John Lott Summary

Improved Essays
John Lott is a notable gun rights advocate and economist who has worked as a professor in various universities such as the University of Chicago, University of Maryland, and Yale University. Lott has done a significantly high volume of studies concerning gun control, which makes him an authoritative author.
In the third edition of his book, he argues that the issuance of more guns and enforcement of carrying laws will result in the reduction of crime. The latest edition focuses and updates on the crime data collected from Chicago and Washington concerning the impact of gun control policies. Lott concludes that the government should not restrain gun ownership as it will result in the development of responsible citizenship.
The source is credible

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America’s crime rate is at an all time high. Citizens do not feel safe in their own environments. Placing stricter laws on gun control can help reduce these unfortunate circumstances. The federal law does not…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roth concluded that “Several strategies may succeed in reducing gun murders, but rigorous evaluations are needed to ascertain their effectiveness. Among these are reducing firearm lethality (e.g., by banning certain types of ammunition), reducing unauthorized use (e.g., through combination locks on triggers, or sentence enhancements for burglary and fencing violations that involve guns), and educating the public about safe use and storage” (Roth, 2007). He concludes that not gun banning, but reform related to education and pursuing the criminality of illegal arms trade will curb gun violence in the United States. His overall conclusion from his findings is: “Where there is local support, priority should be given to three enforcement objectives: disrupting illegal gun markets; reducing juveniles ' access to guns; and close cooperation between the police and the community to set priorities and enforce laws” (Roth, 2007). Only by working together can the government and its citizens in the U.S. aim to curve violent crime.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Guns, Crime, and Freedom, Wayne LaPierre recounts the genuine story. Up to this point, there has been no single hotspot for Americans - weapon proprietors and the individuals who don't claim guns however are as yet keen on the level headed discussion over firearm control - to locate the accessible realities encompassing the firearm control contention. Guns, Crime, and Freedom has every one of the actualities. It investigates the issues of weapon control, crime, and the Second Amendment, and gives recorded confirmation and informing proclamations regarding the plan of the individuals who need to boycott guns. LaPierre enthusiastically challenges the media and their claim that private weapon possession is the reason for the spiraling crime rate that has made American boulevards and groups perilous.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control has been extremely controversial in society for years. In the essay “Just Take Away Their Guns,” James Q. Wilson argues his view on stricter gun control laws. He writes, “Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” (Wilson, 1994, p.125). He backs up his statement with the statistics that 5/6 of handguns used in crimes are either stolen or purchased privately. With this being said, he displays that increasing legal restraints on purchasing guns will have little to no effect on the use of guns to commit crimes.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research done by John R Lott Jr has shown that gun control laws do not actually prevent crime, and states that allowed concealed carry and exhibited relaxed gun control laws saw drops in crime between the years of 1977 and 1992. This shows that when citizens are allowed to carry concealed guns crime rates become lower. This demonstrates that without gun control laws or bans in place, and with citizens being allowed to carry concealed guns, the rates of violent crimes have shown a decrease. This shows my thesis is correct because it has been proven that citizens who are allowed to carry guns, do in fact use them for self defense and protection, thus scaring off criminals and preventing further crimes from being…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Society has been split into two over whether or not guns should be banned, but there needs to be a solution where both parties can be happy. Anti-gun advocates present reasoning why guns should be banned. McMahan’s main two arguments of why guns should be banned: one, guns in the community creates a more dangerous environment; and two, the police have less of a power to protect citizens when society has guns (Shafer-Landau, The Ethical Life (EL) 390). McMahan explains that communities are not going to be free of crimes with more people carrying around guns, because criminals will be more prepared, efficient, and quicker to grab and shoot their target (Shafer-Landau, EL 392-392). People with guns will be safer than people without guns, because they do not have a gun to protect themselves.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second Amendment Essay

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John R. Lott, Jr., a gun rights activist said, “The problem with such [gun control] laws is that they take away guns from law-abiding citizens while would-be criminals ignore them.” ( Should More Gun Control Be Enacted ). With gun control restrictions in place, the citizens who abide by the law would have their weapons taken away, while the criminals who commit the shootings and murders would ignore them and continue committing felonies. However, in 2014, the city of Chicago had 2,089 victims of shootings and 390 murders, and police recovered 50,000 guns that came from all fifty states between 2001 and March of 2012. ( Should More Gun Control Be Enacted ).…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This deterrent factor has the potential to exponentially increase the rate of gun ownership, resulting in even lower violent crime rates. The benefits to society of increased gun ownership makes the application of constitutional carry, or right-to-carry, legislation a viable tool for reducing the rate of violent crimes by removing dependence on law enforcement to intervene in violent crime…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    And if it does, do laws that put restrictions on the ownership of guns reduce gun-related crimes? These are the questions that many of our representatives in Congress are asking themselves when they go about voting on gun control laws. The debate about gun control versus the right to bear arms is not new and has been here for many years and it still trudges on today. As seen through this paper, gun control is a complicated issue with many different points…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two percent oppose tougher gun control. Throughout the essay the article depicts one sided evidence, this point is clearly portrayed when the author states that, “Moreover the rate of fatal gun accidents has been declining while the level of gun ownership has been rising.” This is inaccurate because these both work hand-in-hand, if the rate of gun ownership is rising the amount of gun accidents will also sky rocket, due to illegal confiscation of these weapons by criminals. The increase of gun ownership does not put a limitation on the malicious acts that criminals commit. Criminals will be criminals despite the circumstance.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns Laws Must Be Changed The debate on new gun legislation at the federal and national levels is roaring topic in today’s American society. On one side of the argument, “gun lovers” constantly make mention of the second amendment and how the law protects the rights of Americans. On the other side of the argument, Americans expecting gun reforms argue new and clearer laws will be preferable for the future of America. Nevertheless, on both sides the truth of the matter is in the statistical evidence of gun violence and gun accessibility.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Control: Unconstitutional or Constructive? In a nation of differing opinions, a few issues stick out. Gun control is one of them, a widely debated subject punctuated by acts of heinous violence. In an attempt to curb this violence, articles such as “Crime, Deterrence, and Right‐to‐Carry Concealed Handguns”, by John Lott, argue that less gun control would lead to less crime.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Thesis: Gun control should not be allowed because, it is proven that it does not work, the framers of the Constitution could not envision a truly free state with gun control in place, and guns are essential to the safety of all citizens. Gun control does not work. In fact, it is quite the opposite, in a 1997 study done by economist John Lott shows that the increase in concealed carry throughout the 1980’s and 1990’s resulted in lower crime rates across the United States. “Therefore, When economist Steven Levitt conducted a study he found that gun control laws played little to no part of the drop in crime.”…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay, “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson a Management and Policy professor at UCLA, argues that legally owned guns are not the problem, in fact the real problem lies with society ignoring the usage of illegal guns. The purpose of this essay is to convey to society that gun crimes can be stopped before a shot is fired, that it does not entitle a huge stack of forms at the local gun store. Wilson effectively argues that legally owned guns are necessary for citizens to protect themselves, reasonable police frisks should be in place to stop illegal gun use before the crime is committed and ultimately guns agitate the situation making crimes worse. The authors credibility and logical appeal are overall effective, in spite of the lack of emotional appeal or connection to the audience. Despite the absence of Pathos, the author conveys an adequate amount of logic, which carries the paper to an effective and persuasive conclusion.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative “You can have all the gun control laws in the country, but if you don’t enforce them, people are gonna find a way to protect themselves. We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons. It’s not the law-abiding citizens, it’s not the person who uses it as a hobby” (Steele). There are around 100,000 victims of gun violence each year (“Brady Campaign...”). Action needs to be taken so Americans don’t feel unprotected going into a public environment.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays