John Stuart Mill Essay

Improved Essays
John Stuart Mill’s advocates and supports that Utilitarianism is in fact a moral theory under what he calls the Greatest Happiness Principle. The term “utility,” in Mill’s opinion can be described in the Greatest Happiness principle. In the Greatest Happiness Principle, Mill’s elucidate that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill). His argument under this principle was that the equality of pleasure comes from an individual’s higher faculties. Thus, through happiness one is able to express higher faculties. The end of his argument ends with things that people should count towards their happiness. In addition, Mills also seeks to explain the stratifications of the different types of pleasure. I believe that we should embrace utilitarianism as a moral theory and furthermore as an ethic. However, I believe that Mill’s principle creates a moral problem. According to the Greatest Happiness Principle, actions are right in order to promote individual happiness. However, I do not fully agree with this part of the principle because there is a slight chance that an individual’s actions can promote unhappiness, in response …show more content…
One should not yearn to be a happy pig over being an unhappy human because the individual that is best capable to critic others pleasure eminence must have experienced the higher and the lower faculties. I agree with Mill’s conclusion on this part of the principle because an individual is able to compare satisfaction with happiness and pleasure. I assume the statement also implies that the more aware an individual is of their various choices, the more satisfaction they can receive. Furthermore, one should never desire a lower existence, but rather exercise one’s higher faculties and maintain

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    focus on his own personal happiness, or should one make the happiness of others his priority? What if the individual who endeavors never-ending euphoria is indeed the most broken inside? This concept was the chief issue in the autobiography of John Stuart Mill, a 19th century English philosopher. Mill's reasoning of just 'going with the flow' by concentrating less about personal happiness is unmistakably the most supreme path to increased satisfaction in anyone's lifestyle. Mill's principle…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bentham and Mill, although both firm believers in Utilitarianism, had somewhat different views when it came to decision making. Bentham uses a step by step process in his essay describing the thought process that one should have when determining the outcome of an action. Similar to Mill’s belief, if the outcome were to bring more happiness to the community as a whole than pain, than that decision is just. However, Mill believed that to make a proper and good decision required using the analyzing…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Utilitarianism,” John Stuart Mill argues that consequences of an action are all that really matter. Defining utilitarianism at its core, is a theory holding that the moral rightness and/or wrongness of an action depends entirely on the consequences of that action. Thereby agreeing that an action or decision is considered good if it generates happiness and bad if it generates the reverse. In his ethical approach, Mill suggests that the measure of success and happiness depends on how many people…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays