John Rawls' has two particular theories for an ethical decision making process. One being "that before a decision is made, decision makers figuratively pass through a veil of ignorance that strips away their rank, power, and status" (Guth & Marsh, 2012, p. 179). Meaning that they must examine a situation objectively and through a lens that covers all points of view, which will help them to become "a member of one of the affected publics instead of the decision maker" (Guth & Marsh, 2012, p. 179). The second of these theories is to correct social injustice, in that, "the most disadvantaged publics in a situation should receive the most consideration" (Guth & Marsh, 2012, p. 179).
When it comes to these idea and a for-profit businesses, they
When it comes to these idea and a for-profit businesses, they