John Stuart Mill Research Paper

Improved Essays
Our society faces a lot of challenges despite living in such a liberal world. We like to limit the activities we are not okay with or don’t understand so in terms we label them as wrong or even outlaw them. We don’t like to experiment new ways of life because we are often times too comfortable living in our own shell of what is good and what is not that anything outside of it is considered to be erroneous. John Stuart Mill stresses on the issue of conscience and individuality. Mill’s theory is that society should be free of any constrains, we should allow different opinions and experiments of living in order for man to be true to his nature. Society must facilitate and provide these alternatives of living in order for society to be vibrant …show more content…
By doing this we grow and learn from those experiments and live in the true nature of man.
John Mill writes “As it is useful while mankind are imperfect there should be different opinions, so is it that there should be different experiment of living; that free scope should be given to varieties of character, short of injury to others; and that the worth of different modes of life should be proved practically, when any one thinks fit to try them.” (Mill, 65) Mill is not suggesting that actions should be as free as opinions. In the contrary, actions and the liberty of a person should be limited, only to the extent that he doesn't become an inconvenience or harm to others. As long as he acts in his own desires and intuitions, opinion and actions should be free to practice at the persons own cost. Having experiments of life should be the main concern in everyones minds, however, the majority of people are considered to be average and practice the norms. Mill writes, “But the evil is, that individual spontaneity is hardly recognized by the common modes of thinking, as having any intrinsic worth, or deserving any regard on his on account.” (Mill, 65) In other words, people who are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s main idea is that the thought behind your actions is what determines if it’s wrong or right, not the outcome, he uses categorical imperative. So, the moral of your action is judged by the principal that provokes the action, not the outcome as I stated above. He calls these principles “maxim”. He says “the only acceptable maxim are those that can be defined as a universal law, because it is without exception” (pg.98). He uses an example of his view of morality of suicide.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ends don’t always justify the means. Mill also believes in free will which has its issues. People can’t be trusted, because if people were given complete freedom to decide how and when to act in attaining greater good, they would all be selfish. People would act on selfish reasons and justify their actions as if they were for the greater good.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world is a vast place, filled with numerous individuals, all characterized by unique qualities. John Stuart Mill, a 19th century writer, philosopher, and businessman who placed great importance on those who find and offer new ideas, theorized that the two primary qualities in life were originality and genius. An original person is one who is independent of all others and is unique in all that they do, and someone who displays genius is unusually intelligent and creative. In “Genius and Originality”, Mill suggests that these qualities are indispensable in society since they prevent life and knowledge from becoming static, and without them, society cannot progress. He proposes that conformity is preventing genius and originality from flourishing, while freedom allows them to thrive.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This passage starts with how every moral standard have been asked a multiple of questions regarding to why follow that type of morality and where exactly does the thinking and power to use that morality standard come from? The problem here is that many people don’t see or more understand the theory and objectives of utilitarian morality. People, when given a principle that as Mill says “which custom has not thrown the same halo” will most likely give more attention to the end results rather than the main objective. With utilitarianism, like every other moral standard, it also has sanctions that can affect the decisions made with utilitarian morality. External sanctions can come from peer pressure, the approval of others or the fear of God.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although technology has greatly increased our ability to communicate and to communicate freely, it has also, as Cass Sunstein points out, "greatly increased people’s ability to “filter” what they want to read, see, and hear. " In other words, technology has facilitated our wishes to view opinions that we find favorable. Naturally aiming to find happiness through pleasure, we are not as compelled to seek out materials the challenge, frustrate, or upset us. In the harm principle, Mill assumes that we regularly interact with offensive opinions, people, and actions. He is right to assume this for the time during which he was writing wherein communication was less controlled as most of it was done face-to-face or by newspaper, for example.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First the citizens must give themselves up to the law of the society, they must allow restrictions and limits to be placed upon them for the society to run effectively. Secondly the citizens must put themselves under the protection of the society and trust that they will be defended and taken care of. When this trust is given to the society and the government then they can effectively protect and ensure “the peace, safety, and public good of the people. This is contrary to what Mill would argue as he does not believe citizens should submit themselves to society and give away their rights. He believes that as an individual citizen you should fight for your opinion and never give into society.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill’s theory talks about utilitarianism which talks about the action that people take should be in accord to promote overall human happiness. Happiness to Mill is pleasure and no amount of pain which is also considered the highest good. Which in turn defines good as the same thing as pleasures without pain. Utilitarian’s says we should consider everyone’s pleasure and not just our own. Although, there are different types of pleasure which he refers to as higher and lower pleasures.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the value of free will can never be understated, the over-enactment of one’s rights, in such a manner that they limit the freedoms of another, are detrimental to the society as a whole, as it weakens the case for the practice of such rights. Authoritarian governments are hostile to the creation of genius, as much as the total anarchy eats it away from the inside. The restraints Mill implies here are simply that; stating that man’s search for effective government hinges upon its understanding of the balance needed between lawful protections and individual liberties; the creation of a society free of choice and sheltered from…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s’ essay also argues that freedom of speech and diversifying opinions act as a fuel that drives social progress. Mill states, “... the only unfailing and permanent source of improvement is liberty, since by it there are as many possible independent centres of improvement as there are individuals” (Mill 65). One can gather that Mill believes that liberty is necessary for improvement and the more liberty present in individual members of society the more persons influencing change. This is an important message for our society to receive and is in accordance with our liberal democratic society. It demonstrates the importance of individuals and how their freedoms positively contribute to society because, as Mill bluntly states, without individuality…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stuart Mill Individuality

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    That is because customs, which may have once had meaning and served a purpose, quickly lose any significance with repetitive, mindless participation. Mill believed that the ongoing practice by the masses would lead to a mentally stagnant society. In chapter 3 in On Liberty, he depicts three cases that illustrate why custom can be detrimental to humanity. In the first, practitioners of a custom may have some evidence, possibly through their own experiences, that support their involvement.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Anthony William Whaley 14 October 2015 Political Theory On, Experiments of Living One of John Stuart Mill’s biggest contribution through his writings was his idea of the “experiments of living”. Mill made this contribution in his classic 1859 book, On Liberty. By “experiments of living” I believe Mill is saying to live life like a test tube; in Mill’s exact words, “different modes of life should be proved practically”. In other words, the ability to be able to do whatever you want, until it causes some sort of harm to another human being in order to determine the best way of living for the individual.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill believes that he figured out a way to overcome the opportunity for immoral acts to take place. But even Mill’s distinction of the…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays