John Locke's State Of Nature

Improved Essays
What is the state of nature?
There are many definitions on what is “state of nature, some encyclopedias consider the state of nature as "uncivilized and uncultured condition", others described it also as a condition before the introduction of the rule of law, and as a state where there are no rights but only freedoms. In such a world where there are no laws, government, and power the people are in a natural condition of humankind. (munro, 2015). In addition, the state of nature is a concept in moral and political philosophy used in religion, social contract theories and international law to denote the hypothetical conditions of what the lives of people might have been like before societies came into existence. This essay will view the points
…show more content…
He believes that people could live in a state of nature, and life would be possible even without the legally established government. The state of nature for him is "pre - political, but not pre - moral". Furthermore, this state of nature for him is a state of complete freedom where all people are equal and only "bond by the law of nature”. Locke’s state of nature is where humans exist without an established government or a social contract. It is a state of anarchy where there is completely no order or rules that guide human behavior. There are no laws to govern us and we are guided by our own instincts on what is right and wrong.
In addition to the above points, Hobbes is the opponent of the state of nature. His opinion is that man could not survive in the state of nature - therefore there is the need of creating a State, by people engaging in social contract and the necessity of people giving up their rights to the Sovereign. On the other hand, Locke is more liberal when talking about the state of nature. For him people can indeed, live in this state in peace with each other. He does not support the State that limits the rights of humans and the absolute power of the Sovereign (as Hobbes

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The thought of an ideal state of nature is to think of life without any government in it. Where there are no Laws or police or a State. Thomas Hobbs, State of Nature (Reagan, 2012). Hobbes fist clam is All humans are by nature equal in the faculties of body and mind (620).…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cyrus The Great Dbq

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Locke played off of Hobbes idea that the sovereign must justify its exercise of power. In contrast however, Locke went much further into identifying human rights. Locke writes that: The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise maker. (Locke 107) Locke believed that in a state of nature all men are inherently equal.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He advocates that the power should be heavily within the people and not only for the government. The absolute ideal goal is to have the government’s role protecting its citizens as he believed in popular sovereignty. In this book, Second Treatise of Government, he states that there are two states: state of war and state of nature. “The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise maker” (§6). State of nature is when every human being have the right to be free and are all equal because each individual were created by God.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theory of the state of nature has been explored by many scholars (John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and John Rawls), which can help us better understand how gender fits into the different concepts of the state of nature. Mankind was brought into this world in a state of nature (pre-social condition) and had to give up liberties for self-preservation under a ruled society for the sole survival of man, or to better themselves. When describing the beginning of civilization, it’s vital to understand the different interpretations of how mankind created social contracts to avoid the state of nature. Two definitions of the state of nature that are important to understand is that of John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s. But more importantly, within the state of nature lies each author’s definition of gender and how it shows the structural similarity and differences between the two.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Each chapter explains a different part of how a government should be formed, where its authority should come from, and when it should be overthrown. Locke begins his work by stating the origins of men in nature, or how mankind existed before entering into civil society. Locke outlines the extent of man’s freedoms in nature; according to Locke man may “dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending upon the will of any other man. [4]” He then explains that man in the state of nature has no right to take his or any other man’s life.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state of nature is a philosophical device used to denote the hypothetical conditions of what the lives of people may have been like prior to societies coming into existence. This foundation of thinking poses many different scenarios and questions about the state of nature. Where some theorists remain optimistic about a state of nature, others argue it would be disastrous and impossible without a government. The way, in which one envisions the society will have drastic consequences for how the state and function is perceived. Two prime examples we can look at today are Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Locke felt that in a state of nature, all men are in perfect freedom and born with a right to liberty and property. This state of perfect freedom is neither good nor bad, however, it is anarchic. Locke believed that people cannot enjoy this state of freedom and that this state of freedom is voluntarily given up in order for people to acquire the advantages of a civilized society. Rousseau’s idea of the state of nature is that all people are free and equal, but primitive and animalistic. In contrast to Locke’s ideas, Rousseau believes that in a state of nature, people do not own property.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Locke’s view the law of nature dictates two things, self-preservation, and preservation of all others as long as those goals don’t conflict. That is the most we can give to government when we create on out of political society. Since that is all the possible power people can give to the government the legislative powers necessarily limited to preserving the political society which set it up. That general limitation breaks down into four specifications which explains why people can’t remain in the state of nature.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The state of nature was lacked a government and each individual retained all of his or her natural rights. People possessed these natural rights (including the right to preserve one’s life, to seize unclaimed treasures, and so forth) because they were given by God to all of his people. However the state of nature is unstable and chaotic. Individuals would be under contrast threat of physical harm. And they would be unable to pursue any goals that required stability and widespread cooperation with other humans.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although both philosophers believe in a State of Nature, they do not necessarily believe in the same concepts within the theory. In Locke’s…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Locke are both social contract theorists who have influenced many citizens of this country. To begin, they both start out talking about human nature. Locke and Hobbes had very different views regarding human nature. Locke claimed human nature as reason and Hobbes claimed it as power and appetite. Locke believes that reason is the primary attribute of human nature.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Because it doesn’t matter how much we complain about poor management of the state’ dealings and/or regulations imposed to us. There are no excuses for resisting power because it is the only thing between us and what we most want to avoid, the State of Nature. John Locke had a different approach as to the kind of place the State of Nature is, and consequently his argument concerning the Social Contract and the relationship between men and authority varies. According to Locke, the State of Nature is the natural condition of mankind.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people specifically philosophers would question, “Why we need a state?” or “What kind of state should we have?” This question opened up all the different views and perspective of the three following philosophers, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. They all have different but also very similar views on the state of nature, social contract, laws. Hobbes definition of state of nature is a state of war. Morality doesn’t exists and everyone lives in constant fear.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays