She writes in third person omniscient, with a basic chronological sequence of events. The point of view is important to truly get to know each of the main characters. To have only heard the story from Casilda’s point of view would have changed the whole impact of the story; the audience would have only seen the view of a woman who had to take some serious risks in order to protect her family on two separate occasions. To tell the story from Vidal’s eyes may have made for a more adventurous tale, but would require too much development, and would have left out the crucial decisions faced by Casilda. To have written “The Judge’s Wife” in a different style wouldn’t have altered any meaning, but the author correctly chose the sequence which allowed the story simply to be told, and to let the theme and irony be effectively
She writes in third person omniscient, with a basic chronological sequence of events. The point of view is important to truly get to know each of the main characters. To have only heard the story from Casilda’s point of view would have changed the whole impact of the story; the audience would have only seen the view of a woman who had to take some serious risks in order to protect her family on two separate occasions. To tell the story from Vidal’s eyes may have made for a more adventurous tale, but would require too much development, and would have left out the crucial decisions faced by Casilda. To have written “The Judge’s Wife” in a different style wouldn’t have altered any meaning, but the author correctly chose the sequence which allowed the story simply to be told, and to let the theme and irony be effectively