Johnathan Miller Case Study

to try to work with “Mr. Johnathan Miller”, but he is a very hard person to work with. We have had numerous scheduled appointments in which majority of them were canceled by Mr. Miller or cut short because he had me meet him at the circuit courthouse in Elkton, MD on the days he had trials. He then would reschedule with me, “Promising we’d have more time to go over my case”, but again the same thing would occur, or “He would cancel and make an excuse why he could not show up for our meetings.” This has been a common theme when it comes to dealing with Mr. Miller. I have reached out to the public defender’s office on several occasions for help, but Mr. Henderson has refused to do anything in regards to Mr. Miller and has yet to even call me back after I have left him several messages. …show more content…
Henderson’s boss “Stephan Skipp” for assistants and he has fused to do anything either. How can I prepare for a criminal case such as the one I’m facing if my lawyer isn’t doing his job?! Mr. Miller has broken several “Rules of professional conduct” under the Maryland law. Rule 19-301.1 clearly states; An attorney shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. Rule 19-301.3; An attorney shall act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client. Rule 19-301.4; (a) An attorney shall: (3) promptly comply with reasonable requests for