Importance Of Freedom Of Speech In John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

Superior Essays
Canada is widely known and thought of as being a democratic county where freedom of speech is naturally given to everyone. However, during situations of opposing views and national conflicts, a very common question rises – are Canadian citizens actually free to speak without limitations?

In On Liberty, John Stuart Mill explores the limitations and regulations on freedom of speech and formulates a theory that the intervention of government would result in degeneration of freedom of speech for citizens. However, in the situation in the episode of ‘The Agenda’, his theory gets challenged due to its ineffectiveness. The episode tackles a continuing political issue of freedom of speech and the limitations following it. The matter begins with a particular
…show more content…
Currently, the only restrictions seem to be about harming other members of society. However, another restriction for freedom of speech in Canada should also include the necessity for all opinions and beliefs to be discussed and expressed on equal platforms regarding important issues. This would also decrease the amount people get offended by since they would be given an equal opportunity to explain their perspective as well. Furthermore, similar to Mill’s thoughts, by enabling society to express all opinions for opposing sides, the argument can be more thoroughly examined and discussed. This enables the population to critically analyze both sides of the argument in order to arrive at a well-informed and practical opinion. As Mill states in his novel, the process of defending personal belief strengthens the confidence associated with the claim (2002, pp.16). He also explains by exploring different opinions on a particular topic, it allows people to obtain a holistic view on the issue and widen their thoughts to understand other opinions and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    First draft: Rosenblatt Summary and Response In “We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid, and Dead” Roger Rosenblatt discusses the views of freedom of speech. He uses examples to show different people’s views on freedom of speech. He also adds his own opinion throughout the article. I may or may not agree on some of the views.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Freedom of expression deals with the thought that the people of the community should make up their own mind and express their beliefs wherever they want including in public. Regarding this issue, the perspectives by Jeremy Waldron and Catherine MacKinnon that are put forth, are both effective explanations for their contemporary take. In this essay, I will argue that MacKinnon’s’ argument is the correct position, over Waldron’s. I believe it is the more powerful argument because of her exploration of the collision between equality and law, her references to real-world examples such as sexual and racial harassment, and the acknowledgment of the oppressed voices’ being overshadowed.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Diefenbaker and the Canadian Bill of Rights John Diefenbaker was the thirteenth Prime minister of Canada. He was elected in 1957, forming the Progressive Conservative Government, and from the beginning of his campaign, he made it a promise that he would create a Bill of Rights for Canada. He was a very progressive Prime Minister who believed in equality and fairness, “Diefenbaker brought diversity into government- he appointed the first woman to a cabinet post and the first Aboriginal person to the Senate.” (Canadian Decades 1960, p. 20) Citizens of Canada appreciated his dedication, and his commitment both to the Bill of Rights and to Canada deserves recognition. There was reasons that Canada needed a Bill of Rights.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I. INTRODUCTION Freedom of expression is one of Canada’s fundamental freedoms, as laid out by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This freedom is highly valued in most democratic countries and as such is very highly protected. The Ontario Human Right Code grants everyone freedom from discrimination on multiple different grounds. Recently, conflicts have occurred between these two rights when the freedom of expression is used to discriminate against a person or group of persons. Often, these groups are discriminated against very harshly.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Fish Free Speech

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Questioning is risky. It requires both the risk of questioning incorrectly, and the risk of undermining the oft-accepted beliefs of an authority. In the face of loftily written texts by distinguished academics, agreeing with the text at face value seems the easiest option. The fear of overstepping and inaccurately rendering the author’s opinion moot outweighs the reward of carefully finding the flaws in the text and learning more about reading critically. The reader of Stanley Fish’s “There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech, and It’s a Good Thing, Too” may experience a similar feeling.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech is something that has been long instilled in the minds of Americans. Some seem to suppose they have complete freedom of that right, however, there are rules and restrictions. Many are not aware of these limitations and are not aware of just how many our world possesses. Some countries have more restrictions than others, but overall there are some phrases that are against the law to use, for example, shouting “fire” in a theater full of people (Turley 160).…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Magna Carta was an influential, historical document that impacted society in several ways. It was signed by the British King John. The King signed it, unaware of all rights he was giving up. The Magna Carta was basically 63 grievances of the noblemen in Britain. The Magna Carta was just as impactful now as it was then.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America, one of the things that is taken for granted every day is an individual’s right to free speech. In the American Civil Liberties Union’s documentary entitled “The ACLU Freedom Files: Dissent” this freedom and its oppression is discussed. Often, Americans will claim that they can say whatever they want, because of “free speech”, but as this documentary shows oftentimes that is not the case. Peaceful protestors are often harassed, arrested, and even sometimes harmed by the police. One protest that resulted in the arrest of more than 1800 citizens occurred in New York City, during the Republican Convention.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having Free Speech is the basic right that Americans have, it is the ability to speaks one’s mind and ideas. Theres are many benefits to having the ability to project ideas without censorship. Caleb Yong author of “Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?” argues that the liberal justice has a special protection against the restriction of speech and expression, he calls it “Free Speech Principle” where it includes its “sensitivity to the distinction between coverage and protection (Yong)” that the speech should be monitored. Hate speech is too broad to single out the negative effect that it can have in any group. The main concept of this article includes the four categories that hate speech can be set in.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The freedom to speech is very important to many Americans. However, many wonder if some speech should be prohibited especially while online. This is because it is harming, slandering, or hateful. The best way to evaluate this issue is through Deontology. This is because every American has a right to free speech, according to the constitution, they also have duties and consequences that come with being able to say whatever they want.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abel Fields Free Speech

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today I’m here to express my views on the U.S. vs. Fields a very distinct and intriguing case that involves the topic of free speech. First we have the defendant Abel Fields who was convicted under the Stolen Valor Act, after Mr. Fields portrayed himself claiming that he had “military experience” claiming he had a Purple Heart, also the Medal of Honor, Navy Cross, and even the Air force cross. This made him believe that it gave him the right to speak with authority on the issues but these claims were false. Abel Fields appealed his decision to the court, stating that he viewed the Stolen Valor Act as unconstitutional and believes that his right to the first amendment was being violated. Field’s prosecutors argue that even though Mr. Fields…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history philosophers have argued over every topic one could imagine however one of the most explored topics is the rights of citizens. What must those who enter a society under their free will give up to be an active member? Is the government allowed to ask you to give up some of your rights for the betterment of society? Questions such as these and countless more have been answered and debated by philosophers for years. Some of the most prominent arguments have been made by John Stuart Mill and John Locke.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    way in which it should be expressed so as not infringe on the liberty of the minority groups. Moreover, true as it may be that most constitutions defend the freedom of speech, it is also true that these constitutions place limits on how freely one can express themselves because of the harm and offense that unlimited speech can cause. For example, the first amendment of the USA’s constitution protects freedom of speech and yet there exist laws regarding libel, obscenity, national security, access to government information, and regulation of electronic mass communications. John Stuart Mill, despite being one of the greatest defenders of free speech suggested that “a struggle is always in conflict with the demands of the authority and liberty,”…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill contends that opinions should not be expressed if this is done to cause mischief and that they are permissible to be expressed if they do not. He argues that it is justifiable that a man expresses a negative opinion towards the ownership of private property or states that merchants are the reason for poverty (Mill 52). Although controversial in nature, such opinions are not harming anyone and for this reason, should have the ability to circulate. However, the opinion is only justifiable in certain instances where the context of the situation affirms it is not inflicting harm on another individual or a group (Mill 16). To illustrate this point, Mill refers to a scenario in which the same opinion is expressed by a group of people which could lead to dangerous circumstances (e.g. mob outside of corn-dealers house).…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should there be a limit for individual expression or guidelines to public opinions? Freedom of speech has been a controversial topic for many years, it was created when democracy was established to protect the people and individual rights. Since then it has become more of an issue in modern society due to the constant action of restriction on everyday speech. It has been argued that limiting the right to express a person’s opinion could eventually cause more harm than good. Other people might disagree and argue that a set of limitations could be a positive action to eliminate the negative and violent outcomes freedom of speech creates.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays