Judge Herscovitz Case Analysis

Decent Essays
Judge Herscovitz was in the process of finishing up arraignments. His last one was a person who violated his probation. The defense counsel explained that he couldn’t check in with his probation officer lately because of life circumstances. The defendants girlfriend is pregnant and the mother has cancer. Judge Herscovitz asked him to not violate it again because then, he would get 45 days in county jail for sure. Judge Ewell, was in the middle of a side bar when I walked in. The first hearing I observed was a defendant who stated he’s completed all but 4 domestic violence courses. His excuse was that he lost his job and has kids. As a result, he got 6 days in county jail. The majority of the remaining hearings were DUI’s. Most of the DUI cases had to the same pleads and the same consequences. I think there were more than 5 DUI hearings and some no shows. There was a DUI case were I got to hear the attorney and his client talking about it once it was done. The attorney was telling his client that it was a good thing he plead no contest because it fell under misdemeanor, even though, there …show more content…
The trail was still in jury selection specifically, in the stage of listening to hardships. Most of the hardships started of with finances. For vacation excuses and the upcoming Jewish holidays, Judge Dohi would ask them to reschedule. There was approximately 20 people explaining hardships. Judge Dohi would ask some people to call in and check with certain people depending on the situation. Friday jurors are always known as the worst. I think since the case was expected to be two weeks long people just had less availability for it. All the remaining jurors came in. The jurors were asked to respond to basic questions on the board. Surprisingly there was a good amount. I feel like Judge Dohi was the right amount of lenient during the hardships. There were a few jurors who seemed like they were lying but who

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Inmate Dalerio Case

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On Friday, January 12, 2018 at approximately 1505 hours I was assisting in Department 11 of the Fresno County Superior Courthouse located 1100 Van Ness Blvd, Fresno, CA 93721. Inmate Dalerio (JID#7051330) started to talk back to Judge H. Chittick. Inmate Dalerio said to judge H. Chittick, “You are shady” and “you do not have any power.” There were another eight other inmates in the jury box and the gallery was full of spectators. The judge let inmate Dalerio say her statements and at this point she was walking out the jury box.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the 17th of December 1986, Olaf Dietrich arrived in Melbourne from a flight from Thailand and was charged the next day with four counts of drug trafficking. He was alleged to have swallowed 70 grams of heroin in small packets in attempt to smuggle them through customs. Olaf Dietrich was found, in his first trial, guilty by a jury of importing no less than a trafficable amount of heroin as pursuant to section 233B of the Customs Act of 1901. Dietrich at first alleged that the drugs had been planted by the police. He was found guilty of two other counts and sentenced in the Victorian County Court.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Daniel Holtzclaw's court case has been going on for weeks and today they finally came to a verdict. This ex-Oklahoma City police officer was charged with 36 various counts including sexual battery, stalking and more. After 45 hours, the jury finally came to a decision on December 10 and Holtzclaw was found guilty on 18 of the 36 counts. This jury obviously took their time making up their mind. Once they started trying to decide, they were not allowed to go home and took breaks only when it got really late at night, but then started over again in the morning.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The truth of the matter is, the court process is nothing like what you see on television. I have learned that real life versus reality television is very different. The court process is very time consuming. I learned that this process was very drawn out and very lengthy. I manage to be there for almost 3 hours and made it only for the Vo Dior process.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Daniel Lavigne Case

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Daniel R. Lavigne: This is a sentencing hearing. Daniel’s trial was in September of this year and was being charged of impaired driving and refusal to provide a DNA sample. Impaired driving is when the driver’s ability to safely operate a motor vehicle is compromised by the presence of alcohol or drugs in the driver’s system. He was convicted on October 28, 2015.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the case of US vs. Gonzalez-Lopez lies many facts within the case. Some of the reliable facts is that a man named Cuauhtemoc Gonzalez-Lopez was charged with conspiracy to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. His family hired him an attorney by the name of John Fahle to represent him but Lopez had another person in mind. Lopez went ahead and hired attorney Joseph Low to represent him in the hopes of including him with Fahle or instead of. As time went on both attorneys represented Lopez but the Magistrate Judge only accepted Low’s provisional entry of appearance and allowed him to participate only if he immediately file a motion for admission pro hac vice.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At this point, selecting a jury continued. Multiple jurors were questioned while the controversy over Roof’s pro se was happening, and only 35% of them were qualified; the other 65% was excused. Now, the court still needs to find 70 qualified jurors. All these juror cuts are affecting the length of the trial. These people that are picked to be jurors with be separated from friends and family for a longer time than need be.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judicial review of the hearing officer’s decision is only permissible when there is no supporting evidence and/or the hearing officer used improper legal standards, or as the defense phrases it the decision is erroneous. The defense makes various arguments as to why the decision is erroneous. First off, the defense presents two standards to be considered when determining whether a refusal occurred: 1) whether the individual’s statements and behavior objectively indicted a willingness or unwillingness to take the test; and 2) whether cooperation was timely. Gallion 222-223. Second, the argument is made that since when asked if she was refusing the test she expressly stated, four times, that she was not refusing and when being handcuffed made…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Joyner V. Joyner Essay

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Good morning. My name is James Davis, and I am the prosecutor representing Jane Smith, age 36 of Raleigh, North Carolina. Our honorable judge, I trust that you will engage in the entire judging process in a rational, complete way, just as you would as the chief evaluator of any other case under your jurisdiction. After applying relevant rules and significant precedents to our current case, you will undoubtedly arrive at a solution where you will inevitably side with either the husband, the wife, or remain neutral and keep the government out from locked doors and closed curtains. Bear in mind, however, that many precedents in the past may look the same on paper, but are vastly different from what we are due to discuss in this particular courtroom.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of coercion in plea bargains is constitutional according to the Supreme Court. Since plea-bargains for drug courts involve a greater need of coercion than normal court process due to the limited options available, it is considered a leveraging power to help drug users take advantage of the necessary treatment provided. However, the excessive use of coercion has led to many drug offenders entering treatment that are considered understaffed and over capacity (Parsons & Wei, 2015). The excessive use of coercion has also forced a drug courts to choice in behalf of the defendant, since the alternative is facing a jail sentence. Despite the concerns addressed, the courts when challenged of this claim find under the drug court setting that…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The second person came up and stood in front of the judge and she told him the charges, he was approximately twenty five years old, he was not a citizen of the United States, and the judge told him that he could be deported. She sentenced him to four to six years in prison. His original charge was selling one gram of heroin and was sentenced to drug court and treatment. One day after he left drug court treatment he committed burglary, the judge told him to remember what he had learned from treatment while he was in jail, and he also waived his rights to a trial.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I headed into the courtroom of Judge Thomas Marcelain to observe my first courtroom trial. The trial involved a 31-year-old man named, Daniel Bohanna, of Pataskala. Mr. Bohanna decided to represent himself in his trial for fear of misrepresentation. He was charged with rape, kidnapping, and felonious assault. I have seen footage on T.V. from famous trials and of course seen reenactments from Hollywood, but I have never been to one in person until now.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NAME: Swathesh Shetty DATE: 12/10/2015 Leadership for Global Citizenship Questionnaire for the movie “12 Angry Men” 1. In one or two sentences, answer the following: a) What is the purpose of the 12 person jury? The purpose of the 12 person jury is to unanimously decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offence for killing his father based on the data and evidence gathered during the trail in the court.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Superior Court Case Study

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Serena Pang Professor Karl A. Boedecker BUS 301 April 6, 2017 I. Court(s) visited: San Francisco Criminal Divisions of the Superior Court, which is located in 850 Bryant Street, San Francisco. II. Day(s) and Time(s) Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. III. Judge: I could not hear the name of the Judge.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the court asked the District Attorney’s office if this informant was used before they lied and said…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays