion on how morally and ethically disgusting it is to murder just a child, there will never be proof that the fetus instead a woman’s body is a living being. Instead of judging these women for their choices, one should put themselves in their shoes and see just how much of an impact the choice of abortion or no abortion can make. All women deserve a second chance. It should be permitted to allow women to decide for themselves based on the impacts on themselves, their family and their unborn child, whether or not an abortion would be the best…

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays