Also, the Ransom letter would focus on the handwriting analysis with the unconvincing terms that can identify the suspect. The second piece of analysis to focus on is the handwriting on the ransom note since there any person in this world wont have the same hadwritting kills as the other ones. Handwriting is learned in grade school and the focus is on variables and patterns which will be looked upon if the pen was lifted, how the letters form and if the person uses little or a lot pressure when writing. The forensic invesigators analyizes the handwriting with many past and present documents from the suspects when they are being questioned. The police then asked the parents of JonBenet to both submit handwriting samples to the investigators, therefore; John the father of JonBenet Ramsey was had the most similar handwriting to the ransome note then his wife Patsy. Patsy handwriting was inconclusive but couldn’t be proved that she wrote the letter. After concluding that the police could not seem to rule out if John and Patsy wrote the letter so then the only possibility would have to be another …show more content…
Honestly, the mystery is still there but the truth is beneath that Ramsey house. There was no conviction since they haven’t cracked the case because the evidence is still inconclusive. But for a personal decision, the ransom note was handwriting by a women's writing because of this there is only one woman that had a writing sample which would be Patsy. The evidence is still concluded there is also the DNA from the sexual assault that assaulted JonBenet before she died. Many conclusions towards the death of JonBenet is that the murder is a family member. The case is still ongoing the police investigators are going to do a whole new DNA to finally find the killer until then the case will be still