John Scopes Trial Analysis

In 1925, the Scopes Trial occurred because John Scopes, a high school teacher, was accused of breaking Tennessee’s law against the teaching of evolution in public schools. The prosecution welcomed William Jennings Bryan to take part in the trial, while the defense chose Clarence Darrow on their team. Bryan was a firm religious fundamentalist, however encouraged the indictment to battle its fight on sacred grounds. Bryan trusted that groups were legitimized in setting educational principles upheld in schools. Be that as it may, he was overruled by his peers who argued science and religion. Bryan goofed amid the trial by permitting Darrow to call him as a specialist witness on the Bible. Nonetheless, Darrow bombarded Bryan with difficult questions on his absolute acknowledgment of a few Bible's stories from the formation of Eve from Adam's rib to the gulping of …show more content…
The traditionalists might feel like they lost even though they won the trial because of how Scopes conviction was later overturned on a technicality due to the excessive fine. The Scopes Trial itself likewise played up the contrasts amongst traditionalism and urban modernism. Urban daily paper and radio columnists rushed to Dayton to cover the trial. The media strongly agreed with the more present day thoughts and in this way engendered the possibility that there was a crucial contrast amongst urban modernism and traditionalism. John Scopes was a devotee to urban modernism, but he needed to lecture on evolution in his high school class since the starting of the school year. Scopes, as indicated by eyewitnesses, stayed calm all through the trial. He just talked toward the end when he expressed concluding comments. Scopes never pronounced that he did not have confidence in God, he expressed that students should be taught different creation theories.