John Stuart Mill Euthanasia

Great Essays
In understanding the world around us, it is important to take a stance on specific ideas with firm ideas and insights. In order to do this, however, one may find it helpful to be firmly grounded in a specific in a specific ethical framework to best dissect and understand a specific case in humanity. I have chosen to delve into the topic of euthanasia in relation and correspondence to the moral decision-making system of utilitarianism.
To fully understand the entwinement of these two ideas, the information will be split up into two defined sections. The first will include an overall history of utilitarianism, its roots in the ideologies of Jeremy Bentham, and its refinement in the hands of John Stuart Mill. The second section will take an in-depth look at the overall idea of euthanasia, a history of the laws that have defined euthanasia, specific cases of euthanasia, and how the decision-making system of utilitarianism can be applied to these.
Utilitarianism
Modern day utilitarianism continues in its roots of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill principles and practices. Becoming fully composed in the 19th century, the general guide of this theory is that the morally correct decisions should
…show more content…
Though some modern scholars may not fully agree with all of the core principles of classical utilitarianism, it has had a large part in developing the field of philosophy and ethics. Classical utilitarianism consists of the principles of measuring morality on the pleasure of individuals and collective society, impartiality and agent-neutrality, Bentham’s calculus of pain versus pleasure compensation, and the modified views of Mills including quantitative pleasure differentiation and long-term versus short-term pleasure gauging. This moral decision-making system of utilitarianism will be useful in understanding the role of euthanasia in our world today and its ethical

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Alternatives to euthanasia can prevent putting too much power in other hands, and eliminate consequences in the future; therefore, euthanasia should not be legalized. Through the legalization of Euthanasia we will eventually enter a “slippery slope”. One of the biggest concerns with euthanasia is when to cross the line at who can receive euthanasia. As euthanasia progresses more laws and rules are being set to allow more people to receive euthanasia.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For James Rachels, as Barcalow says on page 252 of MP, “letting someone die is often no better from a moral point of view than killing someone.” Rachels challenges the view that killing someone, that is, via active euthanasia is far worse than letting someone die, that is, via passive euthanasia. Rachels thinks that sometimes even letting someone die can be far more worse than just outright killing them. To demonstrate his argument, Rachels gives a thought-experiment addressing this issue.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in the case of physician-assisted suicide, there are no apparent social consequences for the actions of the patient. In Dr. Quill’s account, Diane’s decision to end her suffering did not contribute to any negative social consequences. As Arras demonstrates in the case above, there are crucial flaws with adopting an entirely rights-based society. Nevertheless, a rights-based approach provides a unique perspective in favor of physician-assisted death. The Utilitarian…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although this reference provides a substantial framework for study, it lacks the in-depth comparisons between the modern era approach to euthanasia and the historical past before the 1800?s. It also lacks discussion on the cultural pressures not to document the benefits…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Euthanasia is the intended killing of another person with the intention of ending an individuals suffering with their request. Euthanasia has three different decisions: Voluntary, Non-Voluntary, and Involuntary. Each of these decisions either have active or passive causes of death. Physician assisted suicide is when a physician provides the patient with the substance and/or tells them how to end their life with it. Along with giving them the substance, they are aware that the patient may commit suicide.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the sake of time, I will consider PAS and euthanasia as essentially the same practice. Thus these terms will be used interchangeably, except in citations, which will always use the term stated by the source. I will also avoid the moral or religious arguments against these practices, not because they are invalid, but because the inclusion of such arguments would lengthen this speech beyond the imposed limits. Instead I will argue that legalizing euthanasia, even if initially for a good purpose, leads to severe ethical consequences. These consequences can be summarized as the danger to doctors, the danger to patients, and the danger to…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia In Australia

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The pro-euthanasia movement maintains that our rights include determining the time and manner of our own death. Given the fact that people die unexpectedly every day of both natural and accidental causes, this philosophy is patently absurd. If, however, one simply considers the so-called right to choose death when suffering is too great, then we have to ask the question of what kind of suffering qualifies. In contrast, people who disagree to allow euthanasia say that if the choice of euthanasia is considered as good as a decision to receive care, many people will feel guilty for not choosing death.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assisted suicide or euthanasia has been receiving more attention since the 1990’s, due to Dr. Jack Kevorkian, who assisted in the suicide of over one hundred terminal patients. He was put on trial and charged with second-degree murder, thus state governments passed multiple laws against assisted suicide. The practice of permitting the death of a terminally ill or hopelessly sick individual for a painless form of mercy has been deemed illegal in thirty-four states. Due to the attention, this topic has received, controversy has grown as people are arguing on both sides of the spectrum, for and against euthanasia. In the essay, Individuals Should Have a Legal Right to Choose Death by Thomas A. Bowden, a legal analyst at the Ayn Rand Institute, argues for the legality of assisted suicide with support in the God-given rights of life.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Controversies have been revolving around the reckless outcomes in the legality of euthanasia. Also known as mercy killing, euthanasia is the implementation of dismissing a life with a terminal illness or intolerable suffering. In the levels of morality and professionalism, it is ludicrous to assist termination of one’s life, especially in a passive or involuntary way. Legalization of euthanasia has proven higher levels of convictions in non-voluntary euthanasia. Thus, the United States as well as many other countries around the world, have developed a negative reputation from controversial cases surrounding assisted suicides.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to talk about the topic of euthanasia. I will argue that active euthanasia is morally permissible in the case of a terminally ill patient who is going through unbearable amounts of pain. Furthermore, the focus of this paper will only be on this type of euthanasia; active euthanasia. However, in the first part of my essay I will not only define what active euthanasia is but I will explain how it differs from other types of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There has been a lot of debate over whether or not physician assisted suicide or PSA/E is morally permissible. This paper will cover both physician assisted suicide and euthanasia, which has not normally been argued in one discussion. This paper will argue that PSA/E is morally permissible and will include the most prominent objections also. Topics covered will include quality of life and individual rights, and the correct use of physician assisted-suicide. The utilitarian argument of less suffering and comparing the euthanization of animals to the euthanization of humans will also be discussed.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will contend that Brock’s argument in favor of the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is sound and that Brock offers persuasive responses to the objection that (A) VAE is an act which involves the deliberate killing of an innocent person and (B) the deliberate killing of an innocent person is always morally wrong. To achieve this, I will begin by summarizing Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE. Then, I will synthesize the objection to Brock’s argument and Brock’s subsequent responses. Finally, I will describe why I find Brock’s responses persuasive. Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE can be constructed as follows: (1) VAE is supported by the “values of patient well-being…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following three arguments will subsequently be anaylzed in the philosophical context of moral theories put forth by Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill. The first argument in favour of permitting euthanasia is that when an individual is suffering from a terminal disease or unbearable pain, it it seen as morally just to allow them to terminate their life, rather than forcing them to continue suffering. Euthanasia in this scenario is perceived as a humanitarian solution through…

    • 1961 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, involves a person in extreme suffering, and wishing to deliberately end their life with the help of another person. Euthanasia is illegal in a majority of countries. These countries feel that it should never be ok for someone to help another person kill themselves regardless of the circumstances and even class it as manslaughter or murder (Choices, 2015). A utilitarian has many views on the subject and why it is acceptable and why it is not. Throughout this assignment, I will go into further detail of a utilitarian’s view on euthanasia and whether or not they think it is acceptable.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays