John Mill Freedom

Improved Essays
The main theme of the on liberty book by John Mill’s is individual and what are the rights of individuals to his liberty. Media in our society creates stereotypes and violent as we saw in the video which we saw in class (The Agenda with Mark Steyn and Islamophobia : America Alone) it hurts and harm people more than it help them. In my essay I will talk about what is limitation and free speeches from John Mill’s opinion, how would Mill respond to the speech issue in this case.

Mill in on liberty explained why the freedom of discussion is very important and when this freedom discussion should be limited, in on liberty Mill’s gave us some reasons. Freedom of discussion was accepted even in Mill’s time period , he thought
…show more content…
Firstly, that example is similar to the one we took in class when the professor asked us is the truth always right and he also gave us a scenario of a person who is going crazy and he asked another person if he had a knife, in that case if the person had a knife should not tell the guy that he has a knife because he could of kill himself. The scenario here is almost the same idea so we will imagine that a majority which is sharing a certain point of view trying to be silence the minority who disagree. And the majority’s points of view are wrong, and the minority’s points of view are right. In that case Mill’s argues that there is disastrous to silence the minority, disastrous for the majority and that is because there is no means of liberation its belief in wrong way. However the minority is free for expressing their doubts about the majority point of view, then there is a chance that the majority will be brought to see the wrong of their point of …show more content…
That case like what happened in the video which we saw in class “The Agenda with Mark Steyn and Islamophobia : America Alone” as Mark Steyn wrote in his book America Alone, In that book Steyn argued that Europe, and Western post-Christian civilization, are experiencing a civilization exhaustion which led to particular demographic crisis. This demographic crisis, contended Steyn, to expose the ambitions of an increasingly vocal and increasingly violent Islamic minority in Europe, which was kind of violent and harmful to the Muslim people. Mill’s had another argument in chapter 2 which is that the majorities, the minorities or anyone else they can never say that their beliefs are right and completely true, they always have to but in mind they mind be wrong or their beliefs is not completely right which means that half of their beliefs are right and the other part are wrong and these cases of free discussion are very

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The first amendment guarantees the right to speech and assembly. In an article titled “The Indispensable Opposition,” Walter Lippmann argues that freedom is a necessity to society and it can not function properly without that freedom. Lippmann uses a blunt tone as well as a dramatic pause, strong diction, and a reference from a historical philosopher in attempts to show that with political freedom comes toleration. The blunt tone in lines 1-20 candidly points out the cold hard facts that most men will not accept a different opinion that is not similar to theirs.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ends don’t always justify the means. Mill also believes in free will which has its issues. People can’t be trusted, because if people were given complete freedom to decide how and when to act in attaining greater good, they would all be selfish. People would act on selfish reasons and justify their actions as if they were for the greater good.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    You may find my actions immoral or unjust. But attempting to restrict my freedoms – in ways that you would not restrict your own- leads only to injustice” (Bloomberg 105). These powerful words by Bloomberg show us that everyone has the right to speak their mind and nobody is capable of taking that away from us. Yes the ideas going through someone’s head can be misleading, not only to a person, but to a whole group – or in some cases a community. That is why we as humans have a tendency of stopping each other, by any means necessary, so that we don’t have to have to hear the words or ideas that annoy us or make us feel uncomfortable; yet without having to worry about those restrictions, we can come up with the most beautiful discoveries.…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Fahrenheit 451, society is mainly consisted of technology consumed, zombie-like citizens that are held authority by a cruel, mind-controlling government. Our American culture experiences the opposite of this idea; members are lively and are held under democracy, and have a sense of freedom and privilege. Fahrenheit 451’s culture displays mechanical obsession that causes tyrannical-like control, while current American society uses technology for the better and has freedom of speech. Fahrenheit 451 contains characters who are brain-dead from television and other forms of technology.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a civilize society people have the right to freedom of speech and expression. Freedom of speech allow people to communicate their thoughts in an educated manner. This freedom creates an instructive environment, where people can express their opinion and exchange ideas. However, the liberty to articulate ideas can produce social tension. In “Martin’s Letter From Birmingham Jail,”Martin Luther King says, “One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws,”(King 4).…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill saw the problem with modern society as resulting from the power of both the tyranny of the majority but also the tyranny of public opinion. He believed that public opinion had grown too strong to the point where “At present individuals are lost in the crowd. In politics it is almost a triviality to say that public opinion now rules the world.” (On Liberty, chapter III). The “lost in the crowd” metaphor is a powerful one that illustrates Mill’s view.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On 1st Amendment

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Rachael Jolley, believes that free speech is crucial for change. Think about a time from the past – women not being allowed the vote” (Josie Timms). This article explains just how much we need the freedom of speech in order to change because, it tells us how Americans step up and made a change. With Freedom of speech, people are allowed to step up and make an impact. “But we should feel comfortable being in a room with people who disagree with us as otherwise nothing will change” (Josie Timms).…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today, America is a place where freedom of speech, liberty and rights are all granted by laws; however, this was not always the case. Back in 1776, when the American revolution was beginning, independence and a democratic society were non existent. In the passage, “ Thinking Through the Past”, by John Hollitz, the main idea is focused on different events and laws that caused the American revolution. Several primary sources are displayed throughout the passage that help with the upbringing of the revolution. Britain was taking away many of the citizen’s rights and they finally wanted to be free.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, there is one of several examples that shows this is not always true. Let’s say for example, that a group of people come to your house asking where your mother is because they want to kill her. Now if one were to act in accordance to Mill’s theory…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mills criticism of nussbaum Nussbaum develops a theory based on capabilities to achieve justice for all men and women. The capabilities she selects are stemmed from the issues she saw with the discrimination and the mistreatment of women all around the world. Women are falling behind men politically, socially and economically all around the world. They are unable to achieve the same level of equality and freedom that men have in a society that looks to tradition to justify women’s unequal treatment (pg 29). Mill would look at the capabilities she compiled and would agree that they are necessary to live a fulfilled human life and would agree that it should be the center of public policy.…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    He states, “In all such cases there should be personal freedom, legal and social, to do the action and stand the consequences” (Mill, 64). But, in defining freedom, as expressed earlier,…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Rousseau Analysis

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill the liberal and Jean-Jacques Rousseau the republican, are two political philosophers whom focussed on the integration of political liberty with the relationship found between that of the individual, society and the state by the means of power or authority. Both of these political thinkers formed their arguments in their writings, namely; On Liberty (1859) by Mill, and The Social Contract (1913) by Rousseau. On a more specific scale, their views differed in much contrast, whereby Rousseau claims that people and individuals of society may only acquire the entity of freedom through a transitioning process from the natural state to the civil state, whereby they would have to conform to the general will as the common good. On the…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    English philosopher, political economist, and liberal John Stuart Mill published one of his most famous works in 1859: On Liberty. Mill explores the innate and given liberties of people, analyzing what is the extent in which society or government has valid reasons to exercise power over its people. He argues that the individual should not be under the jurisdiction of society or government if their actions are not harming anyone but themselves. The only time society or government should involve themselves and exert power over citizens is if the actions of the individual are harming others within the society.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The People vs. Larry Flynt Americans value their freedom, most especially their freedom of speech and how their Constitution protects such freedom. Speeches like hate speech, speech plus, symbolic speech, seditious speech and the like are part of their freedom of speech. For the purposes of this paper, the film to be discussed is The People vs. Larry Flynt. This paper will also discuss the interrelationship between media, identities, and politics depicted in the said movie. Brief Summary of the Film…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is out of the power of Mill’s ethical claim to capture whether or not the consequences of certain actions are to be acknowledged as good or bad. Solely centralizing on the power of an action’s outcomes is merely not enough to classify the act as just or unjust. Rather, by recognizing the importance of an action’s principle, or reason to determine its true moral worth; and therefore neglecting the ethics behind John Stuart Mill. Work…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays