Judicial Review Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
Judicial Review (Marbury V Madison) Judicial review is the ability for the Supreme Court to deem state laws, federal laws, and presidential actions unconstitutional. This was not a power that was given to the Supreme Court by the constitution, but was instead granted following the 1803 court decision on Marbury v. Madison. This case came to be due to issues with the judiciary act of 1789 and the impact it had on the court system. Following this decision, the Supreme Court has the power to review any bill passed in the United States, and if seen as fit, then the Supreme Court can override the bill. This power has been used varied amounts over time, and has been used in cases of varying importance. Judicial review has been used in differing amounts since it has become part of the …show more content…
Some may argue that the use of judicial review is an overreach of original judiciary power. On the other hand, many others would contend that judicial review provides a huge check on the power of the other branches, and can prevent questionable laws from being passed. Judicial review should be noted as groundbreaking because of how it compares to the powers of other country’s top courts at the time. Judicial review is a vital component in the American system of government, and its impact is extremely far reaching. By allowing the judicial branch to directly check the legislative and executive branches, the setup of checks and balances is wholly complete. Judicial review has become one of the most important powers that the Supreme Court possesses. The Supreme Court has the biggest impact on the interpretation and protection of the constitution, so it makes sense that they can strike down laws that are unconstitutional. Judicial review has several pros and cons, but it is truly one of the key components of the American system and it helps form the system of checks and balances we know

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq Answers

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. In revolutionary America, five groups of people, which was the New England merchant, the southern planters, the royalists, labors, and small farmer were important because they led independent from Great Britain because of conflict with taxation, trade, and commerce. 2. Samuel Adams and some people who disguised as “Mohawk” led Boston Tea Party because colonial merchants feared that the monopoly would hurt their business.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In establishing judicial review, a system of checks and balancing was established. Each layer of government has equal power. The executive, judicial, and legislative branches are all equal. (PBS) In this review they were able to question the constitutionality of decisions made by the executive and legislative branches.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His ruling established the right of judicial review and drastically redefined the notion of separation of powers along with opening the door for the expansion of judicial authority. The establishment of judicial review granted the judges power above that of the legislature. In this case, Marshall used judicial review to rule that Article 13 must be void because it directly contradicted the…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What we call judicial review today came about in the case Marbury v. Madison (1803), when Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall assumed that power from the legislator. Marbury v Madison made it clear that the Supreme Court had claimed Judicial Supremacy in deciding unconstitutionality. In the book, Taking Away the Constitution From the Courts, author Mark Tushnet argues, “Doing away with judicial review would have one clear effect: It would return all constitutional decision-making to the people acting politically. It would make populist constitutional law the only constitutional law there is” (154).…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    7. Why is the Court’s absence of judicial enforcement important? The absence of enforcement authority has allowed Congress and the president at times to ignore Supreme Court rulings. Congress and presidents have good reasons for favoring this approach that allows Congress to delegate lawmaking discretion to the executive branch without surrendering ultimate control.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Supreme Court established its power of judicial review over the other branches of the federal government in one of the most famous cases in our history. This case, Marbury v. Madison, was decided in 1803. The Constitution clearly limits the cases that can go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court without being first heard in a lower court. Marbury's case did not fit within these limits. Congress had changed the Constitution when it passed that part of the Judiciary Act.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Terms: Patronage – the ability to give an office or position to another; many Jeffersonian wanted positions to be transferred to them from the previous president’s cabinet, which Jefferson refused to do, despite differences in political party judicial review – established by Marshall in Marbury v. Madison, it is the belief that the Supreme Court has the right to judge the constitutionality of a situation, not any other branch. Impressment – the forceful enlistment of a person for service as a sailor; the British captured and impressed many American sailors to serve the king, where many died, leaving their families behind unwillingly economic coercion – to convince a nation to do something as a result to changing financial conditions; America…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Fourth Amendment History

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While it is powerful it is not absolute for it is limited by the other two branches making the checks and balances in our government take place. Judicial Review includes the ability for the court to review laws or an official act of an agent of the government. Terry v. Ohio (Know My Rights). A police officer suspected that three men were about to rob a store and confronted them.…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Eleventh Amendment

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Judiciary Can’t Have Too Much Power The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution, changed a portion of Article III, Section II of the U.S. Constitution. Even before ratification of the Constitution anti-federalists worried that Article III, Section II would interfere with the sovereignty of the individual states. The original Article stated that: the judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in law and equity, arising under this constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made under their authority; to cases between a State and Citizens of another State and between a State or the Citizens of it and foreign States. The anti-federalist believed this would allow the federal government to override the States right to not be subject to a suit without the States consent.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Executive Branch contains the President and his Cabinet. The President acts as Head of State, which is the Chief Representative of the United States. The Cabinet is appointed by the President and carries out the duties of the Executive office under the authority of the President. There are multiple government agency’s that the president appoints the heads of, including the CIA, EPA and many more, the President also appoints the head of over 50 independent government agencies.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This means that they can declare federal laws unconstitutional, overrule themselves in previous decisions, and shape public policy. However, there is disagreement over this policy making power which is prominently demonstrated in the debate over judicial activism versus judicial restraint in court…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, the judicial branch also reviews lower court decisions to also ensure they are meeting the intent of the Constitution (Kelly, 2015). Since the inception of the Constitution, there have been few instances where the system of separation of powers has been in question. The separation of powers allows each branch to work interdepended but also have overlapping powers between the other branches. These overlapping of powers allow the checks and balances to occur, so no one branch holds all the power and everything the country does is within the bounds of the U.S. Constitution.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nicolas Winters Group #5 Paper 2 What powers do the Constitution give the Judicial Branch? A world without the Judicial Branch of government is a world without set rules. In 1787, the Constitution had created the Judicial Branch, under Article 2 Section 2, to deal with all of the new laws that could be set in place. The Judicial Branch also leads the Supreme Court, the highest court of law in the United States. The Judicial Branch of government receives powers backed up by the U.S. Constitution, has a very strict and complex system to become a supreme court judge, and the U.S. Supreme Court Justices should interpret the Constitution by how it was originally wrote.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays