John Stuart Mill Research Paper

Improved Essays
The Principle of Utility states that actions or behaviors are right, as long as they promote happiness or pleasure, actions or behaviors are considered wrong if they tend to produce unhappiness or pain. Or in simpler words, the Principle of Utility determines the rightness of acts by their effect on the total happiness. Mill claims that pleasure can differ in quality and quantity, and that pleasures that are rooted in one's higher faculties should be weighted more heavily than baser pleasures. Mill says “Human beings have faculties more elevated than the animal appetites, and when once made conscious of them, do not regard anything as happiness which does not include their gratification,”. Basically Mill is saying in this statement that when humans are finally aware of how much happiness they can actually achieve, they do everything to keep it at that level and if they don’t reach that goal, they are dissatisfied, which says a lot on how much being happy …show more content…
He is essentially saying that Happiness is different for everyone, particularly because everyone’s personality and experience is so diverse. For example, a child living in a First World country, getting to eat everyday isn’t so high on the Happy scale but compared to a child living in a Third World country where food is scarce, getting their opportunity to eat is a very joyous moment. In terms of virtue, Mill states “The desire of virtue is not as universal, but it is as authentic a fact, as the desire of happiness,”. He states that individuals love virtue because it happens to be a portion of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s main idea is that the thought behind your actions is what determines if it’s wrong or right, not the outcome, he uses categorical imperative. So, the moral of your action is judged by the principal that provokes the action, not the outcome as I stated above. He calls these principles “maxim”. He says “the only acceptable maxim are those that can be defined as a universal law, because it is without exception” (pg.98). He uses an example of his view of morality of suicide.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill believes that pleasure is something that can bring good things to people and thereby bringing good things…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world is a vast place, filled with numerous individuals, all characterized by unique qualities. John Stuart Mill, a 19th century writer, philosopher, and businessman who placed great importance on those who find and offer new ideas, theorized that the two primary qualities in life were originality and genius. An original person is one who is independent of all others and is unique in all that they do, and someone who displays genius is unusually intelligent and creative. In “Genius and Originality”, Mill suggests that these qualities are indispensable in society since they prevent life and knowledge from becoming static, and without them, society cannot progress. He proposes that conformity is preventing genius and originality from flourishing, while freedom allows them to thrive.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He argues that not all pleasures can possibly be the same because if they were then all humans would wish to be lower creatures. Mill’s point is that we are more than swine looking for simple pleasure. As more intelligent creatures we are looking for greater fulfillment found in higher pleasures such as art and…

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is believed that it is too strict a requirement for Utilitarianism to imply that we should always act solely to maximize happiness. It is then asking too much of people to be always centrally focused on promoting happiness for the general human population. Mill responds to such criticism by stating that “…no system of ethics requires that the sole motive of all we do shall be a feeling of duty,” but rather that “utilitarian moralists have gone beyond almost everyone in asserting that the motive has nothing to do with the morality of the action though it has much to do with the worth of the agent.” (13) This therefore, asserts that the motives behind an action will have nothing to do with whether or not we should complete an action solely based on its morality. He states that the great majority of these good actions are intended not for the benefit of the world, but for that of its…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill—a philosopher whom believed that another name for utility is the greatest form of happiness, a principal lead by the clause “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness are intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure”. With this, Mill presents the concept of utility as a stem from the presence of pleasure and the absence of pain within basic desires. According to Mill, the more valuable a pleasure becomes, the more of likelihood that an individual will employ higher faculties. Mill often juxtaposes human values of pleasure with that of pain.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill, a philosopher during the mid-1800’s, is known as one of the most important western political philosophers in the past three hundred years. Many of his arguments on freedom can be seen intertwined with the current way we run societies around the world today. Being a self proclaimed Utilitarian, Mill focuses his arguments on making the collective reside with the most utility possible, with utility being defined by happiness. To achieve maximum utility, Mill presents three larger arguments,the harm principle, experiments of living, and freedom of speech. Before one can begin to agree or criticize Mill's arguments they must first delve into the core of Mill’s teachings, the harm principle.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill defines utilitarianism as “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness,” (484) He then begins to explain that happiness is the absence of pain, and pain is the absence of pleasure. He refers to utilitarianism as the Greatest Happiness Principle. Many people that disagreed with Mill’s definition of utilitarianism insulted his work by stating it as a “doctrine worthy only of swine,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this attack by stating “...for if the sources of pleasure were precisely the same to human beings and to swine, the rule of which is good enough for the one would be good enough for the other,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this insult by comparing human…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain versus unhappiness which is pain and the absences of pleasure. Mill thinks pleasures and happiness are the same. If something brings you pleasure, then you are happy. Just as if you are happy something has brought you pleasure. Take for example food, it is only desired to stop and/or prevent hunger which brings happiness to the person starving.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Now, let’s look at what Mill would do in our situation. So not only are we wanting to make a choice that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number. The greatest number is for all that will be affected by the decision that is made. Mill's greatest happiness (principle utility) means that we should choose the option that will give them the most happiness. The problem is Mill believes that the best happiness is achieved when everyone is happy and there is an absence of pain and suffering.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are also many conflicting situations that people face since their judgments of pleasure are different. This disprove Mill’s argument that pleasure’s quality is one of the main part of moral actions. His logic of high quality pleasure is hard to prove since everyone’s happiness is different. A result might have different meanings to varied people, so it is hard to find the sum of happiness. Morality is balanced to people’s true happiness, but not based on the sum of…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Principia Ethica Summary

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Recall from the discussion about how G. E. Moore disputed the position of ethical “naturalists”. And we all know about Moore had his own theory of ethical specialized on meta-ethics, which used logic and ideas from linguistics to analyze the ethical concepts, the properties and meaning of judgments and etc. For Moore, who focused on analysis of the logic in moral language, explained the meaning of moral language, and divided up the content of moral language with the actual language. He advocated the importance of been “neutrally” for any ethical believe and principle system, then study the problem upon this base of acknowledgement.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is based on the Utilitarian principle that one should act towards the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This promotes happiness and pleasure while condemning anything that causes pain. Mill believes that the purpose for any person’s actions is to experience pleasure or to avoid pain. Though this ultimate telos for happiness may seem like a good system, there are flaws that do not coincide with human nature. One issue with this theory is that it does not take into consideration that different people have different preferences and ideas of what is pleasurable.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays