John Rawl's Justice Of Fairness And Civil Disobedience

Through the many philosophers and theories, I will be examining a specific moral theory, theory of justice, and question the idea on civil disobedience. The moral theory of utilitarianism and how it reflects on John Rawl’s “justice of fairness” with the help of his veil of ignorance experiment will be the main discussion topic. I will be arguing and stating my thoughts towards Rawl’s justice of fairness and the civil disobedience and how it shows weakness’s and strengths, but that I am also for utilitarianism. Through utilitarianism, the justice of fairness, and civil disobedience, we will discover how the strengths and weakness’s of fairness and equality have on society throughout life.
Utilitarianism is the “theory that the right action …show more content…
Yes, segregation was a huge milestone and success with the help of protestors and non-violent force, but not always are we lucky to end with positive outcomes. Another negative aspect on my argument could be that not all philosophers see moral in this way. In the book, “If the end doesn’t justify the means, there is nothing else that could!” (Lawhead, 461) This is stating that many people have different feelings against moral duties and consequences and that maybe just maybe we will never know the true correct answer. However, I feel that my argument or thoughts on the civil disobedience may not always be in our favor, but it sure does beat violence any day for me. Violence is never the answer as told by millions, and I have to strongly enforce that with non-violent force, people are more likely to make a strong statement or more likely to find ways to show their moral beliefs on what needs to be fair in our society. I personally feel my views on Rawl’s justice theory and civil disobedience can’t compare with violence, and I strongly urge the view of Rawls point along with utilitarianism to be equal when justifying the citizen’s fairness in