Discussion Of Happiness In John Stuart Mill's Moral Theory

Superior Essays
Happiness in John Stuart Mill’s moral theory is the ‘greatest happiness principle’ which he calls utilitarianism. He believes that everyone is capable of happiness. Immanuel Kant moral theory is the one of moral duties, meaning that one’s actions should be from moral alone not for the consequences; like happiness. Kant claims that those who are debt free are the happiest because they are also guilt free. Friedrich Nietzsche moral theory are two; master and slave morality. In both theories he points out that the happy people are the noble because they have what they want and have power over the common. The common are filled with hatred and resentment therefore, their happiness comes in the afterlife. Kant and Nietzsche view on happiness both …show more content…
He says that in master morality the ‘good’ arises from the noble and powerful because they are the ones who define the term and consider themselves as ‘good’. They call themselves ‘good’ because if they compare themselves with the poor and the weak they are ‘good’ and the poor are ‘bad’. They get to make such decision because they have power over the common. He points out that the word ‘good’ comes from the same root as the words powerful, masters, rich which makes them happy. The common people are associated with lying and cowardice which makes them unhappy. Lower orders of society are related to variants on the word unhappy. Nobles saw themselves as naturally happy. Nietzsche points out that the Jews from hatred changed the moral valuation from master morality to slave morality. Where now the poor see themselves as ‘good’ and the powerful are now ‘evil’. So the moral code changed from what was ‘good’ became ‘evil’ and what was once ‘bad’ became ‘good’. The noble man’s good is precisely what the man of resentment calls ‘evil’. Justice is an invention of slave morality made out as an ideal that masters bravely disregard. Slave morality does not seek revenge, but waits for the “judgement of god” that will restore

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill and Aristotle spent a lot of time defining and talking about happiness and how virtue can make one happy and also be a means to our end. According to Aristotle, virtue comes from practicing habit and good upbringing. In the society today, people think happiness is all about money and fame, but Aristotle believes that virtue is the one thing that can bring us happiness. According to Mill, he doesn’t agree that virtue is the end or rather the principal thing that makes us happy, rather Mill believes that pleasure is what brings happiness and also freedom from pain (Mill). He has a very different idea from Aristotle.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Summum bonum is the highest form of good according to the values and priorities in an ethical system. For John Stuart Mill, the summum bonum is happiness. Mill is lead to this belief by regarding happiness as the ultimate aim of humanity – to live a life as free from pain and as rich in enjoyment as possible. This is the ideology of utilitarianism, or Mill’s moral theory that judges the ethicality of an action following its utility. Mill’s argument of chapter 2 of Utilitarianism is defining the greatest happiness principle and addressing misconceptions and criticisms opponents have.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative moral approach to ethics that tries to maximise the pleasure and minimises the amount of pain in given a situation. John Stuart Mill analysis the principle of Utility, Utility meaning ‘happiness’. Mill often thought it was important that in any given situation that happiness is supposed to continue to be uplifted (Mill, 1864 p.9). Mill examines, that happiness is the ultimate end in which every human lives their life to, and so anything has to be a means for that end to happen (Mill, 1864 p.52). In linguistic terms, it can be described as a “’theory of usefulness’”…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill—a philosopher whom believed that another name for utility is the greatest form of happiness, a principal lead by the clause “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness are intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure”. With this, Mill presents the concept of utility as a stem from the presence of pleasure and the absence of pain within basic desires. According to Mill, the more valuable a pleasure becomes, the more of likelihood that an individual will employ higher faculties. Mill often juxtaposes human values of pleasure with that of pain.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It follows then that an individual’s actions are counted as being moral or immoral by how useful those actions are to the majority of people. There is no law or universal rule that trumps the fact that a larger quantity of people are seen as more useful than a smaller quantity from a utilitarian perspective. Similarly, John Stuart Mill would justify his recommendation to Jim in accordance to the theory of consequentialism or determining whether an action is right or wrong by analyzing the consequence it produces. If the act performed benefits a large group of people, the many instead of the few, then it is considered to be right or moral. On these premises Mill could then assure Jim that his actions were moral because more lives were being…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will outline Mill’s argument of the Greatest-happiness Principle, and how he tries to dinguses himself from traditional Hedonism views, and raise the question if virtue for its own sake, produces…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The recent events below have led to a series of protests over the past year but recently in the media the public has been advocating for the rights of African Americans in America based off of the neglect of the justice system for these young black men. These situations were all against young black males that had absolutely no reason to be murdered as a means to a solution. As these three situations only stand as representations of the many black male to be victimized by the police system in America it also shows us that although we have made strides in race relations and equality we still have a very long and tiring journey to go to be fully accepted by our fellow counterpart. Laquan McDonald was shot 16 times by a Chicago…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Schopenhauer and Nietzsche on Compassion Many different interpretations of the word compassion exist. For me, compassion involves a deep feeling of sympathy and sorrow for another human being or animal who is stricken by misfortune, accompanied by a wish to help them. Although it is strongly related to altruism and empathy, compassion is something different - it is an immense feeling of ‘suffering’ together and then doing something about it. However, in the history of philosophy, compassion was often related to pity. Mariette Willemsen wrote that compassion is a “neutral term for a feeling that is often called pity in the English tradition [...] and Mitleid by German philosophers” (Schopenhauer and Nietzsche) (p.182).…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He distinguishes happiness level by level. He says that happiness has different quality, and high quality happiness is more valuable. However, it is hard to qualify happiness. Different people have different experience, and this causes people have different definition of pleasure. It is hard to say one thing has higher quality compared to another easily because people preferences differ.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All three writers seem to agree that it is a person’s job to choose their own happiness. For Aristotle, this means acting with virtue to bring about true happiness and Kant would say that people choose to be happy by following our moral duty. Mill would support this claim with his idea that happiness can be broken down into separate categories, which he refers to as higher and lower pleasures. From there, Mill believes people choose which type of pleasures people would like to associate themselves with in order to achieve happiness. Another point multiple authors would agree would be that true happiness can only come from doing good.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Utilitarianism,” John Stuart Mill argues that consequences of an action are all that really matter. Defining utilitarianism at its core, is a theory holding that the moral rightness and/or wrongness of an action depends entirely on the consequences of that action. Thereby agreeing that an action or decision is considered good if it generates happiness and bad if it generates the reverse. In his ethical approach, Mill suggests that the measure of success and happiness depends on how many people and how much happiness was developed as a result of that action, or the “greatest happiness principle.” This principle, Mill declares, “holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays