John Stuart Mill's Main Determinant Of Utilitarianism

Decent Essays
John Stuart Mill did not establish Utilitarianism but instead renovated it to become an obtainable, suitable theory. The main determinant of Utilitarianisms is the Greatest Happiness principle; this principle states that a human’s main goal within their life is to have the uttermost amount of pleasure and the least amount of pain throughout their existence. Not just relating to the individual's own happiness, but that we should all produce the greatest happiness for everybody. For one person to always have the intention to create happiness for everyone and always have a successful outcome cannot always be the case. One’s personal intent for happiness cannot guarantee every person to agree that the outcome is considered beneficial. Having that

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When he [Kant] begins to deduce from this precept [i.e. CI] any of the actual duties of morality, he fails, almost grotesquely, to show that there would be any contradiction, any logical (not to say physical) impossibility, in the adoption by all rational beings of the most outrageously immoral rules of conduct. All he shows is that the consequences of their universal adoption would be such as no one would choose to incur. Here Mill considers of consequences in moral action, as we will see, Mill’s consequentialism rather than Utilitarianism is the direct charge made to Kant, these two notions are not same, the utiitlirms principle is seek happiness and avoid pain, precisely moral action would be conducted on maximizing happiness and minimizing…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question #1: In order to effectively answer this problem I will first provide a brief definition of the positive thesis brought forth by the moral theory of Utilitarianism. As stated by Mill in his article “In Defense of Utilitarianism”, “an act is right if and only if it brings about the greatest total amount of happiness out of all the actions available to the agent, whereby happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain”. (Mill 1990, 172). Essentially, Mill stated in his article that Utilitarianism defines a morally correct action to be one that produces the maximum amount of utility or pleasure within an act.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A utilitarian looking at this situation will agree that in this case, the consequences of maintaining this pregnancy and treating the infant after birth appear to be grievous and result in pain and suffering for more individuals to a higher extent than it would achieve happiness. The drawbacks offset the benefits of Anna's desired actions. One such negative consequence is negatively influencing society by increasing health care costs for an infant that will inevitably die. There will be increased educational program cost and attention, and increased societal energy to support this life and to allow him/her to have a good quality of life. John Stewart Mill (a philosopher that also discusses act utilitarianism) would support an additional consequence…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In reading chapters three and four of John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism, I noticed two conclusions made by Mills that are up for debate. The first statement is made in chapter 3, is that as we as a society become more unified and equal, utilitarianism as it is defined can be the influential factor in our decision making. The second conclusion that jumped out to me was in chapter four, and is simplified by saying that a person thinks something is generally pleasant if it is desirable.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to understand the position of John Stuart Mill in both of these situations, one must recognize what he advocates. Therefore, it is reasonable to assess the concept of utilitarianism with his work, “Utilitarianism”. The rudimentary perception behind this philosophical notion is that deeds are ethically correct only if they produce the greatest overall amount of good for everyone, or in this case, happiness. This is otherwise known as, “the effects of things upon their happiness, the principle of utility, or as Bentham latterly called it, the greatest happiness principle” (Mill, 2004). Using this straightforward characterization of utilitarianism, both scenarios can be appropriately evaluated in terms of what Mill would tell the rescuer to do concerning who the survivors should consist…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In John Stuart Mills “Utilitarianism” he argues that a humans pleasures are much more superior than an animals pleasures. “Better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a pig satisfied.” Utilitarianism requires making a choice that will lead to happiness for you and everyone else involved. As a pig or an animal they do not have the mental capacity to make an autonomous decision so they have no control and if they seek to be satisfied they wouldn’t care for those they hurt along the way. Pigs and beasts cannot make a rational decision, but humans can.…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill, clearly believed that the principle of the utilitarianism theory is that the actions must be right to the degree that they tend to…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Utilitarianism is defined as an act for the interest of all. This theory states that everyone should perform the act that will bring about the greatest good for everyone, no matter if the benefits are produced by lies, manipulation, or coercion. “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” –John Stuart Mill An example of Utilitarianism that I have experienced is usually at work. I work at a school for autistic, mentally ill and behavioral children and young adults.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill Essay

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Stuart Mill’s advocates and supports that Utilitarianism is in fact a moral theory under what he calls the Greatest Happiness Principle. The term “utility,” in Mill’s opinion can be described in the Greatest Happiness principle. In the Greatest Happiness Principle, Mill’s elucidate that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill). His argument under this principle was that the equality of pleasure comes from an individual’s higher faculties.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main principle of Mill’s utilitarianism is the greatest happiness principle, which is defined as: actions are right insofar as they maximize general utility, which Mill recognizes as happiness (Cahn & Markie, 2009). He argues that happiness is the only source of morality and that people never desire anything but happiness (Cahn & Markie, 2009). Mill supports this claim by displaying that all other objects of people’s desire are either means to happiness, or included in the definition of happiness (Cahn & Markie, 2009). Mill describes happiness as pleasure and the absence of pain, and the only desirable end, the final good (Cahn & Markie, 2009). Every other desirable thing exists either for the pleasure they provide, or as a means to pleasure…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Chapter 2 of “Utilitarianism,” John Stuart Mill argues for Utilitarianism as a moral theory by considering several objections and addressing misconceptions. His definition of Utilitarianism relates to Theory of Right Action and Theory of the Good. The Theory of Right Action is connected to Consequentialism. The Theory of Right Action states that only the outcomes, or consequences, of an action determine how right the action is. Intentions are irrelevant.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Millions of people die each year due to Cancer and AIDS, if this could be prevented simply by trading 3,000 involuntary humans to aliens for tortuous and lethal medical experiments, would it be morally justifiable? Depending on the different ethical approaches, the answer to this may vary. John Stuart Mill, a utilitarian, believed that good comes from human pleasure and that an act should benefit the majority of society for it to be good. Immanuel Kant studied deontology and believed that good will is “good without qualification” (301)1. This approach meant that an act was only good if the motivation behind it was pure.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mill’s Utilitarianism is a seemingly simple yet quixotic approach to the issue of what makes a moral action. Mill believes that the goodness of a moral action depends on the amount of happiness it creates. However, critics find issue with this principle because if the end result of maximizing happiness is all that matters, unjust actions such as murder are moral as long as they maximize happiness. Despite his efforts of ameliorating this problem with his concept of justice, his use of justice is inherently flawed.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In ethics there are hundreds of theories that try to define morality. Utilitarianism is one of these theories that seems to simply be that if one is being moral, their decisions will create the greatest amount of happiness for everyone (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). This theory has been defended by many, including Jeremey Bentham, who popularized quantitative utilitarianism, and John Stuart Mill, who believed that utilitarianism was actually qualitative (Wilkens, 2011). While utilitarianism as a whole can seem clear-cut, John Stuart Mill’s theory of qualitative utilitarianism has many ethical problems, and is too simple to accurately address every moral decision. Utilitarianism is a fairly popular viewpoint when it comes to morality because it…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays