John Mill's Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
The key features of the argument on Utilitarianism developed by John Mill focus on his support for valuing utilitarian as a moral theory. He first defines what he believes utilitarian means in which he states: “Actions are right in proportion, as they tend to promote happiness, wrong, as they tend to promote the reverse of happiness (Mills, 90).” John Mill believes that what is considered to be moral can neither be a right or wrong action. In order to determine whether an action is right or wrong it would depend on the overall non-moral good that was to be produced in the consequence of that action. Mills utilitarian moral theory focused on maximizing general happiness by analyzing the greatest good for the greatest number. He believed that

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    He also believes that things do not come down not right and wrong, they are simply a product of our social system and they must occur if it is the will of that system. In addition, I have some problems with Mill’s utilitarianism because it seems to have some open ends as I discussed before. For example, let’s use a current issue, immigration. With Donald Trump winning the presidential election, the issue of immigration is on everyone 's minds. According to utilitarianism; It would be moral to deport 30,000 people if 30,001 people were in favor of it.…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Stewart Mill and Immanuel Kant are two of the most influential philosophers in history. Their philosophies of utilitarianism and deontology, respectively, have different fundamental values and priorities. The fundamental principle of utilitarianism is that actions are morally correct in proportion to how much happiness they create, henceforth all people should strive to promote happiness and pleasure. Happiness, Mill states, is the ultimate objective of all human actions; one shall prefer those actions which yield the most happiness.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believes the best action is the one that brings happiness to the most people. Kant believes that to perform an action it needs to be morally right and not just the most beneficial to the majority of people. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism is one that is strongly based upon the idea that the correct action is one that we deem to bring the most happiness to people. When talking about actions, Mill states, “It can only be determined…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is the concept illustrated by John Stuart Mill as the maximization of human happiness. (He relates utility to the “greatest happiness principle,” a concept by philosopher Jeremy Bentham.) Mill describes happiness as “pleasure and the absence of pain.” Something of extrinsic value has worth only because of the value or benefits it brings to something else; something of intrinsic value has worth because of the value it possesses even while alone.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill defines utilitarianism as “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness,” (484) He then begins to explain that happiness is the absence of pain, and pain is the absence of pleasure. He refers to utilitarianism as the Greatest Happiness Principle. Many people that disagreed with Mill’s definition of utilitarianism insulted his work by stating it as a “doctrine worthy only of swine,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this attack by stating “...for if the sources of pleasure were precisely the same to human beings and to swine, the rule of which is good enough for the one would be good enough for the other,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this insult by comparing human…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Mill Utilitarianism

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mill o One part of James Mill’s utilitarianism is stated as, “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (151). o If one looks at this part of the theory, then James Mill’s view on the illegality more than likely would be that it is morally unsound to prevent patients from getting what they need because the product makes them happy. o He would say the action of preventing the product to be legally obtained is not right because as stated, actions are right when they produce happiness, not the opposite. o In addition to the actions are right perspective, James Mill also said, “Pleasure, and freedom from pain, are the only things desirable as ends” (151).…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mill expresses the specifics of his views in his literary work titled Utilitarianism. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism measures the goodness of actions…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In efforts to find summum bonum or the ultimate good, philosophers during the 20th century began to investigate ethical issues, and tried to create their own versions of an ideal moral code. During this time, John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer base their ethical beliefs in the philosophy of utilitarianism. Both Mill’s essay Utilitarianism and Singer’s work Famine, Affluence and Morality explore the pursuit of happiness and its relation to moral philosophy. The doctrine of utilitarianism emphasizes the consequences of one’s actions as they add to the sum total of happiness.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In regard to ideas about happiness, Mill introduces a concept he came up with which he calls the Greatest Happiness Principle. Of his principle, Mill says, “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness,” (Utilitarianism, pg. 229). This principle obviously aligns with his utilitarian beliefs because he would suggest using to gauge how people feel about certain actions and if the largest number of people were not happy about these actions then they would have to be undone for not following the premise of utilitarianism. In his book, Mill speaks of many clarifications and objections to his own principle as a way to disregard critics of utilitarianism. Because he is utilitarian, one of the most important clarifications of his idea of happiness that he offers is that it does not matter if one person is unhappy.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are considered founders of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory where moral rightness is measured by what brings the most happiness to the most people. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism because it is based on whether an action is morally justified by its consequences. Bentham and Mill differ in that Bentham reasoned that pleasure was measurable using hedons, units of pleasure, where actions with the highest score were the best action.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill believes that ethics are measured based on the consequences of individual deeds and also in consequentialism, or utilitarianism, which is the doctrine that decides what actions are right and if they are useful or for the benefit of a majority. Utilitarianism never really relies on ill-defined instinct or intellectual principles, but it allows philosophers as well as psychologists to determine what makes people happy and which policies promote the social “good”. In order for Utilitarianism to work appropriately, the interests of each individual is required and each individual 's interest must be thought of equally. Mill uses the “Quantity/Quality” distinction to be able to tell which pleasure is most desired. For example, Qualitative pleasure in a small amount are more important than a Quantitative pleasure in a larger amount and a small qualitative issue is more important than a large quantitative issue.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In ethics there are hundreds of theories that try to define morality. Utilitarianism is one of these theories that seems to simply be that if one is being moral, their decisions will create the greatest amount of happiness for everyone (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). This theory has been defended by many, including Jeremey Bentham, who popularized quantitative utilitarianism, and John Stuart Mill, who believed that utilitarianism was actually qualitative (Wilkens, 2011). While utilitarianism as a whole can seem clear-cut, John Stuart Mill’s theory of qualitative utilitarianism has many ethical problems, and is too simple to accurately address every moral decision. Utilitarianism is a fairly popular viewpoint when it comes to morality because it…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays