Judge Lukemire Case

Decent Essays
Show More
b. I believe Judge Lukemire also takes responsibility for enabling the actions of Mr. Camp. Under the full view of Judge Lukemire, Mr. Camp denied me representation of the preferred lawyers in the Warner-Robbins area. Mr. Camp did this by arranging for Ms. Jones to consult with a variety of what he evidently considered the best lawyers in the Warner Robbins area. The ex-wife had these consults after the summons had already been issued to me for the August 2011 hearing and after Ms. Jones had already retained Mr. Camp. When I sought these lawyers to represent me Mr. Camp would send a letter to Judge Lukemire claiming a conflict of interest and then the lawyer would decline to represent me. Although I’m not sure how many lawyers in total were

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Yoely Brach Case Summary
    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yoely Brach Case Summary

    Honorable Judge Schmidt: We are confused and baffled by Isaac Oberlander’s demands and ultimatums. Firstly, let us set the record straight: Yoely Brach (“Yoely”) is the defendant and should not dictate the terms of any arbitration proceedings. The fact remains that Mr. Jacob Guttman, the owner of Court Street Office Supplies, Inc. (“Company”), employed Yoely – right out of Kollel with no formal or general education – out of kindheartedness and compassion to his son-in-law. As Yoely mistook his father-in-law’s unselfishness for weakness, he engaged in erratic behavior, breached his fiduciary duties to the Company, and embezzled the Company by hundreds of thousands of dollars.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    People V Lardie Case Summary
    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    People V Lardie Case Summary

    Summary: Jim, who lives in Detroit Michigan, had a few drinks at a local bar but was not intoxicated. Before he left he asked the bartender for a drink of water, who in error gave him a 6oz cup of 40% Vodka. Jim drank it quickly noticing the strength of the liquid but figured it was his imagination as he had requested water. The Vodka went straight to his head and he became intoxicated, causing him to lose control of his car which jumped a curb and killed two people. Jim was arrested and put on trial under Michigan’s “causing death while operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated” statute which carries a 15 year prison sentence.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Appellant V Luis Ortiz
    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Appellant V Luis Ortiz

    requirements of Miranda or whether the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his rights”. (wicourts.gov) STATE of Iowa, Appellant, v. Luis Fernando ORTIZ, Appellee, This case was filed in the Supreme Court of Iowa and was decided in 2009. On July 15, 2006, a woman called the Sioux City Police Department to report that Luis Ortiz, who she hired to do remodeling work in her house, “had forced her seven-year-old daughter to touch his penis”. After a brief meeting with Ortiz Detective Bertrand asked ortiz is he was willing to go to the police station with him for an interview. Once both arrived to the police station Detective Bertrand and Salvador Sanchez, a Sioux City officer, acting as translator, handed Ortiz a Voluntary Waiver of Rights…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Daniel Holtzclaw Court Case Study
    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Daniel Holtzclaw Court Case Study

    Daniel Holtzclaw's court case has been going on for weeks and today they finally came to a verdict. This ex-Oklahoma City police officer was charged with 36 various counts including sexual battery, stalking and more. After 45 hours, the jury finally came to a decision on December 10 and Holtzclaw was found guilty on 18 of the 36 counts. This jury obviously took their time making up their mind. Once they started trying to decide, they were not allowed to go home and took breaks only when it got really late at night, but then started over again in the morning.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Gallaudet University Court Case Summary
    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gallaudet University Court Case Summary

    Student protestors of Gallaudet University presented the Gallaudet University Board of Trustees with four demands: 1. The resignation of the newly appointed university president Elizabeth Zinser, a hearing person, and the selection of a Deaf person as the universities president. 2. The immediate resignation of Jane Basset Spilman, who was chair of the Board of Trustees. 3.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Simon Mulinge's Justice Case
    • 195 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Simon Mulinge's Justice Case

    One man from Machakos town is asking for justice after he was allegedly bitten by a dog belonging to officers from inspectorate wing in the county of Machakos. The victim Simon Mulinge said that he was heading to his home in Eastleigh on 20 october at around 11pm, when reaching Kathembo area an officer from the inspectorate that patrols in Machakos town released the dog that pounced on him biting him leaving him with serious injuries. Mulinge said that the officers took him to Machakos level five hospital where they left him where he complained that his case has never began even after reporting to the police after the incident. Speaking to the deputy commander of the inspectorate officers in Machakos county on the matter said that the victim…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Two Justices Jurisprudence
    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two Justices Jurisprudence

    I believe that these two justices’ jurisprudence, or philosophy of law, is shaped by their political ideologies. This is not to say, however, that I believe that the two justices’ political ideologies affect their ability to come to objective decisions since ultimately, their most important task is to remain impartial. The two SCOTUS justices are on the opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. In addition to their opposite ideologies, the pair has two completely different philosophies of law and therefore, vary in their methods of interpretation. Justice Breyer’s political alignment is more towards the liberal side of the court.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Kentucky Court Case
    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kentucky Court Case

    Background: In Lexington, KY, police were conducting an undercover operation to catch someone selling crack cocaine. The seller was being sold out by an undercover informant. When the suspect fled the scene after catching a glimpse of the cops he ran around a corner and into an apartment building causing the cops to lose sight of him. The cops knocked on the door of one apartment and heard people moving around and entered the apartment because the smell of marijuana came through the door.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case
    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case

    In the founding of America, the founding fathers formed much of the structure that America is based on today. In the world today we still follow the same Federal System that the Americans did in the 1800’s. There have been many Supreme Court cases that have left an impact on our country, but none have left the impact that the Dred Scott versus Sanford decision left. In order to understand the Dred Scott versus Sanford case one must know: the function of the Supreme Courts , who Dred Scott was, and the impact that the case left on future presidents choosing their Supreme Court Justices. The Supreme Court was founded in 1789 because of the Judiciary Act of 1789.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Hurst Court Case
    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hurst Court Case

    The right of due process is one of the most characterizing features that embody the spirit of American liberty. Can anyone imagine a world without constitutional protections, provided for the accused, against arbitrary accusations? Before the establishment of the United States’ Constitution, the founding fathers of America understood that rights inherently bestowed unto the people are rights that should be protected by government institutions. The right against cruel and unusual punishment and the right to a trial by jury are just two of the several protections offered to Americans by the Constitution. In the case Hurst v. State of Florida, Timothy Hurst was charged, convicted, and sentenced to death for the murder of Cynthia Harrison at the…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Atticus Finch Case Analysis
    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Atticus Finch Case Analysis

    While my client provides for his children and teaches them good lessons, he has done a poor job instilling proper behavior in his children, and custody should be given to the plaintiff. Atticus’ absentee nature has done the most damage to Scout, who constantly runs around fighting and cursing. At school, she…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Savitri Bhama
    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Savitri Bhama

    The Plaintiff, Savitri, filed a complaint that Rajendra negligently and intentionally inflicted emotional distress. She alleged that he used his psychiatric training in order to manipulate and brainwash the children into hating her. The defendant then made a motion for summary disposition, which the court granted. The court found the claim to be barred by res judicata. The plaintiff then claimed that by the court granting a summary of disposition was wrong, because her claim was based on relief and was not adjudicated by a court.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Marshall Court Case Study
    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marshall Court Case Study

    From 1801 to 1835, the Marshall Court consisted of six to seven Associate Supreme Court Justices and Chief Justice John Marshall. He was part of the “Midnight Judges” appointed by John Adams on the last day of his presidency, in an attempt for the Federalists to dominate the judicial branch. Marshall was one of the last remaining Federalists involved with the government and his influence on certain cases lasted much longer than the Federalist Party itself. The Marshall Court increased the power of the federal government in terms of the meaning of a contract, the power of the federal government versus the power of the state government, and the regulation of interstate commerce. This became apparent in the Supreme Court’s rulings on Dartmouth…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Observation Report
    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Supreme Court Observation Report

    There was six attorneys in total. Three from defendant side and three for the…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Katzenbach V Grant Case Study
    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Katzenbach V Grant Case Study

    Issues: 1. Does the court have jurisdiction over the Defendant? 2. Should Grant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings