John Stuart Mill In Pursuit Of Happiness

Improved Essays
Even though The Declaration of Independence says we must pursue our own happiness, I say we shouldn’t because, as John Stuart says “Those only are happy who have their minds fixed on some object other than their own happiness; Aiming thus at something else, they find happiness by the way.”

Darrin M. McMahon states in his article in In Pursuit of Unhappiness that happiness is more than pleasure and good things.(11) It is morally to dwell on your own happiness is sure to make you unhappy. In his article, Mill claims that you should be more productive and do things that matter.
Mill develops his argument by writing those only are happy who have their minds focused on some object other than their own happiness if you ask yourself if whether you are happy, that’s when you cease to be. The purpose of Mill’s essay is to persuade us not to look for happiness, in order to be happy. His intended audience is probably young well educated adults. Mills says “Aiming thus at something else, they find happiness by the way” (12). We shouldn’t spend our time dwelling on finding our own happiness. By having our minds so focused on
…show more content…
We shouldn’t stress about finding, looking, or pursuing happiness. It should come to us, as we live our lives and do things with others around us. As we do things, as we talk to others and make memories is when we will find our true happiness. It will come along as you go through your days, happy moments will come. Some might argue that we must be focused if we are happy or not because in McMahon’s article he states “The right laid out in our nation’s Declaration of Independence- to pursue happiness to our hearts’ content-” (section 2). However, Mills way of happiness may not work for everyone. In summary, everyone has their own way of finding happiness therefore his argument is incorrect..
This is important because we all find happiness on our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In his book, Mill speaks of many clarifications and objections to his own principle as a way to disregard critics of utilitarianism. Because he is utilitarian, one of the most important clarifications of his idea of happiness that he offers is that it does not matter if one person is unhappy. What matters the most to Mill is that a greater number of are collectively happy. Therefore, the unhappy person would have to sacrifice their own happiness so everyone else can achieve it. Mill also believes that there is no such thing as true happiness because happiness cannot be achieved without a little pain.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, how are you happy without knowing you are happy? If the pursuit of happiness is not real then what do you do with your life? Everyone who thought happiness was a good thing, but it only betrayed you. Why are people searching for the meaning of happiness it is like asking what is the meaning of life, but there is no answer, so what is the point of living? Also when you accept your happiness then what do you do now doesn’t that defeat the purpose of living and you would just be satisfied with…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why should he solely be accountable for the well-being of others? Mill explains that there is a natural duty of humans to help each other and the fear of displeasing God, but there is still necessarily no clear evidence that we must strive for aggregate happiness to achieve those goals. Even so, if George is to calculate each alternative, as a proper utilitarian, and weigh the net happiness of each action then he has the ability to place the value of his own happiness above other’s. Therefore, if George values his moral integrity and happiness above that of his family and the supposed passionate chemist, he has the complete right to not accept the job and still please the utilitarian…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The challenge with Mill’s view was the appeal to standards other than happiness in order to differentiate between different kinds of happiness and that if there is another value besides happiness, then he abandons the idea that happiness is the only good thing. In this theory, happiness seems to be over-socialized and is seen to direct humans into obeying a system of rules. This idea of following rules is not an adequate basis of achieving the value of happiness in life. It takes more than just rules to achieve a certain target or desire and much more in creating a human life that is worthy a living. A better definition would be one that explains how we should spend our time working for the good of all of us and that anything we do that affects privately is only justified by making us better or improving our morale to continue…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life, according to David Swenson, is not life unless it is happy. In order to achieve happiness, one’s life must be submerged with a sense of meaning, reason, and worth, thus happiness must be justified. To obtain a meaning to life, one must contribute to life to progress their talents which will, in turn, help themselves and others. But more importantly, Swenson speculates that the purpose of one’s life is to develop an instinctive view of life to achieve happiness. Swenson explains the difficulties with the idea of happiness which he believes are derived from the fixation on the material and the external world.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mond addresses to the fact that universal happiness keeps the wheels steadily turning, beauty and truth cannot as well as the belief that great is truth, but still greater, from a practical point of view, is silence about truth. These two ideas show that the sacrifice made for happiness is ignorance. The society is conditioned into believing an alternative truth rather than historical or factual truth, in order to maintain this constant state of happiness. It states that truth cannot keep the wheel turning, perhaps because if people knew the truth, then there would be room for debate due to conflicting opinions and interpretation. Hence the easiest way to suppress the people is to hide the truth and replace it with the state's own ideas of how a society should be run.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So we can only consider that suffering creates the meaning of some existential situations in some point of human life, not the meaning of human’s life as a whole. Overall, happiness is the meaning of life because we all want happiness as the final goal for our life. Although there are some people who might think about "the meaning of life" in different ways, as long as human beings are still continuously seeking happiness in every moment of their existence, happiness is still the main factor that makes human life…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Once make them so, and they are immediately felt to be insufficient. They will not bear a scrutinizing examination. Ask yourself whether you are happy, and you cease to be so.” John S. Mill is saying that when we ask ourselves we might start to leave some room for doubt and question our happiness. He also tells us what the solution is to our doubt on whether we are happy or not, “The only chance is to treat, not happiness, but some end external to it, as the purpose of life.” Mills argument supports itself to be true when finding happiness because he gives a solution to each of the arguments he makes, so if you have disillusioned yourself, follow Mills methods to be…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is based on the Utilitarian principle that one should act towards the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This promotes happiness and pleasure while condemning anything that causes pain. Mill believes that the purpose for any person’s actions is to experience pleasure or to avoid pain. Though this ultimate telos for happiness may seem like a good system, there are flaws that do not coincide with human nature. One issue with this theory is that it does not take into consideration that different people have different preferences and ideas of what is pleasurable.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case, there is a certain aspect of Kantian duty that is seen. Lennon attempts to make his philosophy universal through reason by portraying a peaceful world, without one’s initial experience, a priori. By eliminating these a posteriori ideas, one would obtain happiness and unity that benefit everyone, which is the greatest good for the greatest number of people. In this aspect, Lennon’s song is inspired by Mill’s philosophy. Lennon believes that the greatest happiness requires challenging the constraints, such as social norms and organizations.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays