Jonathan Safran Foer's Let Them Eat Dogs

Improved Essays
Jonathan Safran Foer’s “Let Them Eat Dog” is an article based on why people find it unacceptable to eat dogs. In some countries because of religion it is taboo while others believe the thought of eating a pet is disgusting. Throughout the article Foer tries to justify the reasons why these standards are held to the extent in which it would be okay to eat dog. Foer uses a satirical approach when trying to inform his readers about why dogs are not eaten while using analogies and also proposing the idea of ‘what if’. The comparison between countries and what they eat gives readers an insight of how what may be socially acceptable in one country contradicts that of another. According to the article, “The French, who love their dogs, may eat their horses. The Spanish, who love their horses may eat their cows. The Indians, who love their cows, may eat their dogs.” And the cycle continues. The way it seems here is that no matter where you go, what you eat one place may not be acceptable in another country. A reason these taboos exist may be to differentiate between multiple cultures and the eating of dogs emphasizes it.
The same could be said for the making of animals into food. Near the end of the article, Foer gives a Filipino recipe on how to kill and use dog
…show more content…
For the eating of dogs to be morally acceptable the generalization of dogs has to change. The use of “family pooch” and man’s best friend” in Foer’s article appeals to the general idea of how dogs are seen but what if they were not seen that way but as cattle. Other than the thought of dog meat being wrong to eat, what stops people from eating it? If people are comfortable eating cows, pigs, and chickens, then it would be safe to say that what these animal eat before they are slaughtered are just as acceptable. What the animal is fed is essentially what you are

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    On Eating Animals Analysis

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    While considering the ethical aspects of eating meat, I personally find myself imagining the human as part of a natural circle of life where animals kill and eat each other to survive. Genuine disgust at the cruelty has been evident in the response of donations to animal welfare groups. So it's not to say that farm animals get no sympathy in the United States, but only that Americans somehow don't recognize that cruelty is the norm, not the exception, and is incorporated into the very idea of factory farms; what makes meat cheap is the assembly line processing. Treating animals humanely begins with natural diets, open spaces for living, eliminating the use of hormones that manipulate body weight and mutilations, together with more in depth training for caretakers and inspectors, maybe surveillance cameras, and professionals who enforce laws and prosecute violators, and so on all of which would make meat more expensive. Nothing strikes me as more absurd than calling oneself an animal lover while consuming industrialized meat, though people will surely continue to lie to themselves and even offer various excuses to defend their habit.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The way the author uses such descriptive wording, such as how she describes the long gray veins in the meat that she spears with her fork (182), is a great way to make the reader have the vision of that hunk of meat in their minds. As a lifelong dog owner, Hodgman’s detailing of each brand she chooses and exactly what it looked and smelt like, brought back countless memories of opening dog food cans and that pungent smell hitting me, yuck. The essay just isn’t about a person’s decision to eat dog food, it’s true point is to inform the readers of just how false the advertising is for the food. What are meat by products? Why is soy beans used?…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To show the readers that he is truly concerned about the topic he is questioning them about and not just merely asking to get a response from the readers, he uses the phrase “I’m confused” (Wallace 774) very often. By stating that he is confused he allows himself to ask further questions about the readers morals without attacking them. Foer on the other hand shows no sincerity at all he is blatant with his sarcasm, and continues to use sarcastic tone to clearly show this. For example, his statement about eating dog instead of other animals continues further when he suggests dog meat supplies “would put even the most efficient grass-based farming to shame” (Foer 606). This comparison of a “farming” (Foer 606) system of dogs, known as a human companion, to a traditional farming system, mainly consisting of animals such as cows, shows his lack of sincerity because he doesn’t truly mean that people would eat dog instead of cow.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why do people love eating meat? I guess is something they grow up eating, eating meat is something individuals inherit throughout generations. But Safran reason was because he was just human and he didn’t understand the health crisis and the causes of eating meat. A majority may argue that eating meat is good for the human body the other my say it is bad. Is eating meat a good or bad practice for the human body?…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After reading “Inside the Slaughterhouse”, this article shows why some people don’t like the conditions some animals are put through, to just be a meat on our plate. Many people don’t actually understand what an animal goes through in the process of being killed. The animal when gone through the process of being killed isn’t peaceful and does actually at times feels the pain it is going through. Some people believe that an animals has one cut to the throat and never feels any pain after that, but it’s not the case when one has read the article. For example, a cow is raised in very harsh conditions and is given antibiotics to prevent diseases in the place that they live in.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to this Hindus are divided into two types which are vegetarians and flesh eaters. There is another taboo that's against beef intake. It divides Hindus into those who eat cow's flesh and other people who do not. From the aim of view of untouchability the first distinction is not so important as compared to the second. For it absolutely marks off the tangible from the Untouchables.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jordan Curnutt claims that utilitarian based arguments to defend vegetarianism are inadequate. He presents his own argument, NEW, for vegetarianism and exposes flaws in various attempts to override the prima facie duty of not harming animals. Utilitarian arguments can both favor and oppose vegetarianism. Several philosophers have insisted that utilitarian based arguments require that people eat meat because it improves the economy, helps people who work in the meat industry, and because people enjoy eating meat. Opposing this view, other utilitarian arguments say that vegetarianism is required because killing animals is a violation of their rights and it uses animals as a means to our own ends.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The psychologist Jonathan Haidt is a pioneer in the study of disgust as motivator of moral judgments. In some of his early experiments, he asked individuals to evaluate the ethics of situations which are upsetting even though they do not involve the infliction of suffering or harm. One of his scenarios involved eating pets: A family's dog was killed by a car in front of their home. They had heard that dog meat was delicious so they cut the dog's body up and ate it for dinner. Haidt then ask his subjects if it is okay for a person to eat their dead pet and to explain the logic behind their answer.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    PHIL 4300: Philosophy of Food Dr. Kaplan November 15, 2015 Zack Viator To Eat Meat, or Not to Eat Meat.. LOL In this paper, I will demonstrate the best arguments (in my opinion) both for and against the consumption of meat. I will conclude with my thoughts on meat consumption and why I think the best stance is a middle ground between eating meat how society currently does and not eating meat such as a vegetarian does. Arguments AGAINST eating meat: a. Cruelty- The ethical argument against eating animals is obvious. How can we cause harm to another sentient being? Livestock is raised with the intention of killing for food, at least eventually.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the article is presented as strictly scientific, Brassey uses phrases such as “greedy mutation” and “food obsession” to make the audience feel as if Labradors can’t help that they’re obese. Analyzing the topic, the word “obesity” tends to have a negative connotation, so its use serves as an unwanted consequence in relation to any topic. On the other hand, Labradors are referred as “our most popular canine companion” in the article. Dog lovers will experience negative feelings of sadness to see obesity occurring in a beloved animal and will want to learn about the efforts to prevent obesity addressed in this article. The use of this device creates an audience that is willing to read this article in order to take action in a struggle between a negative consequence and a lovable animal.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays