John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism And Intellectual Pleasures

Superior Essays
Utilitarianism is a moral doctrine that implies that the right course of action is the one that produces the greatest balance of benefits over harms for everyone affected. Bentham, the founder of Utilitarianism defined happiness is to be anything that causes pleasure and unhappiness is to be anything that causes pain. John Stuart Mill, an English philosopher and economist, took Bentham’s moral theories on Utilitarianism and developed them farther. Mill formed all of his ideas off of Bentham’s theories on utilitarianism. Bentham called the Utilitarianism principle the principle of utility, and believed that ones actions can be judged by it. However, Mill called it the Greatest Happiness Principle and said that, “actions are right in proportion …show more content…
Intellectual pleasures are pleasures such as learning new information, solving puzzles, reading a good book, or making a discovery. Physical pleasures are things such as eating food, taking a nap, having sex, nature, art or numerous social pleasures. According to Mill the highest good is what produces the most pleasure. This means that whatever pleasure creates the most amount of happiness for the most amount of people is considered the more valuable pleasure. Mill says that physical pleasures and based off of quantity because people come across physical pleasures more often. Intellectual pleasures on the other hand are based off of quality because they provide a strong and long lasting effect. The purpose of this essay is to argue that intellectual pleasures are of higher value than physical pleasures. Intellectual pleasures are of greater value because unlike physical pleasures, intellectual pleasures are entirely self contained, they are not dependent upon ones body, and like Mill states, has a longer lasting and stronger …show more content…
These two pleasures also differ in worth. According to Utilitarianism intellectual pleasures are worthy of being desired and pursued more than animal pleasures therefore they are of higher value than physical pleasures. Intellectual and physical pleasures are According to Mill, a pleasure is of higher quality if one that experienced both would prefer it over the other. Mill contends, it is an "unquestionable fact" that, given equal access to all kinds of pleasures, people will prefer those that appeal to their "higher" faculties (No Philosophy of Swine). Intellectual pleasures are of higher character than physical pleasures because physical pleasures are seen to be animalistic. The whole goal of utilitarianism is to create happiness. To be happy a human being requires other things, and perhaps more things, than physical pleasures provide. “Human beings have faculties more elevated than the animal appetites, and when once made conscious of them, do not regard anything as happiness which does not include their gratification”(No Philosophy for Swine). According to Mill, a person will never choose to lower their existence by choosing a physical pleasure, to maintain their dignity instead. Mill writes, “It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    According to Mill each pleasure is unique and of different quality based on what caused it. All creatures possess basic pleasures such as sleep and sex. Humans also possess these pleasures but they also possess more intelligent pleasures such as music and art. If a majority of humans prefer one pleasure over another then that pleasure is of superior quality to its counterpart. Mill argues that because we are more intelligent creatures we have a deeper understanding of pleasure and thus can experience a greater joy.…

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pleasure In The Odyssey

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mill's writings defines pleasure as avoiding pain. He goes on to describe pleasure as taking form. These forms can consist of "beauty, of ornament, or of amusement" (Mill,1863). Pleasure is ranked lower if the pleasure is primal like sex or eating, higher ranked pleasures are more intellectual. If you choose between reading the Odyssey and spending time eating a cake you are choosing between high and low pleasures.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question #1: In order to effectively answer this problem I will first provide a brief definition of the positive thesis brought forth by the moral theory of Utilitarianism. As stated by Mill in his article “In Defense of Utilitarianism”, “an act is right if and only if it brings about the greatest total amount of happiness out of all the actions available to the agent, whereby happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain”. (Mill 1990, 172). Essentially, Mill stated in his article that Utilitarianism defines a morally correct action to be one that produces the maximum amount of utility or pleasure within an act.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is believed that it is too strict a requirement for Utilitarianism to imply that we should always act solely to maximize happiness. It is then asking too much of people to be always centrally focused on promoting happiness for the general human population. Mill responds to such criticism by stating that “…no system of ethics requires that the sole motive of all we do shall be a feeling of duty,” but rather that “utilitarian moralists have gone beyond almost everyone in asserting that the motive has nothing to do with the morality of the action though it has much to do with the worth of the agent.” (13) This therefore, asserts that the motives behind an action will have nothing to do with whether or not we should complete an action solely based on its morality. He states that the great majority of these good actions are intended not for the benefit of the world, but for that of its…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In philosophy there are many stands to take when it comes to a view of topic shared and discovered by many. Specifically, there are three philosophers that have differing ideas on the role of pleasure in morality, Aristotle, Kant, and Mill. They share and clarify their positions through a plethora of titles and information that will help a reader gain a better understanding of the role of pleasure in morality. Though each philosopher has their own share of ideas of what the highest good represents, they all believe in morality being the search for the highest good. Aristotle begins with his description of happiness as fulfillment of all desires, in accordance with compliance of virtue.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is desired by many as an end result, but Mill does not explain it with a clear and cogent…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, there are higher and lower pleasures, higher pleasures consisting of when one pleasure is desirable over another even if…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An action is right in so far as it promotes happiness, and that the greatest happiness of the greatest number should be the guiding principle of conduct. As blacks are labelled as a minority in our American society, the main agreement would be that we don’t bring the greatest amount of joy to those with power. Within the same article, Mill introduces “The Greatest Happiness Principle, it is the ultimate end with reference to and for the sake of which all other things are desirable is an existence exempt as far as possible from pain, and as rich as possible in…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is based on the Utilitarian principle that one should act towards the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This promotes happiness and pleasure while condemning anything that causes pain. Mill believes that the purpose for any person’s actions is to experience pleasure or to avoid pain. Though this ultimate telos for happiness may seem like a good system, there are flaws that do not coincide with human nature. One issue with this theory is that it does not take into consideration that different people have different preferences and ideas of what is pleasurable.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Since a very young age we have been told by our parents to always tell the truth. But, do we always follow that order? No. Sometimes people lie. Lying can be defined as when a person knows the truth, but instead he says otherwise.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Mill, happiness is the only thing that is desirable as an end in itself because happiness produces pleasure as well as the release of…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In ethics there are hundreds of theories that try to define morality. Utilitarianism is one of these theories that seems to simply be that if one is being moral, their decisions will create the greatest amount of happiness for everyone (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). This theory has been defended by many, including Jeremey Bentham, who popularized quantitative utilitarianism, and John Stuart Mill, who believed that utilitarianism was actually qualitative (Wilkens, 2011). While utilitarianism as a whole can seem clear-cut, John Stuart Mill’s theory of qualitative utilitarianism has many ethical problems, and is too simple to accurately address every moral decision. Utilitarianism is a fairly popular viewpoint when it comes to morality because it…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivie Eboigbodin Qualitative and Quantitative Pleasures Qualitative and Quantitative pleasures come out of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism can often be thought of as dangerous and wretched because it allows for seriously immoral acts to take place. Utilitarianism argues for maximum pleasure to take place, but in doing so can allow such acts as rape, torture etc. Therefore many disregard the act because of its possible immoral acts that could take place. However the Philosopher Mill has come up with two different levels of pleasure, qualitative and quantitative, to determine which acts are worth pursuing.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays