John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

Improved Essays
The western world has many freedoms in comparison to other nations around the world, especially in terms of political liberty; there are, however, many aspects of the political climate that remain turbulent. One of these aspects, the freedom of speech, is powerfully addressed in philosopher John Stuart Mill's novel, On Liberty. Mill argues that, “[i]f all mankind minus one were of one opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.” he justifies this claim through further explaining that silencing the views of an individual could prove to be harmful not only to the individual, but also society as a whole. This is due to the fact that exchanging opposing views through debating in a in a productive and informative manner can result in …show more content…
Mill goes on to state that an individual with opinions that contrast your own always has a chance of being correct; all arguments contain fragments of the truth, and it is only through discussing the opposing views that the truth will come to the surface, and a mutual agreement can be made(43). Nevertheless, according to Mill, even an incorrect opinion should not, under any circumstances be silenced as doing so goes against the concept of having the liberty to speak freely regarding one’s views. There are, however, certain limitations stated by Mill in regards to his belief that all individuals should have the right to free speech. Mill believes that members of society should be entitled to do as they please, provided that they are not misusing this right through conducting themselves in a bigoted or intolerant manner towards others around them. These attitudes can be exemplified through the obvious dislike for another individual

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    regardless of whether it is harmful to others. In ‘On Liberty' John Stuart Mill discusses the harm principle as: "The only purpose for which power can be rightly exercised over any member of a civilized community against his will, is to prevent harm to others” (68). Mill’s states that a government or society does not have the right to prevent people from actions unless the actions are harmful to others in society. Although government intervention…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In On Liberty, John Stuart Mill outlines his unique political theory based on the liberty of men in society. His argument stands out because it is not typical social contract theory. It does not begin by examining men in the state of nature, it does not outline an ideal government structure, and the contract itself is vague, though not without a purpose. Mill establishes a social contract through the unconventional means of the “harm principle.” Through it he creates an agreement among men in a society…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty attempts to broaden the meaning of utility and depict the usefulness of utilitarianism in terms of right protection. With this, Mill rejects the coercion of conformity and celebrates individuality. His work can be broken down into two basic principles. The first principle establishes that people are not accountable to society for the actions that only concern themselves. The second, also known as the harm principle, establishes that the individual is accountable for…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays