John Stuart Mill On Happiness Essay

Improved Essays
The proper route to obtain eternal happiness is a controversial subject for many. Should one constantly focus on his own personal happiness, or should one make the happiness of others his priority? What if the individual who endeavors never-ending euphoria is indeed the most broken inside? This concept was the chief issue in the autobiography of John Stuart Mill, a 19th century English philosopher. Mill's reasoning of just 'going with the flow' by concentrating less about personal happiness is unmistakably the most supreme path to increased satisfaction in anyone's lifestyle. Mill's principle belief is that happiness is nonviable when one directs his behavior solely to his own wellbeing. How is that possible, though, to not …show more content…
Many popular children's books encourage the virtue of generosity. The well-known tale of The Rainbow Fish, by Marcus Pfister, features a fish who possesses traits that contrasts Mill's mindset. The rainbow fish has bright beautiful scales that the other dull-colored fish in the sea swoon and beg for. His scales are his only source of pride and joy though, so he wants to keep them all for himself. Gradually, the other fish begin to back away from him. Soon, the the rainbow fish realizes how egotistic he is, so he decides to alter his attitude. He begins to gift pieces of his vivid scales to the other fish, and realizing how overjoyed they became, he felt extremely happy as well. It is noticeable that happiness is impossible when it is not shared with others. Happiness is a big, repetitive cycle: you give to others, they give to you back, and so on. What you get back could be materials or money, but what's greater than all that is what you feel mentally. A deed as simple as donating used books to a local library has the capacity to remind oneself that he is the origin of all the smiles that will be brought to the faces of new readers. Offering happiness transforms the planet into a more meaningful world, making you a more meaningful individual. On the other hand, performing selfish acts puts one at a dead end, for then the ability to appreciate the values of the beauty of the universe can never be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill and Aristotle spent a lot of time defining and talking about happiness and how virtue can make one happy and also be a means to our end. According to Aristotle, virtue comes from practicing habit and good upbringing. In the society today, people think happiness is all about money and fame, but Aristotle believes that virtue is the one thing that can bring us happiness. According to Mill, he doesn’t agree that virtue is the end or rather the principal thing that makes us happy, rather Mill believes that pleasure is what brings happiness and also freedom from pain (Mill). He has a very different idea from Aristotle.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, we have to reach that emotional self-fulfillment to be entirely happy. In the end it isn’t material things or pleasure that push us to happiness but ourselves and our fulfillment. In Daniel Haybron’s Happiness and Its Discontents he jumps into the meaning of what happiness…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People place so much esteem on collecting material goods, whether it be clothes and shoes, the latest iPhone, or the nicest car. However, being happy does not depend solely on material goods. Many other factors including mental health and sense of self can also make a difference in one’s…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Against this doctrine, however, arises another class of objectors, who say that happiness, in any form, cannot be the rational purpose of human life and action; because, in the first place, it is unattainable: and they contemptuously ask, What right hast thou to be happy?” (EEW p.234) Nevertheless, he was willing to prove them wrong and continued to defend utilitarianism. Mill replies that it is an exaggeration to claim that humans cannot experience happiness. He insists that happiness is possible in those who have experienced a few pains in their life and this could be an attainable life for almost everyone if academic and social reputations change for the better to cultivate the proper values.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is desired by many as an end result, but Mill does not explain it with a clear and cogent…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain versus unhappiness which is pain and the absences of pleasure. Mill thinks pleasures and happiness are the same. If something brings you pleasure, then you are happy. Just as if you are happy something has brought you pleasure. Take for example food, it is only desired to stop and/or prevent hunger which brings happiness to the person starving.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientists connected electrodes to a man’s brain and with a click of a button; his dopamine receptors fired causing immense pleasure. The ethical conundrum of this experiment is debating whether the electrode man is happy or not. He was experiencing great amounts of low quality pleasure, but he did not have any fulfilment compared to high quality pleasures. Mill would argue that the electrode man was not achieving the good life because his experience was not fulfilling in the bigger picture of life. Other philosophers like John Bentham would say that he has attained the good life but it does seem like a shallow existence.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Stuart Mill is a very important and popular philosopher in the 19th century. He is one of the earliest advocates of Utilitarianism. He defines the theory of utilitarianism in his book, Utilitarianism. It focuses on the general good of individual pleasure. Mill tried to provide evidence for his theory of moral utilitarianism and refutes all the arguments against it in his book.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are certain choices that lead to happiness, and then there are others that lead to long lasting meaning. Many people agree that people’s…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mill then tells of the condition of happiness: happiness is not a continuous state of pleasure, but rather “the occasional brilliant flash if enjoyment” (12) because if happiness is a continuous state, it would most definitely be unattainable. He later addresses that humans can do without happiness, but it is unnecessary unless doing so is an action of self-sacrifice that is intended towards promoting happiness. This shows that happiness is inherent and…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill stated that “those only are happy who have have their minds fixed on some object other than their own happiness” (Mill). He presumes that people will find happiness, when…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative moral approach to ethics that tries to maximise the pleasure and minimises the amount of pain in given a situation. John Stuart Mill analysis the principle of Utility, Utility meaning ‘happiness’. Mill often thought it was important that in any given situation that happiness is supposed to continue to be uplifted (Mill, 1864 p.9). Mill examines, that happiness is the ultimate end in which every human lives their life to, and so anything has to be a means for that end to happen (Mill, 1864 p.52). In linguistic terms, it can be described as a “’theory of usefulness’”…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Utilitarianism,” John Stuart Mill argues that consequences of an action are all that really matter. Defining utilitarianism at its core, is a theory holding that the moral rightness and/or wrongness of an action depends entirely on the consequences of that action. Thereby agreeing that an action or decision is considered good if it generates happiness and bad if it generates the reverse. In his ethical approach, Mill suggests that the measure of success and happiness depends on how many people and how much happiness was developed as a result of that action, or the “greatest happiness principle.” This principle, Mill declares, “holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays